U.S. War against Iran

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we have any actual evidence that this hurt Iran’s nuclear program whatsoever? Because it’s looking more and more like it was a useless attack that did nothing effective.

So all of Iran's nuclear production facilities are still standing, and none of the IDF or USAF ordnance hit any such targets. Hey, I have a bridge for sale - wanna buy it?

Can you provide literally any proof that these attacks impacted Iran’s nuclear program whatsoever?

Its been 1 day, I doubt proof is available. There is definite proof that Iran is completely exposed at this point, a lot like our southern border under Biden.

We are deep enough into the Trump administration to not invoke Biden anymore. Try some different arguments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we have any actual evidence that this hurt Iran’s nuclear program whatsoever? Because it’s looking more and more like it was a useless attack that did nothing effective.

So all of Iran's nuclear production facilities are still standing, and none of the IDF or USAF ordnance hit any such targets. Hey, I have a bridge for sale - wanna buy it?

Can you provide literally any proof that these attacks impacted Iran’s nuclear program whatsoever?

Obviously it had an enormous impact. The degree to which will be unknown for some time. But does it really matter? The US has demonstrated that they can do this over and over again until there's a desired outcome.

So no proof. Got it.

Nobody owes you proof. You lost the election, get over it. Trump and Israel will bomb them as many times as it takes. They have air superiority. I would say F the fancy bombs, break out the B 52s and go old school. Quantity has its own Quality.

The President works for us. Don’t forget that.

He has carte Blanche for 4 years. You don’t forget that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we have any actual evidence that this hurt Iran’s nuclear program whatsoever? Because it’s looking more and more like it was a useless attack that did nothing effective.

So all of Iran's nuclear production facilities are still standing, and none of the IDF or USAF ordnance hit any such targets. Hey, I have a bridge for sale - wanna buy it?

Can you provide literally any proof that these attacks impacted Iran’s nuclear program whatsoever?

Obviously it had an enormous impact. The degree to which will be unknown for some time. But does it really matter? The US has demonstrated that they can do this over and over again until there's a desired outcome.

So no proof. Got it.

Guess what. The Iranian media and Russia Today have teamed up to push your narrative. Congratulations!

I mean, there is no evidence otherwise at this point. It’s not a narrative if it’s actually true.

[Anonymous]

If you are one of the people who supported this action, you are deep in the minority

https://today.yougov.com/topics/international/survey-results/daily/2025/06/22/ba0fb/2

June 21-22 poll of 2,408 U.S. adults (+/-2.4%)
More Americans disapprove than approve of the U.S. bombing of nuclear sites in Iran
% who approve | disapprove
U.S. adults 35% | 46%
Democrats 16% | 70%
Independents 27% | 51%
Republicans 68% | 13%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we have any actual evidence that this hurt Iran’s nuclear program whatsoever? Because it’s looking more and more like it was a useless attack that did nothing effective.

So all of Iran's nuclear production facilities are still standing, and none of the IDF or USAF ordnance hit any such targets. Hey, I have a bridge for sale - wanna buy it?

Can you provide literally any proof that these attacks impacted Iran’s nuclear program whatsoever?

Obviously it had an enormous impact. The degree to which will be unknown for some time. But does it really matter? The US has demonstrated that they can do this over and over again until there's a desired outcome.

So no proof. Got it.

Nobody owes you proof. You lost the election, get over it. Trump and Israel will bomb them as many times as it takes. They have air superiority. I would say F the fancy bombs, break out the B 52s and go old school. Quantity has its own Quality.

Sounds to me like you know the operation failed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we have any actual evidence that this hurt Iran’s nuclear program whatsoever? Because it’s looking more and more like it was a useless attack that did nothing effective.

So all of Iran's nuclear production facilities are still standing, and none of the IDF or USAF ordnance hit any such targets. Hey, I have a bridge for sale - wanna buy it?

Can you provide literally any proof that these attacks impacted Iran’s nuclear program whatsoever?

Insanity is just a state of mind. ^

Projecting as always.

You're doing a heckuva job! :mrgreen:

[Anonymous]

So, not obliterated.

These people are shameless.

[Anonymous]

They keep showing holes in the ground where the bombs supposedly drilled down 200 feet and exploded. Wouldn’t the ground collapse from the explosions and you wouldn’t see any holes?

[Anonymous]

The attack was a fail

[Anonymous]

Trump failed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They keep showing holes in the ground where the bombs supposedly drilled down 200 feet and exploded. Wouldn’t the ground collapse from the explosions and you wouldn’t see any holes?

It is a photoshop of Minecraft. We need to keep going.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we have any actual evidence that this hurt Iran’s nuclear program whatsoever? Because it’s looking more and more like it was a useless attack that did nothing effective.

So all of Iran's nuclear production facilities are still standing, and none of the IDF or USAF ordnance hit any such targets. Hey, I have a bridge for sale - wanna buy it?

So this is going to be permanent? Pissing off 16 Muslim countries in the middle East just to make one country (Israel) happy?

We are going to go bankrupt if we continue

Can you provide literally any proof that these attacks impacted Iran’s nuclear program whatsoever?

There is the psychological impact, the same kind that caused M. Qadafi of Libya to behave. It is a similar effect when America punched out the Barbary pirates. We’ve just told Iran, “You can now talk to the fist. We are done playing patty-cakes with you.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And what was the vietnam war? Congress never declared war there either and yet it went on for years.

POTUS is commander in chief and has executive authority to take immediate action in the interests of national security.

If you want to hang him, then hang him for the actual unconstitutional crap he has done. And there is a lot of it.

But our national security was not under immanent threat from Iran.

Was it under imminent threat from vietnam?

I would suggest that Iran's nuclear program is an imminent threat to everyone's national security.

Isn’t everyone’s nuclear arsenal a threat to global security?

It is. We made a terrible mistake after the end of the Cold War in allowing nuclear proliferation to... proliferate. North Korea and Pakistan are the big ones. There's no walking back now. They have them, and it changes things. Weirdo North Korea and unstable Pakistan are not countries we want with nukes. Regarding Iran, the world has spent twenty years encouraging Iran to keep things at the civilian level. Which would have been fine for everyone. Nothing wrong with nuclear energy.

But Iran went full on with enrichment to near weapons grade and they have a very advanced ballistic missile system. I don't like Trump, but he did the world a favor here. It's one thing if France or the UK or even Israel has nukes - stable democratic countries who would never use them in any kind of offensive capacity. It's an all together different thing with Iran - a repressive police state ruled by an 86 year old religious zealot with dreams of martyrdom. From Tel Aviv to Riyadh, the entire Middle East would face obliteration with an Iran with nukes. It's important to remember that Iran's issues are not just with Israel. But with the entire Sunni world.

Good for Trump for not being a TACO here. The entire planet is happy with this.

Allowing Israel to have nuclear weapon was the biggest mistake and the greatest threat to the continuation of the human race. The US providing arms and aid to Israel just compounds the problem.


It is too bad the US attacked Iran based on the lies propagated by Israel. Iran did have a nuclear weapon, did not have fissionable
material and was not taking any steps to develop a nuclear weapon.

It is important to remember Israel will not stop with Iran. Israelis are planing to attack Turkey next. All the problems in the Middle East can be traced back to Israel.

There is no controversy about whether Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons.
None.

Israel is more likely to attack the U.S. with a nuke than Iran is. If we want to make the world safer, we need to get rid of Israel’s nukes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump failed

Thats ok. Israel will be back at it tomorrow and every day after. Ask Hamas about it, if you can find one.

[Anonymous]

Israel is dangerous to humanity when run by their right wing extremists and not leftist Israelis. The right wingers hate Christians and Muslims and certainly don’t care if we all die if it suits Israel’s cause