Big game? Who cares - The NFL, and football in general is worthless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are some valid points hidden in that looney-tune rant,

But people loose all credibility when they say that 'football is dying'

It's not. It's thriving. And post-pandemic, youth football participation is increasing.

the game is changing and its locked in as the nation's top sport

Talk about losing credibility - you claim that youth participation is increasing when it's declining:

https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2023-01-24/youth-football-participation-declining-amid-safety-concerns

And it will continue to do so - the talent pipeline is drying up as informed parents who understand the real risks to long term brain health opt for more sensible options for sport.

They(NFL) are making a hard pitch for flag football, which I'm sure is increasing, and they are pitching this to woman, which by any measure is welcomed but at the same time only shows how desperate they are.


They game will still need to substantially and fundamentally change more if it is to remain viable in the long term.

The NFL is making a hard pitch at flag football? What in the eff are you talking about? You know nothing about the game, what draws people to it or what the future holds for it. You’re a nut who wants ro regulate fun out of life. Piss off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are some valid points hidden in that looney-tune rant,

But people loose all credibility when they say that 'football is dying'

It's not. It's thriving. And post-pandemic, youth football participation is increasing.

the game is changing and its locked in as the nation's top sport

Talk about losing credibility - you claim that youth participation is increasing when it's declining:

https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2023-01-24/youth-football-participation-declining-amid-safety-concerns

And it will continue to do so - the talent pipeline is drying up as informed parents who understand the real risks to long term brain health opt for more sensible options for sport.

They(NFL) are making a hard pitch for flag football, which I'm sure is increasing, and they are pitching this to woman, which by any measure is welcomed but at the same time only shows how desperate they are.


They game will still need to substantially and fundamentally change more if it is to remain viable in the long term.

The NFL is making a hard pitch at flag football? What in the eff are you talking about? You know nothing about the game, what draws people to it or what the future holds for it. You’re a nut who wants ro regulate fun out of life. Piss off.

And why would the NFL pitch anything to “woman” (sic)? Who gives a flying f$ck what women think about a game that does not involve them beyond the token annoying female sideline reporters we all hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are some valid points hidden in that looney-tune rant,

But people loose all credibility when they say that 'football is dying'

It's not. It's thriving. And post-pandemic, youth football participation is increasing.

the game is changing and its locked in as the nation's top sport

Talk about losing credibility - you claim that youth participation is increasing when it's declining:

https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2023-01-24/youth-football-participation-declining-amid-safety-concerns

And it will continue to do so - the talent pipeline is drying up as informed parents who understand the real risks to long term brain health opt for more sensible options for sport.

They(NFL) are making a hard pitch for flag football, which I'm sure is increasing, and they are pitching this to woman, which by any measure is welcomed but at the same time only shows how desperate they are.


They game will still need to substantially and fundamentally change more if it is to remain viable in the long term.

The NFL is making a hard pitch at flag football? What in the eff are you talking about? You know nothing about the game, what draws people to it or what the future holds for it. You’re a nut who wants ro regulate fun out of life. Piss off.

lol, you don't seem particularly bright nor are you following along closely. Maybe stick to commenting on things you actually know something about:


https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-makes-strong-push-for-flag-football-with-eye-on-olympics

Note, the link above is nfl.com, ie direct from the "horses mouth".

So, who is it now that knows "nothing about the game", lol?

[Anonymous]

enjoy the bookstore on Sunday and I hope they don't mess up your tea order.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:enjoy the bookstore on Sunday and I hope they don't mess up your tea order.

So you have nothing - I acknowledge your surrender and you are dismissed.

[Anonymous]

Haven't cared in years. Superbowl weekend is a great time to do other things while everyone else mindlessly watches the game, so it's win win for me.

[Anonymous]

I love football and am enthusiastic about this super bowl which I think has an above average potential to be a good game.

It's a really exciting game to watch. And I'm not alone. Football is enormously popular.

There are really important points to be raised about racism in the sport and yes, as a viewer, there are times when I really question the dynamic of these white owners and the way they treat the mostly play players.

HOWEVER.

Those players are unionized and many of them have a kind of leverage that most workforces will never have (fame, fandom, and money). Does that mean they are more powerful than the owners? No. Certainly not on an individual basis. But collectively, they do have power and they do sometimes leverage it for their collective good. I think the union could do more and also thing the league needs to be more closely regulated. However, the best thing we could do to level those power dynamics more fairly tax the ultra-wealthy families that own the teams.

If you don't like the power dynamics of rich white people employing less rich black people in a sport with a lot of contact, I wonder how you feel about, say, the meat packing and canning industries. Similar dynamics but no union, the workforce is often largely immigrant and uneducated, exploitation is common. Do you boycott all the food that comes out of those industries? They are in my opinion far worse than football in terms of the sort of "plantation" dynamics you are talking about. And no one ever got rich working on a meat packing plant floor. At least in the NFL, we get to see black stars who earn good money excel in their chosen line of work.

The league needs to do more to protect the players, the media and governing bodies need to do more to hold the league to account, and we as a society need to stop just giving these owners whatever they want (there should be no such thing as a publicly funded professional sports stadium, please).

But the idea that football is inherently bad whereas every other part of our economy is filled with the same dynamics and and even less empowered workforce? Whatever, you just don't like football. Which is fine, don't like it. No one is making you watch it. But a lot of us like it.

[Anonymous]

The NFL is fixed, rigged, fake.
The players are hybrid humans.
The game of the week was decided long before any player walked onto the field.
Skin color has NOTHING to do with football. ZERO. Never has never will.

It will go away when the truth comes out.

[Anonymous]

You ask who cares? Well 208 million people watched the last Super Bowl, so I guess some people care. Probably the most watched sporting event other than the World Cup

[Anonymous]

I’m just here waiting for fastpitch season to begin.

[Anonymous]

This dumb question is nothing less than an attack on American culture. And I've seen a lot of that here on DCUM lately.
Next OP is gonna attack mom and apple pie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have you ever listened to the players? Many dgaf even with the brain injury risk.

You feel better now? Even a game like soccer has a lot of cte. Try telling the world that soccer is a plantation system. You’ll be laughed out of the room by many diverse nations.

That's ironic that you'd reference Soccer since they too have a similar issues at the top levels - plenty of top-notch black talent from Africa but very few managers(coaches) and no meaningful representation in management/ownership either:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-arent-there-more-black-managers-in-english-soccer/

[Anonymous]

Playing football is voluntary. I’d love to see some non-white old men owners.

[Anonymous]

Fly Eagles Fly!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are some valid points hidden in that looney-tune rant,

But people loose all credibility when they say that 'football is dying'

It's not. It's thriving. And post-pandemic, youth football participation is increasing.

the game is changing and its locked in as the nation's top sport

Talk about losing credibility - you claim that youth participation is increasing when it's declining:

https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2023-01-24/youth-football-participation-declining-amid-safety-concerns

And it will continue to do so - the talent pipeline is drying up as informed parents who understand the real risks to long term brain health opt for more sensible options for sport.

They(NFL) are making a hard pitch for flag football, which I'm sure is increasing, and they are pitching this to woman, which by any measure is welcomed but at the same time only shows how desperate they are.


They game will still need to substantially and fundamentally change more if it is to remain viable in the long term.

Gee, I wonder what was happening in the 21-22 school year that may have caused football participation to plummet.

Locally, football is increasing: fredericknewspost.com/sports/level/high_school/numbers-are-up-in-football-programs-across-the-county/article_aab5a040-a674-5b6a-af8b-a1ce3c4d4d78.html

For the first time in years, schools are actuallying having to cut players.