Kevin Costner divorce

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why big age gap marriages don’t work for the most part. Christine is 51 and her new husband is 49. Kevin is in his 70s. She wanted a guy her age.

I don’t have sympathy for anyone involved, they all sound like garbage people.

only just, he turned 70 this year

I'm in my 40s and find him hot. Some guys like him, Pierce Brosnan, Paul Newman back in the day, are just hot even older. Christine's new dh is nowhere near as good looking.

Yea it’s not looks. Things change for men in their 60s and 70s. I’ll be happy to go on that journey with my DH if we are lucky enough to live that long. But I don’t want to be with a man in his 70s while I’m in my 40s or 50s. Apparently Christine didn’t either.

That's nice, dear. Enjoy your sh*t shack in PG county with your fat and bald fed hubby. And whomever Kevin dates will enjoy a $150 mil compound in Carpinteria and an A-list movie star lifestyle.

...and his 160-acre luxury ranch in Aspen, Colorado.

Gold digging doesn’t really work when the dude is cheap with his partners. He’s prob never going to get married again so what does a younger woman get in exchange? A few years of staying in someone else’s house? That’s how you end up like Tiger wood’s ex girlfriend.

Yeah, he seems cheap.

+1 and everything is "his." Eff that.

He's leaving his assets to his 7 kids not wife #3. This is not a Gene Hackman situation. Plus his Horizon films flopped, he's washed up. Maybe someone would be interested in living the good life for a decade or so. But then what?

I hope to god he doesn't have more kids. There is already a 26-year spread between the passel he has.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Christine’s a slut.

No one is a bigger slut than Kevin, but she legally can't talk about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why big age gap marriages don’t work for the most part. Christine is 51 and her new husband is 49. Kevin is in his 70s. She wanted a guy her age.

I don’t have sympathy for anyone involved, they all sound like garbage people.

only just, he turned 70 this year

I'm in my 40s and find him hot. Some guys like him, Pierce Brosnan, Paul Newman back in the day, are just hot even older. Christine's new dh is nowhere near as good looking.

Yea it’s not looks. Things change for men in their 60s and 70s. I’ll be happy to go on that journey with my DH if we are lucky enough to live that long. But I don’t want to be with a man in his 70s while I’m in my 40s or 50s. Apparently Christine didn’t either.

That's nice, dear. Enjoy your sh*t shack in PG county with your fat and bald fed hubby. And whomever Kevin dates will enjoy a $150 mil compound in Carpinteria and an A-list movie star lifestyle.

...and his 160-acre luxury ranch in Aspen, Colorado.

Gold digging doesn’t really work when the dude is cheap with his partners. He’s prob never going to get married again so what does a younger woman get in exchange? A few years of staying in someone else’s house? That’s how you end up like Tiger wood’s ex girlfriend.

Yeah, he seems cheap.

+1 and everything is "his." Eff that.

He's leaving his assets to his 7 kids not wife #3. This is not a Gene Hackman situation. Plus his Horizon films flopped, he's washed up. Maybe someone would be interested in living the good life for a decade or so. But then what?

I hope to god he doesn't have more kids. There is already a 26-year spread between the passel he has.

Why? He can afford it.

[Anonymous]

He doesn't come off great in this recent piece https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/kevin-costner-horizon-yellowstone-2-1236395016/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't come off great in this recent piece https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/kevin-costner-horizon-yellowstone-2-1236395016/

Who cares? Christine got her 1M + child support + the man she was seeing while married to Kevin. His attitude is no longer her problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't come off great in this recent piece https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/kevin-costner-horizon-yellowstone-2-1236395016/

Clearly an egomaniac. Do you know what marriage is like to someone like that? Don't know why people on this thread are defending him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't come off great in this recent piece https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/kevin-costner-horizon-yellowstone-2-1236395016/

Who cares? Christine got her 1M + child support + the man she was seeing while married to Kevin. His attitude is no longer her problem.

That's not much considering how much money he made during their marriage. The kids should be fine, however.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't come off great in this recent piece https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/kevin-costner-horizon-yellowstone-2-1236395016/

Who cares? Christine got her 1M + child support + the man she was seeing while married to Kevin. His attitude is no longer her problem.

That's not much considering how much money he made during their marriage. The kids should be fine, however.

Oh well. The beauty of the prenup was that she chose that life. She knew what she would get. Spending 100k a month on beauty treatments while married must have been worth it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't come off great in this recent piece https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/kevin-costner-horizon-yellowstone-2-1236395016/

Who cares? Christine got her 1M + child support + the man she was seeing while married to Kevin. His attitude is no longer her problem.

That's not much considering how much money he made during their marriage. The kids should be fine, however.

Oh well. The beauty of the prenup was that she chose that life. She knew what she would get. Spending 100k a month on beauty treatments while married must have been worth it.

There is NO WAY that sum is accurate. Maybe she got a mommy makeover at some point that cost that much, but as a monthly expense? Please. He was just trying to embarrass her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't come off great in this recent piece https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/kevin-costner-horizon-yellowstone-2-1236395016/

Who cares? Christine got her 1M + child support + the man she was seeing while married to Kevin. His attitude is no longer her problem.

That's not much considering how much money he made during their marriage. The kids should be fine, however.

Oh well. The beauty of the prenup was that she chose that life. She knew what she would get. Spending 100k a month on beauty treatments while married must have been worth it.

There is NO WAY that sum is accurate. Maybe she got a mommy makeover at some point that cost that much, but as a monthly expense? Please. He was just trying to embarrass her.

That is what she submitted when challenging the prenup. She had to submit her monthly expenses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't come off great in this recent piece https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/kevin-costner-horizon-yellowstone-2-1236395016/

Who cares? Christine got her 1M + child support + the man she was seeing while married to Kevin. His attitude is no longer her problem.

That's not much considering how much money he made during their marriage. The kids should be fine, however.

Oh well. The beauty of the prenup was that she chose that life. She knew what she would get. Spending 100k a month on beauty treatments while married must have been worth it.

There is NO WAY that sum is accurate. Maybe she got a mommy makeover at some point that cost that much, but as a monthly expense? Please. He was just trying to embarrass her.

That is what she submitted when challenging the prenup. She had to submit her monthly expenses.

She submitted $100K/month just for beauty treatments?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't come off great in this recent piece https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/kevin-costner-horizon-yellowstone-2-1236395016/

Who cares? Christine got her 1M + child support + the man she was seeing while married to Kevin. His attitude is no longer her problem.

That's not much considering how much money he made during their marriage. The kids should be fine, however.

Oh well. The beauty of the prenup was that she chose that life. She knew what she would get. Spending 100k a month on beauty treatments while married must have been worth it.

There is NO WAY that sum is accurate. Maybe she got a mommy makeover at some point that cost that much, but as a monthly expense? Please. He was just trying to embarrass her.

That is what she submitted when challenging the prenup. She had to submit her monthly expenses.

She submitted $100K/month just for beauty treatments?

She requested 248k per month in child support to “maintain” the kids standard of living. Based on what she submitted forensic accountants determined188k of the 248k was for her cosmetic treatments.

If you’re just joining this thread all of this was discussed previously. You ca. scroll back and find the details.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The mud slinging in this thread over the years is very strange and seemingly very inorganic. I doubt any middle aged mums in the DC region care about Costner to such a degree, let alone with such spirited disdain. Was the gold digging ex-wife and/or her reps deploying online smear tactics like we've seen detailed in those Blake Lively lawsuits? Sure seems like it.

Are you new here? This is the entertainment forum. The whole point is for people to post opinions and discuss gossip about celebs.

The conspiracy theories are a bit much . Kevin Costner is in the twilight of his career. Do you really think he’s paying people to go to a random mommy website in the DC area to post maybe a couple of dozen posts that he’s not old and not a cheater? To what end? Or conversely that his ex-wife is trying to salvage her reputation in the DC area? She’s not even an entertainer and she just married a wealthy financier plus she did fine in the divorce financially. I doubt she cares what anyone thinks.

It makes no sense.

Online smearing is not about DC moms, it's about using bots and employees and juke search engines and AI. The baseless smearing was nearly all ANTI-Costner.

I know how it all works, but it cost money and people who do it, like Blake lively, and Justin Baldoni, do it because there’s a lot of stake for them. I believe both of them engaged in this kind of behavior. Blake was trying to launch a brand new business and re-launch her movie career after years of having kids. Justin is in the early stages of launching a production company. The stakes are big for both of them and so I understand why they engage in this kind of behavior.

No one has explained why Christine, at least a year after her divorce, would still be paying bots and others to engage online about her ex-husband. She is not trying to launch a brand or do any kind of business, she is a private citizen and happy to stay that way. As evidenced in this thread, she spends her days going to lunch, doing beauty treatments, and shopping. She’s already remarried and moved on.

No one cares about Kevin Costner. This thread illustrates that perfectly. It’s filled with out of touch boomers who still think KC is handsome.

I completely believe maybe in the weeks after their divorce to look better Christine engaged in this kind of behavior, but to act as if she’s still paying people to do this kind of engagement is just out of touch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The mud slinging in this thread over the years is very strange and seemingly very inorganic. I doubt any middle aged mums in the DC region care about Costner to such a degree, let alone with such spirited disdain. Was the gold digging ex-wife and/or her reps deploying online smear tactics like we've seen detailed in those Blake Lively lawsuits? Sure seems like it.

Are you new here? This is the entertainment forum. The whole point is for people to post opinions and discuss gossip about celebs.

The conspiracy theories are a bit much . Kevin Costner is in the twilight of his career. Do you really think he’s paying people to go to a random mommy website in the DC area to post maybe a couple of dozen posts that he’s not old and not a cheater? To what end? Or conversely that his ex-wife is trying to salvage her reputation in the DC area? She’s not even an entertainer and she just married a wealthy financier plus she did fine in the divorce financially. I doubt she cares what anyone thinks.

It makes no sense.

Online smearing is not about DC moms, it's about using bots and employees and juke search engines and AI. The baseless smearing was nearly all ANTI-Costner.

I know how it all works, but it cost money and people who do it, like Blake lively, and Justin Baldoni, do it because there’s a lot of stake for them. I believe both of them engaged in this kind of behavior. Blake was trying to launch a brand new business and re-launch her movie career after years of having kids. Justin is in the early stages of launching a production company. The stakes are big for both of them and so I understand why they engage in this kind of behavior.

No one has explained why Christine, at least a year after her divorce, would still be paying bots and others to engage online about her ex-husband. She is not trying to launch a brand or do any kind of business, she is a private citizen and happy to stay that way. As evidenced in this thread, she spends her days going to lunch, doing beauty treatments, and shopping. She’s already remarried and moved on.

No one cares about Kevin Costner. This thread illustrates that perfectly. It’s filled with out of touch boomers who still think KC is handsome.

I completely believe maybe in the weeks after their divorce to look better Christine engaged in this kind of behavior, but to act as if she’s still paying people to do this kind of engagement is just out of touch.

A professional cyber smear campaign doesn't cost that much and message board crap is farmed out to interns, bot farms and overseas body shops. There was a lot at stake in trying to crack that pre-nup and projects he was involved in. Hundreds of millions of dollars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The mud slinging in this thread over the years is very strange and seemingly very inorganic. I doubt any middle aged mums in the DC region care about Costner to such a degree, let alone with such spirited disdain. Was the gold digging ex-wife and/or her reps deploying online smear tactics like we've seen detailed in those Blake Lively lawsuits? Sure seems like it.

Are you new here? This is the entertainment forum. The whole point is for people to post opinions and discuss gossip about celebs.

The conspiracy theories are a bit much . Kevin Costner is in the twilight of his career. Do you really think he’s paying people to go to a random mommy website in the DC area to post maybe a couple of dozen posts that he’s not old and not a cheater? To what end? Or conversely that his ex-wife is trying to salvage her reputation in the DC area? She’s not even an entertainer and she just married a wealthy financier plus she did fine in the divorce financially. I doubt she cares what anyone thinks.

It makes no sense.

Online smearing is not about DC moms, it's about using bots and employees and juke search engines and AI. The baseless smearing was nearly all ANTI-Costner.

I know how it all works, but it cost money and people who do it, like Blake lively, and Justin Baldoni, do it because there’s a lot of stake for them. I believe both of them engaged in this kind of behavior. Blake was trying to launch a brand new business and re-launch her movie career after years of having kids. Justin is in the early stages of launching a production company. The stakes are big for both of them and so I understand why they engage in this kind of behavior.

No one has explained why Christine, at least a year after her divorce, would still be paying bots and others to engage online about her ex-husband. She is not trying to launch a brand or do any kind of business, she is a private citizen and happy to stay that way. As evidenced in this thread, she spends her days going to lunch, doing beauty treatments, and shopping. She’s already remarried and moved on.

No one cares about Kevin Costner. This thread illustrates that perfectly. It’s filled with out of touch boomers who still think KC is handsome.

I completely believe maybe in the weeks after their divorce to look better Christine engaged in this kind of behavior, but to act as if she’s still paying people to do this kind of engagement is just out of touch.

A professional cyber smear campaign doesn't cost that much and message board crap is farmed out to interns, bot farms and overseas body shops. There was a lot at stake in trying to crack that pre-nup and projects he was involved in. Hundreds of millions of dollars.

Maybe but I get the sense she moved on a long time ago. However, she did get publicity for her wedding complete with the guests quoted as saying how wonderful it was like any standard entertainment article. The wedding dress and whole thing was tacky. Just go to the courthouse at this point. She doesn't come off well and neither does Costner. They are probably both awful.