Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My teenage daughter is devastated. She during covid she became depressed, lost on the internet, she/they etc. She found Charlie Kirk and TPU and it helped her clarify her values, turn to God, and make healthier choices. She sees people on Snapchat celebrating his death.

This assassination will only galvanize the conservative youth. God is moving among and through Gen Z men. They understand that laws will not save us, politics will not save us, only Jesus can save us. Christ is King.

Wow. Makes sense that your daughter is depressed.

DP.
Yes. Reasonable, compassionate people get depressed when good people are assassinated solely because of their views. It is an appropriate reaction to an act that is wholly senseless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Our politics seems to be entering a phase of "right supremacy" where only the lives of right-wingers have value. Assassinating the leader of a state legislative body in her own damn home was business as usual, but all of America has to have a reckoning if it's a far-right online influencer.

Right? If those saying, “this has to end now” had said that after the Minnesota assasination…Kirk might be alive.. 🤔

[Anonymous]

What is going to happen to the right wing narrative that this is the "radical left's" fault if the shooter turns out to be another white right wing gun nut?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3lykullxa2f2u

before we even know the identity of Charlie Kirk's shooter, Joni Ernst blames "the left" for "silencing voices through violence"


I love the way MAGA is jumping to these conclusions with ZERO proof or knowledge of who the shooter was/is and what their motivation is.

So yes, let's just blame the left and get every "second amendment friend" riled up for retribution.

(and then we will find out if was some mentally ill white guy with a gun who was mad at Kirk for dropping Epstein from the rotation of outrage, or something similar)

Republicans DGAF about facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kirk stepped out of line and said the Epstein files should be released. That could have upset some very powerful people.

I think that this is very related.

DP. I did not know him before South Park. What was his position on Israel, Epstein and Trump. I assume he was a loyal Trump supporter.

There’s a thread by a reporter in Texas that I posted last night that goes into detail on this. Here it is again:

Thanks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They found the gun

Killer of Charlie Kirk 'appears to be of college age,' police say, and 'blended in' with college population. - AP

This sounds unlikely.

The shooter was well trained. Shooting someone in the head from 200+ yards away and hitting him in the neck… this was not someone who was a weekend shooter.

DP. Hitting a target from 200 yards does require training, but there's a lot of practiced hunters and people with military training who could do it, including a lot of college aged people.

No sh*t Sherlock. A head shot, with a single round, from 200+ yards out, is marksmanship. This is not an individual that started shooting this month. He was formally trained.

- retired Marine.

Lol you're a moron. I was in the Marines. Day 2 of marksmanship training had 18 year olds shooting from 300+ meters with iron sights. The shooter missed high and the shot seems more impressive than it actually was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kirk would be alive if we had sensible gun laws. The right wing of America is off the charts when it comes to having rational gun policies and we are ally paying the price. They have full on embraced fascism. They are the ones who hate America and what it has stood for over the last 200 years. 40,000 Americas died from gun violence last year. Why is Kirk’s life more valuable than any of those who are nameless?

+1

I care 1000x more about the innocent school kids who were shot yesterday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My teenage daughter is devastated. She during covid she became depressed, lost on the internet, she/they etc. She found Charlie Kirk and TPU and it helped her clarify her values, turn to God, and make healthier choices. She sees people on Snapchat celebrating his death.

This assassination will only galvanize the conservative youth. God is moving among and through Gen Z men. They understand that laws will not save us, politics will not save us, only Jesus can save us. Christ is King.

Wow. Makes sense that your daughter is depressed.

DP.
Yes. Reasonable, compassionate people get depressed when good people are assassinated solely because of their views. It is an appropriate reaction to an act that is wholly senseless.

Ok, but we're talking about CK here. And if you have info on why he was shot, you should pass it along to the FBI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They found the gun

Killer of Charlie Kirk 'appears to be of college age,' police say, and 'blended in' with college population. - AP

This sounds unlikely.

The shooter was well trained. Shooting someone in the head from 200+ yards away and hitting him in the neck… this was not someone who was a weekend shooter.

DP. Hitting a target from 200 yards does require training, but there's a lot of practiced hunters and people with military training who could do it, including a lot of college aged people.

No sh*t Sherlock. A head shot, with a single round, from 200+ yards out, is marksmanship. This is not an individual that started shooting this month. He was formally trained.

- retired Marine.

And we will never know the true story. This administration will see to that. They have zero credibility at this point. They will make up their radical leftist narrative and shove it hard down everyone's throats to justify more militarization of our cities and to justify the violent retribution that Trump had been calling for all along.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kirk stepped out of line and said the Epstein files should be released. That could have upset some very powerful people.

I think that this is very related.

FFS.

You idiot.

I think it is just as plausible that someone who feels betrayed by Charlie Kirk (Loomer fanatic, anyone?) or who feels he isn't loyal enough to Trump would kill him as much as it s plausible it is someone from the left. After all, the right is well known for retributive violence.

This is a truly desperate attempt at deflection.
This will definitely be a post to revisit once the killer is caught.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kirk stepped out of line and said the Epstein files should be released. That could have upset some very powerful people.

Which is why the right wing outrage directed to the left is probably misplaced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like they have good photos of the assassins face. Looks like we will see who it was soon.

Note - they are referring to the murderer as “he”.

I find it interesting that the shooter is also described as being of "college age." I have never heard that as a description of a perp before.

I guess I can’t go to college since I’m 35.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our politics seems to be entering a phase of "right supremacy" where only the lives of right-wingers have value. Assassinating the leader of a state legislative body in her own damn home was business as usual, but all of America has to have a reckoning if it's a far-right online influencer.

Right? If those saying, “this has to end now” had said that after the Minnesota assasination…Kirk might be alive.. 🤔

Didn’t Kirk have a huge TiK Tok following? Trump refused to shut it down and now Kirk is dead. I can not help but wonder if it had been shut down would Kirk still be alive?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They found the gun

Killer of Charlie Kirk 'appears to be of college age,' police say, and 'blended in' with college population. - AP

This sounds unlikely.

The shooter was well trained. Shooting someone in the head from 200+ yards away and hitting him in the neck… this was not someone who was a weekend shooter.

DP. Hitting a target from 200 yards does require training, but there's a lot of practiced hunters and people with military training who could do it, including a lot of college aged people.

No sh*t Sherlock. A head shot, with a single round, from 200+ yards out, is marksmanship. This is not an individual that started shooting this month. He was formally trained.

- retired Marine.

Lol you're a moron. I was in the Marines. Day 2 of marksmanship training had 18 year olds shooting from 300+ meters with iron sights. The shooter missed high and the shot seems more impressive than it actually was.

One shot, one kill in a highly public, pressurized environment that will make worldwide news. INSANELY different than target shooting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is going to happen to the right wing narrative that this is the "radical left's" fault if the shooter turns out to be another white right wing gun nut?

Do you honestly think there is any chance of us hearing the truth about this shooter? Anything that doesn't suit the Trump admin narrative will be wiped away.