Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?

[Anonymous]

1 year probation -- first time OUI. Done. We're done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wasn’t the house ever part of the investigation????? If someone was found dead on my front yard, I assume the police would like to rule out that it happened in my house.

Actually, no. If there is not probable cause there will not be a warrant issued to search your house. Especially in this case as JOK was found in the snow with taillights around him and one of the women claiming she hit him.

You keep repeating this nonsense. Did anyone actually TRY to get a warrant??

Please speak to any attorney that is willing to discuss this with you. Or better yet reread the constitution and reflect on our basic rights to not be subject to government searches without probable cause. There was zero basis to get a warrant to search the house.

I’m an attorney. You’re clearly a POS who doesn’t care about people’s rights. You’re a thug

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wasn’t the house ever part of the investigation????? If someone was found dead on my front yard, I assume the police would like to rule out that it happened in my house.

Actually, no. If there is not probable cause there will not be a warrant issued to search your house. Especially in this case as JOK was found in the snow with taillights around him and one of the women claiming she hit him.

You keep repeating this nonsense. Did anyone actually TRY to get a warrant??

Please speak to any attorney that is willing to discuss this with you. Or better yet reread the constitution and reflect on our basic rights to not be subject to government searches without probable cause. There was zero basis to get a warrant to search the house.

I’m an attorney. You’re clearly a POS who doesn’t care about people’s rights. You’re a thug

???? Isn’t caring about rights being scrupulous about not overreaching with warrants??Caselaw to support a warrant in this situation???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wasn’t the house ever part of the investigation????? If someone was found dead on my front yard, I assume the police would like to rule out that it happened in my house.

Actually, no. If there is not probable cause there will not be a warrant issued to search your house. Especially in this case as JOK was found in the snow with taillights around him and one of the women claiming she hit him.

You keep repeating this nonsense. Did anyone actually TRY to get a warrant??

Please speak to any attorney that is willing to discuss this with you. Or better yet reread the constitution and reflect on our basic rights to not be subject to government searches without probable cause. There was zero basis to get a warrant to search the house.

I’m an attorney. You’re clearly a POS who doesn’t care about people’s rights. You’re a thug

???? Isn’t caring about rights being scrupulous about not overreaching with warrants??Caselaw to support a warrant in this situation???

The so-called attorney who just called you a thug needs to read Sam Dash's excellent book on the 4th Amendment, The Intruders: Unreasonable Searches and Seizures from King John to John Ashcroft

And then be ashamed of having so little respect for the bill of rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1 year probation -- first time OUI. Done. We're done.

This was the right decision. Maybe the cops will learn they have to behave like professionals

[Anonymous]

And the verdict in CW v Read is shameful - I despair for the future of our justice system if crowdsourced innocence fraud campaigns are going to rule the day.

Ah well, I guess it will only be the wealthy whites who get a pass on killing cops and other people, no worries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And the verdict in CW v Read is shameful - I despair for the future of our justice system if crowdsourced innocence fraud campaigns are going to rule the day.

Ah well, I guess it will only be the wealthy whites who get a pass on killing cops and other people, no worries.

I knew nothing about this case until this year. The CW did not prove their case, period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This goes to show everyone that with money you can accomplish anything. Their online campaign worked, their bots, their fake news all of it worked. It's sick.

You're going to see the same with P diddy watch.

Good news for Luigi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wasn’t the house ever part of the investigation????? If someone was found dead on my front yard, I assume the police would like to rule out that it happened in my house.

Actually, no. If there is not probable cause there will not be a warrant issued to search your house. Especially in this case as JOK was found in the snow with taillights around him and one of the women claiming she hit him.

You keep repeating this nonsense. Did anyone actually TRY to get a warrant??

Please speak to any attorney that is willing to discuss this with you. Or better yet reread the constitution and reflect on our basic rights to not be subject to government searches without probable cause. There was zero basis to get a warrant to search the house.

I’m an attorney. You’re clearly a POS who doesn’t care about people’s rights. You’re a thug

???? Isn’t caring about rights being scrupulous about not overreaching with warrants??Caselaw to support a warrant in this situation???

The so-called attorney who just called you a thug needs to read Sam Dash's excellent book on the 4th Amendment, The Intruders: Unreasonable Searches and Seizures from King John to John Ashcroft

And then be ashamed of having so little respect for the bill of rights.

You are totally pathetic. I know all about rights having gone to law school, thanks.

People have rights, of course, but it’s not just limited to cops, as much as you want to pretend they’re better than everyone else (and Karen is just a ‘c^nt’, right??). Defendants have rights too and the commonwealth had an obligation to investigate this case. A cop was dead on the front lawn of a house he had allegedly gone to for a party. She was being charged with murder. It wasn’t clear how he died. = warrant.

I also find it very rich that you’re running to complain about unreasonable searches when every cop from the beginning of the history of time has tried to convince people to agree to searches voluntarily.

What, these cops couldn’t gave voluntarily allowed a search of their house?? Why not??

You are shameless and dumb in your hypocrisy. Grow the F up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And the verdict in CW v Read is shameful - I despair for the future of our justice system if crowdsourced innocence fraud campaigns are going to rule the day.

Ah well, I guess it will only be the wealthy whites who get a pass on killing cops and other people, no worries.

She wasn’t wealthy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And the verdict in CW v Read is shameful - I despair for the future of our justice system if crowdsourced innocence fraud campaigns are going to rule the day.

Ah well, I guess it will only be the wealthy whites who get a pass on killing cops and other people, no worries.

Garbage in, garbage out. Run a shoddy investigation that includes a cop in possession of a suspect’s cell phone telling his buddies about the contents of said piece of evidence, and you get what you get. Knowingly reverse the sally port footage and try to pass that off as evidence until the defense points out your deception to the jury, you get what you get. Maybe next time, think twice before collecting evidence in a freaking Solo cup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Discusting makes you think you can commit just about any crime these days and get away with it.

Like Donald Trump, eh?

Also, it’s “disgusting.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wasn’t the house ever part of the investigation????? If someone was found dead on my front yard, I assume the police would like to rule out that it happened in my house.

Actually, no. If there is not probable cause there will not be a warrant issued to search your house. Especially in this case as JOK was found in the snow with taillights around him and one of the women claiming she hit him.

You keep repeating this nonsense. Did anyone actually TRY to get a warrant??

Please speak to any attorney that is willing to discuss this with you. Or better yet reread the constitution and reflect on our basic rights to not be subject to government searches without probable cause. There was zero basis to get a warrant to search the house.

I’m an attorney. You’re clearly a POS who doesn’t care about people’s rights. You’re a thug

???? Isn’t caring about rights being scrupulous about not overreaching with warrants??Caselaw to support a warrant in this situation???

News flash. They could have gotten a warrant. There was cause.

News flash. Defendants have rights too. Not just cops.

Stop cosplaying someone who knows or cares about rights. You just wanted to see her burn because you think cops should be entitled to do whatever they want.

Like drunk driving around and acting like morons and thugs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wasn’t the house ever part of the investigation????? If someone was found dead on my front yard, I assume the police would like to rule out that it happened in my house.

Actually, no. If there is not probable cause there will not be a warrant issued to search your house. Especially in this case as JOK was found in the snow with taillights around him and one of the women claiming she hit him.

You keep repeating this nonsense. Did anyone actually TRY to get a warrant??

Please speak to any attorney that is willing to discuss this with you. Or better yet reread the constitution and reflect on our basic rights to not be subject to government searches without probable cause. There was zero basis to get a warrant to search the house.

I’m an attorney. You’re clearly a POS who doesn’t care about people’s rights. You’re a thug

???? Isn’t caring about rights being scrupulous about not overreaching with warrants??Caselaw to support a warrant in this situation???

The so-called attorney who just called you a thug needs to read Sam Dash's excellent book on the 4th Amendment, The Intruders: Unreasonable Searches and Seizures from King John to John Ashcroft

And then be ashamed of having so little respect for the bill of rights.

You are totally pathetic. I know all about rights having gone to law school, thanks.

People have rights, of course, but it’s not just limited to cops, as much as you want to pretend they’re better than everyone else (and Karen is just a ‘c^nt’, right??). Defendants have rights too and the commonwealth had an obligation to investigate this case. A cop was dead on the front lawn of a house he had allegedly gone to for a party. She was being charged with murder. It wasn’t clear how he died. = warrant.

I also find it very rich that you’re running to complain about unreasonable searches when every cop from the beginning of the history of time has tried to convince people to agree to searches voluntarily.

What, these cops couldn’t gave voluntarily allowed a search of their house?? Why not??

You are shameless and dumb in your hypocrisy. Grow the F up.

That is a LOT of rudeness and ad hominem…. How about instead you provide just one example of a case or guideline on the basis of which a judge could approve a warrant in this situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wasn’t the house ever part of the investigation????? If someone was found dead on my front yard, I assume the police would like to rule out that it happened in my house.

Actually, no. If there is not probable cause there will not be a warrant issued to search your house. Especially in this case as JOK was found in the snow with taillights around him and one of the women claiming she hit him.

You keep repeating this nonsense. Did anyone actually TRY to get a warrant??

Please speak to any attorney that is willing to discuss this with you. Or better yet reread the constitution and reflect on our basic rights to not be subject to government searches without probable cause. There was zero basis to get a warrant to search the house.

I’m an attorney. You’re clearly a POS who doesn’t care about people’s rights. You’re a thug

???? Isn’t caring about rights being scrupulous about not overreaching with warrants??Caselaw to support a warrant in this situation???

News flash. They could have gotten a warrant. There was cause.

News flash. Defendants have rights too. Not just cops.

Stop cosplaying someone who knows or cares about rights. You just wanted to see her burn because you think cops should be entitled to do whatever they want.

Like drunk driving around and acting like morons and thugs

You must be a terrible attorney if you think there was probable cause to seek a warrant for that house - there most definitely absolutely WAS NOT, and that is a fact pretty much universally acknowledged by every Commonwealth attorney who has commented on the case.

That said, law enforcement was welcomed into the home by the homeowners minutes after John's body was 'found' (Karen knew exactly where he was, because she hit him and left him there) and LEOs were in the house repeatedly that day. There was zero evidence that anything untoward happened in that house, this is just another red herring of the innocence fraud campaign.

Again, you're a terrible lawyer. I sincerely hope you are not practicing criminal law.