Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why wasn’t the house ever part of the investigation????? If someone was found dead on my front yard, I assume the police would like to rule out that it happened in my house. [/quote] Actually, no. If there is not probable cause there will not be a warrant issued to search your house. Especially in this case as JOK was found in the snow with taillights around him and one of the women claiming she hit him. [/quote] You keep repeating this nonsense. Did anyone actually TRY to get a warrant?? [/quote] Please speak to any attorney that is willing to discuss this with you. Or better yet reread the constitution and reflect on our basic rights to not be subject to government searches without probable cause. There was zero basis to get a warrant to search the house. [/quote] I’m an attorney. You’re clearly a POS who doesn’t care about people’s rights. You’re a thug [/quote] ???? Isn’t caring about rights being scrupulous about not overreaching with warrants??Caselaw to support a warrant in this situation???[/quote] The so-called attorney who just called you a thug needs to read Sam Dash's excellent book on the 4th Amendment, [i]The Intruders: Unreasonable Searches and Seizures from King John to John Ashcroft[/i] And then be ashamed of having so little respect for the bill of rights.[/quote] You are totally pathetic. I know all about rights having gone to law school, thanks. People have rights, of course, but it’s not just limited to cops, as much as you want to pretend they’re better than everyone else (and Karen is just a ‘c^nt’, right??). Defendants have rights too and the commonwealth had an obligation to investigate this case. A cop was dead on the front lawn of a house he had allegedly gone to for a party. She was being charged with murder. It wasn’t clear how he died. = warrant. I also find it very rich that you’re running to complain about unreasonable searches when every cop from the beginning of the history of time has tried to convince people to agree to searches voluntarily. What, these cops couldn’t gave voluntarily allowed a search of their house?? Why not?? You are shameless and dumb in your hypocrisy. Grow the F up. [/quote] That is a LOT of rudeness and ad hominem…. How about instead you provide just one example of a case or guideline on the basis of which a judge could approve a warrant in this situation. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics