VHSL Girls Lacrosse 2025

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Battlefield's strength of schedule was surely helped by that 14-9 loss to YT.


And by beating up on the Sister-of-the-Poor 5A JV squads. They beat a Lightridge team who’s best commit is going to Radford, the same Radford team ranked 128th out of 131 teams. If you’ve ever seen teams play at this level in D1 you know how painful those games are to watch. Lightridge may be tops in 5A but that’s not saying a lot.


I’d like to better understand what teams are considered on top and who should be on everyone’s schedule? Looking at prior comments, some contradictions on who has a tough schedule and who doesn’t.


This year it’s really YT and everyone else. There are not as many elite teams as there have been in past years like YT, Woodson, Madison, Oakton, Riverside, Dominion, etc. With the drop off in numbers playing and talent level there seems to be more parity among average teams.


Can you provide a link to the data that shows a drop off in numbers playing? There is no way to compare talent level across tens of teams over time so I won't even ask for support on that point.


Having had several daughters play over a span of years, I have to agree the numbers are down. You don’t have to look any further than rec lacrosse to understand it’s not the same.

When my first daughter played there were 3-5 teams in each age group. And making the A team was a big deal. You really had to be a strong player to make this team. Now, our rec program is lucky to field 1 team in each age bracket. None in the A division. Everyone makes the team, which hurts the players mixing such wide skill sets. From our experience, the numbers and talent have fallen way off. It’s sad to see at the youth level because this feeds future high school and college programs.

This is impacting high school teams and games. My first who played had players cut from JV. It was hard to make varsity. There were 4 teams in her district that could compete on any given night and win. Today, districts have 1, maybe two teams, that are competitive with one another. Go to many games and players on the field struggle with the basics of passing and catching. Teams now can barely fill a varsity roster, often filling them with athletes who have not played the sport. There are fewer JV teams and some JV games are 7v7.

I wish I could say club has filled the void, but the reality is local high school club teams are not competing at the same level as in the past. The high water mark for local high school club teams may have been the 2023 class when both Capital Blue and Pride Black were ranked in the top 10 at one point. Those two teams alone probably sent 30+ players to D1 programs from that class.

US Lacrosse may have stats on the games growth, but locally in Northern VA the numbers have been down from our personal experience. And with it the talent as well.


Is your experience based on the Concorde division (Vienna rec)? Where my daughter is at, it’s the opposite scenario. The rec program could barely field a competitive A team many years ago and now they have multiple teams at the higher levels. These things tend to go in cycles.
Anonymous
Survey... hope for (a), but likely (b).
Anonymous
Nothing indicates anything other than B.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow, someone has way too much time in their hands to be analyzing girls HS lax.
Get a life old man


Says someone who probably took the time to read it...

Rather see this than another post about Battlefield freshmen or their ASU commit...



It wasn’t even brought up, but since you did. She’s good. Would BF be the same team without her? How much of the weight does she carry? I say she carries a lot. Not a lot of the other girls score from bf


ASU lost to Marquette


what relevance does that have here?


ASU barely beat Cincinnati


Stats and facts ASU commit

Battlefield has played toughest schedule so far rating wise. YT is 76.77 after adding Woodson win.

Through 6 games
Goals 28 on 34 shots
Assist 10
DC 30
CT. 14
GB. 12

She’s in mix for POY case closed


If she’s that good why would she commit to ASU? You would think she would use that lax talent to get into a much better school.


Please do keep us posted on where your subpar, less than athletic, entitled daughter ends up going, and how many years she rides the bench before she quits.


Actually riding the bench is a common scenario for star recruits their first year or two at the high end of the D1 scale.
first year or four…
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Battlefield's strength of schedule was surely helped by that 14-9 loss to YT.


And by beating up on the Sister-of-the-Poor 5A JV squads. They beat a Lightridge team who’s best commit is going to Radford, the same Radford team ranked 128th out of 131 teams. If you’ve ever seen teams play at this level in D1 you know how painful those games are to watch. Lightridge may be tops in 5A but that’s not saying a lot.


I’d like to better understand what teams are considered on top and who should be on everyone’s schedule? Looking at prior comments, some contradictions on who has a tough schedule and who doesn’t.


This year it’s really YT and everyone else. There are not as many elite teams as there have been in past years like YT, Woodson, Madison, Oakton, Riverside, Dominion, etc. With the drop off in numbers playing and talent level there seems to be more parity among average teams.


Can you provide a link to the data that shows a drop off in numbers playing? There is no way to compare talent level across tens of teams over time so I won't even ask for support on that point.


Having had several daughters play over a span of years, I have to agree the numbers are down. You don’t have to look any further than rec lacrosse to understand it’s not the same.

When my first daughter played there were 3-5 teams in each age group. And making the A team was a big deal. You really had to be a strong player to make this team. Now, our rec program is lucky to field 1 team in each age bracket. None in the A division. Everyone makes the team, which hurts the players mixing such wide skill sets. From our experience, the numbers and talent have fallen way off. It’s sad to see at the youth level because this feeds future high school and college programs.

This is impacting high school teams and games. My first who played had players cut from JV. It was hard to make varsity. There were 4 teams in her district that could compete on any given night and win. Today, districts have 1, maybe two teams, that are competitive with one another. Go to many games and players on the field struggle with the basics of passing and catching. Teams now can barely fill a varsity roster, often filling them with athletes who have not played the sport. There are fewer JV teams and some JV games are 7v7.

I wish I could say club has filled the void, but the reality is local high school club teams are not competing at the same level as in the past. The high water mark for local high school club teams may have been the 2023 class when both Capital Blue and Pride Black were ranked in the top 10 at one point. Those two teams alone probably sent 30+ players to D1 programs from that class.

US Lacrosse may have stats on the games growth, but locally in Northern VA the numbers have been down from our personal experience. And with it the talent as well.


Is your experience based on the Concorde division (Vienna rec)? Where my daughter is at, it’s the opposite scenario. The rec program could barely field a competitive A team many years ago and now they have multiple teams at the higher levels. These things tend to go in cycles.


NVYLL doesn’t even have a 7/8A division any more and 5/6A only has 4 teams. That pretty much sums up the number and talent issue. It’s what it uses to be, as they say.
Anonymous
How long will the BI transfer dads keep trolling BF. I get it your 3-6 not much to write about in the Private school forum.
Anonymous
The real question is why is do people troll the BF posters and not the other schools?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow, someone has way too much time in their hands to be analyzing girls HS lax.
Get a life old man


Says someone who probably took the time to read it...

Rather see this than another post about Battlefield freshmen or their ASU commit...



It wasn’t even brought up, but since you did. She’s good. Would BF be the same team without her? How much of the weight does she carry? I say she carries a lot. Not a lot of the other girls score from bf


ASU lost to Marquette


what relevance does that have here?


ASU barely beat Cincinnati


Stats and facts ASU commit

Battlefield has played toughest schedule so far rating wise. YT is 76.77 after adding Woodson win.

Through 6 games
Goals 28 on 34 shots
Assist 10
DC 30
CT. 14
GB. 12

She’s in mix for POY case closed


If she’s that good why would she commit to ASU? You would think she would use that lax talent to get into a much better school.


Maybe she can help ASU beat Marquette next year.
Anonymous
NVYLL has fallen apart on the A level because of their refusal to work with travel and NGLL. Teams have to forfeit games all the time. Parents and players are over it. 1/3 of the travel kids are still playing NVYLL. They just play NGLL. I have coached on the A level for the last 5 years in 3/4, 5/6 and 7/8. It's incredibly frustrating and NVYLL leadership doesn't seem to care. Now their league has fallen apart. I agree that our program used to have 3 or 4 teams on each level. Now we have 1 7/8 team and 2 5/6 teams. That NVYLL has no 7/8 A league and just 4 teams in the 5/6 A league is crazy.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Survey: If BF actually ever wins a state title (I know it’s a big IF but one can dream) do you think their parents who post here will:

(a) Show some humility and stop their incessant posting about how great they think their team is because results speak for themselves.
(b) increase the frequency of their posting (if that’s even possible) and gloat for a year bringing their obnoxious posting to an entirely new level
(c) post about the same as before
(d) other - state what you think will happen



(e) VHSL is so watered down now their title would have an asterisk as they won it against a historically weak field and lack of overall talent.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:NVYLL has fallen apart on the A level because of their refusal to work with travel and NGLL. Teams have to forfeit games all the time. Parents and players are over it. 1/3 of the travel kids are still playing NVYLL. They just play NGLL. I have coached on the A level for the last 5 years in 3/4, 5/6 and 7/8. It's incredibly frustrating and NVYLL leadership doesn't seem to care. Now their league has fallen apart. I agree that our program used to have 3 or 4 teams on each level. Now we have 1 7/8 team and 2 5/6 teams. That NVYLL has no 7/8 A league and just 4 teams in the 5/6 A league is crazy.



There used to be AAA/AA/A levels followed by B and C levels. Now there is not even one A team at 7/8 feeding into high schools. Those who had kids playing back 5-10 years ago know how competitive the 7/8AAA teams were. They would beat many high school varsity teams now.

The numbers playing club are falling off also. NGLL teams are not filling the spots vacated by those leaving NVYLL. When kids don’t have access to a local rec program at a young age they are not likely to jump right into club, they’re more likely just not going to play the sport. We are seeing the impact this is all having on public school lacrosse now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:How long will the BI transfer dads keep trolling BF. I get it your 3-6 not much to write about in the Private school forum.


It must suck paying all that private school tuition money for such a s*** program.
Anonymous
Lake Braddock L to West Po
AD should fire head coach Chen
Anonymous
Westpo parent I think Chen do the best he can with what he has!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Lake Braddock L to West Po
AD should fire head coach Chen


How many schools has he been at now… Chantilly, Herndon, Freedom, WestPo, Lake Braddock. Can’t seem to stay at one school and build a program.
post reply Forum Index » Lacrosse
Message Quick Reply
Go to: