DP here. Think how much better your child could have done without all the screentime. |
Yeah, you’re not going to convince me with your fearmongering. But enjoy feeling superior for no good reason! |
Better than getting in everywhere and testing 99th percentile? |
|
All depends on the age of your child.
|
Sure, perhaps a gifted school or testing off the charts. But I also meant better physically, socially, behaviorally, etc. You can’t prove a negative so you have no idea where she might be had she not had excess screen use. |
Exactly. And moreover, you don’t know my kid at all, so your assertion is really pretty nervy of you. |
+1. |
|
Hmm … let’s see.
I watched a ton of TV. So did DH. We have 3 MA’s between us. We make a combined $450K. We both graduated with honors from top 20 research universities. Oh, and my sister is a professor at an R1 research university, despite also watching a ton of TV. Are you people really trying to argue that if we had watched less TV, we would be more successful? |
No, she’s right actually. You’re justifying x by a favorable but not outstanding outcome. And further, you’re asserting that all kids should have excessive screen time like your daughter even though you don’t know their kids at all. |
Did I ever say they should have excess screen time? No. I said I don’t think it’s damaging my kid at all. |
|
Only on DCUM would testing at the 99th percentile be considered “favorable but not outstanding.”
You people are disturbed. |
Yes. Are you physically as healthy and coordinated as you could be? Are you as satisfied and emotionally happy and connected as you can be? Do you love books and discussing ideas as much as you could? This justification of watching TV based on one criteria is ridiculous. |
Yes to all of that. I feel 100% fulfilled in my life. |
You aren’t comprehending what the two PPs have written. Too much TV as a child? |
|