Distressed dad says 'never did I think I would have a problem finding food for my baby in America'

[Anonymous]

The specialty formulas for people (not just infants BTW) with rare health conditions have been the most affected, but regular powdered formula is getting hard to find too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The Biden Administration needs to do something quickly. This is very important.

So there are times when we need a strong federal government. 👍

Absolutely. And anyone who is pro life had better support this, regardless of how they feel about Democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The Biden Administration needs to do something quickly. This is very important.

So there are times when we need a strong federal government. 👍

+1
Turns out we actually need a strong federal government and, gee whodathunkit, regulations.

I do hope this problem is resolved quickly. Unlike forced birthers, I actually care about existing people and don’t want them to suffer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Capitalism says it’s your problem if you can’t find life-saving formula for your child or sick adult.

In a way that very true. Capitalism is silent on a lot of things. It doesn't provide a framework for family relationships, for example, or suicide prevention. Note that socialism also doesn't provide a solution for this. There is nothing in socialism that says the collective has to exhaust every bit of resource to fulfill every last need by an individual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Capitalism says it’s your problem if you can’t find life-saving formula for your child or sick adult.

In a way that very true. Capitalism is silent on a lot of things. It doesn't provide a framework for family relationships, for example, or suicide prevention. Note that socialism also doesn't provide a solution for this. There is nothing in socialism that says the collective has to exhaust every bit of resource to fulfill every last need by an individual.

NP. I missed the part where anyone here was advocating for every last need by an individual, as opposed to just one need.

Could you point it out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like acid reflux or super rare? Certainly tough to live or raise a child with a rare medical condition.

Super rare.

It’s been a big issue discussed in parenting groups.

I hope the FDA/Biden can step in. But I like a strong gov’t and all of that.

Its really not as rare as you think. Not in cumulative. If you take all the "rare" kids who need special formula and put them together then it isnt a small number of kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Capitalism says it’s your problem if you can’t find life-saving formula for your child or sick adult.

In a way that very true. Capitalism is silent on a lot of things. It doesn't provide a framework for family relationships, for example, or suicide prevention. Note that socialism also doesn't provide a solution for this. There is nothing in socialism that says the collective has to exhaust every bit of resource to fulfill every last need by an individual.

I'm the PP. I think you can have a healthy capitalist economy with some safeguards built in to protect people--without being a "socialist" country. For example, most governments in advanced societies negotiate with drug manufacturers on drug prices to ensure that their citizens can afford medication. Take insulin as an example. We pay more--WAY more--than any other people in the world for insulin. Other countries with a capitalist economy pay far less. Why can't we have both--capitalism and a government that ensures we have access to affordable medication, especially for common chronic diseases like diabetes?

https://pharmanewsintel.com/news/insulin-prices-8x-higher-in-the-us-compared-to-similar-nations
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/cost-of-insulin-by-country

[Anonymous]

I would strongly support the government making or ensuring a steady supply of any lifesaving formula or drug for which a market failure can mean death to thousands. But most people would call that “socialist” so we can’t do that. “Pro life” and “saving babies” only has meaning when someone gets to profit from it, apparently.

[Anonymous]

I don't remember reading anywhere where supplies a formula were deeply rooted in our nation's history

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Better start driving across state lines. I heard a lot of things are a problem to find these days...

That’s really awful to say. Not helping at all. This doesn’t concern you? It does me! I don’t like that people and babies with serious health problems have to try to find food! Such a situation should not exist in America. Geez.

Nope. It doesn't bother me. Like lack of abortion access to half of the population doesn't bother you. Get in a car and drive.

So much for the democrat party caring about people. You are not a nice person and the most vulnerable are struggling while you snark uncaringly.

Nicer than any Republican POS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would strongly support the government making or ensuring a steady supply of any lifesaving formula or drug for which a market failure can mean death to thousands. But most people would call that “socialist” so we can’t do that. “Pro life” and “saving babies” only has meaning when someone gets to profit from it, apparently.

Kids with rare diseases wont make a good servant class so no, it isnt a priority. Need to keep goods and services cheap.

[Anonymous]

These factories were shut down by the government that was regulating them, so it's not capitalism. Capitalism would be you need to figure out on your own at this formula is safe or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would strongly support the government making or ensuring a steady supply of any lifesaving formula or drug for which a market failure can mean death to thousands. But most people would call that “socialist” so we can’t do that. “Pro life” and “saving babies” only has meaning when someone gets to profit from it, apparently.

Exactly

[Anonymous]

If you can't find waiters or truck drivers, you're not going to find baby formula makers to work in the factory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would strongly support the government making or ensuring a steady supply of any lifesaving formula or drug for which a market failure can mean death to thousands. But most people would call that “socialist” so we can’t do that. “Pro life” and “saving babies” only has meaning when someone gets to profit from it, apparently.

When has this been proposed, who called it socialist and said it couldn't happen? Or are you just throwing your own imaginary nonsense out there? Are you actually doing something about this? Or do you prefer cowering in your made-up world of fear?