Agree and these lazy parents are so toxic! |
Once again for the folks in the back of the room… Education requires schools, community culture prioritizing education and parents working together. While it’s a nice thought to imagine schools can make up for the lack of the other two, it’s not possible. Across the board equal outcomes will never be a thing. We can’t hold back the kids who want to learn in favor of the ones who don’t. Is it sad? Yes, terribly. Should we do a great deal to support kids who don’t have the same advantages, of course! Does a gap mean the school should be sued? No, that’s ridiculous. |
Skeletons? Every school system has problems with the achievement gap between "special" populations. You make it sound like this is some hidden deep dark secret when the data is out there for everyone to see. The issue is the only people who care about that are parents of the "special" population. This isn't something MCPS is doing intentionally. No one knows what to do to fix this. If the special ed population is who you are referring to, none of the school systems does a very good job and most try to pretend like the kids don't exist. It's going to get worse because of teacher shortages which mean not only fewer teachers but out of desperation they hire people they never should hire. If it's minority students you're referring to, programs have been tried and numerous studies have been done. I know good educators who are so frustrated by this themselves not knowing what to do to remedy this. |
I often think of the saying you can lead a horse to water. Education is about providing opportunities. The demographics of the county have changed radically over the past few decades. This impacts test score averages. It doesn't mean that there is less opportunity to obtain a first-rate education; however, many students just aren't interested. I don't have the answers but I often wonder if maybe we should meet kids where they are instead of insisting that everyone go to college or take advanced math. |
| I agree. Stop pushing college on everyone. Unless it becomes free, only the top students from low income families are going to go and complete a 4 year degree. |
We don't insist that everyone go to college or take advanced math. MCPS has been increasing the number of programs for career preparation in high school, and there are lots of interesting options. Kids should be encouraged to explore these and not feel stigmatized about them. |
So much of HS seems geared toward this though and we even rank HS based on college readiness. This seems kind of silly in low-income areas where there is lower college participation. Now don't get me wrong I feel we should help everyone pursue that if that's their goal. I just don't think we should make it the default. |
If this will result in quality education for students, I think its worth ever penny |
+1. We need to accept that equal outcomes are not possible or practical. And striving for them does not lead to better overall outcomes. We need a return to sanity. We need to lift up those who want to be lifted at all levels. |
Agree. Incumbent board members should be voted out in upcoming election. Bringing in fresh ideas and minds will result in better education and bright future for all students. Aren't you tired of theatrics at board meetings? |
It sounds like you would deny a child a magnet seat because of their skin color versus their qualifications? Asians are more of a minority in Montgomery County and Maryland than Whites, Blacks, or Latino / Hispanics. Ever think that asians work hard to get into these programs because they know this? They're outnumbered in the workforce and won't get the job based on 'who you know' but only on sheer over-qualification? And you would deny a child that opportunity to learn? Racist b. If you work for MCPS, you need to be gone. |
| ^^ fired. (I don't want to get banned from the server because of a typo..) |
Completely agree and the sooner we come to grips with this reality the better we can help everyone. |
I don't think that's what the poster was saying. it's a matter of how qualifications are determined. For example using local norms is considered a best practice in gifted and talented circles. It also provides a fair means to rank ability across schools with different levels of affluence since use of outside enrichment varies. This is a point of contention but it's reasonable to believe that these programs should serve all students not just those able to afford outside classes. |
But I think it's changing, in a positive direction. "College and career readiness" is the phrase being used in high schools all the time these days. |