What is your take on the Angelina Jolie/Brad Pitt divorce saga? What happened on the plane?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

This was all in the FBI report, nothing new. No-one is denying he was a total a-hole that day. He needed treatment for his alcoholism and got it, apparently was not abusive to the kids before that awful incident. I don't blame Jolie for divorcing him, but still don't think he deserved to be cut out of the kids' lives once he got clean.

It’s up to them, if they’re adults.

They've been brainwashed by a vindictive mother who insists on playing the victim years later. Is that not clear?

"Brainwashed" Get real. They know what they saw.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Jolie made sure those kids were enmeshed with her from the time they were small. How many times has she referred to their taking care of *her* in interviews? They don't want to upset fragile, suffering mom, and don't grasp they ways in which she screwed Brad over royally. They see her as the victim and feel the need to protect her from big, bad daddy. Which is how she's always characterized him, as the judge stated made sure they were afraid of him and loyal to her. I think he's totally capable of being a raging creep, as the plane incident clearly showed, but I also believe she manipulated the situation to get the outcome she desired. The kids, all for her. And as much money as possible. If she had supported a reasonable degree of co-parenting and hadn't sold majority control of the chateau to a hostile investor, this would have been settled a long time ago. But she keeps telling the kids he's intent on tormenting her, for no good reason. No good reason? Sure, Jan.

I agree with this.

It wouldn't have been settled because he doesn't want it settled.

What? She screwed him over with by selling majority control of the French estate. Who on earth would let that lie? That was all her, and no-one in their right mind thinks it's because of an NDA.

She did not have majority control to sell. She had equal control. Brad should not have reneged on the agreement of the sell by adding a NDA, and then offering ten-million-dollars less than the Russian. He should have matched the offer and removed that stupid NDA. What does he want now? He can't get the 50% control of the winery back. What exactly does he want from Angelina Jolie at this point? He is showing his vengeful, abusive behavior and hiding by PR.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

I have never clicked on this thread before and have never been interested in this saga. Curiosity got the best of me and first thing I see is this link.

I had no idea and reading that document was shocking to me. I never realized it was so bad.

PP here: this is why I posted it - I never realized how bad it actually was. He woke up from a nap and purposely dumped a beer on Angelina’s head while they were mid air. The kids were hiding under blankets because they were scared. That is psychotic behavior.

Really? Do you really have no experience with a volatile person (her) and how it can affect you? Living with someone with BPD can make you crazy - this applies to both Pitt and other exes and those poor kids.

FYI - pouring a drink on someone's head isn't nice but it isn't psychotic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

This was all in the FBI report, nothing new. No-one is denying he was a total a-hole that day. He needed treatment for his alcoholism and got it, apparently was not abusive to the kids before that awful incident. I don't blame Jolie for divorcing him, but still don't think he deserved to be cut out of the kids' lives once he got clean.

It’s up to them, if they’re adults.

They've been brainwashed by a vindictive mother who insists on playing the victim years later. Is that not clear?

"Brainwashed" Get real. They know what they saw.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Jolie made sure those kids were enmeshed with her from the time they were small. How many times has she referred to their taking care of *her* in interviews? They don't want to upset fragile, suffering mom, and don't grasp they ways in which she screwed Brad over royally. They see her as the victim and feel the need to protect her from big, bad daddy. Which is how she's always characterized him, as the judge stated made sure they were afraid of him and loyal to her. I think he's totally capable of being a raging creep, as the plane incident clearly showed, but I also believe she manipulated the situation to get the outcome she desired. The kids, all for her. And as much money as possible. If she had supported a reasonable degree of co-parenting and hadn't sold majority control of the chateau to a hostile investor, this would have been settled a long time ago. But she keeps telling the kids he's intent on tormenting her, for no good reason. No good reason? Sure, Jan.

I agree with this.

It wouldn't have been settled because he doesn't want it settled.

What? She screwed him over with by selling majority control of the French estate. Who on earth would let that lie? That was all her, and no-one in their right mind thinks it's because of an NDA.

She did not have majority control to sell. She had equal control. Brad should not have reneged on the agreement of the sell by adding a NDA, and then offering ten-million-dollars less than the Russian. He should have matched the offer and removed that stupid NDA. What does he want now? He can't get the 50% control of the winery back. What exactly does he want from Angelina Jolie at this point? He is showing his vengeful, abusive behavior and hiding by PR.

He wasn't aware she had a more lucrative counter-offer, because she negotiated that in secret. Why, you ask? To punish him for the custody ruling. Otherwise, she could have declined the NDA and told him to match the counter-offer or else. It was never about the NDA. Let them go to court. He'll be embarrassed but the truth will be clear about her actual motives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

This was all in the FBI report, nothing new. No-one is denying he was a total a-hole that day. He needed treatment for his alcoholism and got it, apparently was not abusive to the kids before that awful incident. I don't blame Jolie for divorcing him, but still don't think he deserved to be cut out of the kids' lives once he got clean.

It’s up to them, if they’re adults.

They've been brainwashed by a vindictive mother who insists on playing the victim years later. Is that not clear?

"Brainwashed" Get real. They know what they saw.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Jolie made sure those kids were enmeshed with her from the time they were small. How many times has she referred to their taking care of *her* in interviews? They don't want to upset fragile, suffering mom, and don't grasp they ways in which she screwed Brad over royally. They see her as the victim and feel the need to protect her from big, bad daddy. Which is how she's always characterized him, as the judge stated made sure they were afraid of him and loyal to her. I think he's totally capable of being a raging creep, as the plane incident clearly showed, but I also believe she manipulated the situation to get the outcome she desired. The kids, all for her. And as much money as possible. If she had supported a reasonable degree of co-parenting and hadn't sold majority control of the chateau to a hostile investor, this would have been settled a long time ago. But she keeps telling the kids he's intent on tormenting her, for no good reason. No good reason? Sure, Jan.

I agree with this.

It wouldn't have been settled because he doesn't want it settled.

What? She screwed him over with by selling majority control of the French estate. Who on earth would let that lie? That was all her, and no-one in their right mind thinks it's because of an NDA.

She did not have majority control to sell. She had equal control. Brad should not have reneged on the agreement of the sell by adding a NDA, and then offering ten-million-dollars less than the Russian. He should have matched the offer and removed that stupid NDA. What does he want now? He can't get the 50% control of the winery back. What exactly does he want from Angelina Jolie at this point? He is showing his vengeful, abusive behavior and hiding by PR.

He wasn't aware she had a more lucrative counter-offer, because she negotiated that in secret. Why, you ask? To punish him for the custody ruling. Otherwise, she could have declined the NDA and told him to match the counter-offer or else. It was never about the NDA. Let them go to court. He'll be embarrassed but the truth will be clear about her actual motives.

That isn't true. Brad changed the NDA terms before She was ever contacted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

I have never clicked on this thread before and have never been interested in this saga. Curiosity got the best of me and first thing I see is this link.

I had no idea and reading that document was shocking to me. I never realized it was so bad.

PP here: this is why I posted it - I never realized how bad it actually was. He woke up from a nap and purposely dumped a beer on Angelina’s head while they were mid air. The kids were hiding under blankets because they were scared. That is psychotic behavior.

Really? Do you really have no experience with a volatile person (her) and how it can affect you? Living with someone with BPD can make you crazy - this applies to both Pitt and other exes and those poor kids.

FYI - pouring a drink on someone's head isn't nice but it isn't psychotic.

It is 100% psychotic to pour beer knowing you're are under the sheets as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

This was all in the FBI report, nothing new. No-one is denying he was a total a-hole that day. He needed treatment for his alcoholism and got it, apparently was not abusive to the kids before that awful incident. I don't blame Jolie for divorcing him, but still don't think he deserved to be cut out of the kids' lives once he got clean.

It’s up to them, if they’re adults.

They've been brainwashed by a vindictive mother who insists on playing the victim years later. Is that not clear?

"Brainwashed" Get real. They know what they saw.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Jolie made sure those kids were enmeshed with her from the time they were small. How many times has she referred to their taking care of *her* in interviews? They don't want to upset fragile, suffering mom, and don't grasp they ways in which she screwed Brad over royally. They see her as the victim and feel the need to protect her from big, bad daddy. Which is how she's always characterized him, as the judge stated made sure they were afraid of him and loyal to her. I think he's totally capable of being a raging creep, as the plane incident clearly showed, but I also believe she manipulated the situation to get the outcome she desired. The kids, all for her. And as much money as possible. If she had supported a reasonable degree of co-parenting and hadn't sold majority control of the chateau to a hostile investor, this would have been settled a long time ago. But she keeps telling the kids he's intent on tormenting her, for no good reason. No good reason? Sure, Jan.

I agree with this.

It wouldn't have been settled because he doesn't want it settled.

What? She screwed him over with by selling majority control of the French estate. Who on earth would let that lie? That was all her, and no-one in their right mind thinks it's because of an NDA.

She did not have majority control to sell. She had equal control. Brad should not have reneged on the agreement of the sell by adding a NDA, and then offering ten-million-dollars less than the Russian. He should have matched the offer and removed that stupid NDA. What does he want now? He can't get the 50% control of the winery back. What exactly does he want from Angelina Jolie at this point? He is showing his vengeful, abusive behavior and hiding by PR.

+1. He wants his way while also keeping the abuse under wraps. Is he not aware of how lawsuits works. He spent all this time and money trying to bury what happened only for his personal messages about it to be released. That's more then embarrassing when you have a +300 million dollar project on the line

[Anonymous]

I am too lazy to find what page the comment is on but this is to the person who asked about his pr boss being involved with the settlement talks: they're protecting their money. They know what will happen if this contuines and are trying to squash it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

I have never clicked on this thread before and have never been interested in this saga. Curiosity got the best of me and first thing I see is this link.

I had no idea and reading that document was shocking to me. I never realized it was so bad.

PP here: this is why I posted it - I never realized how bad it actually was. He woke up from a nap and purposely dumped a beer on Angelina’s head while they were mid air. The kids were hiding under blankets because they were scared. That is psychotic behavior.

Really? Do you really have no experience with a volatile person (her) and how it can affect you? Living with someone with BPD can make you crazy - this applies to both Pitt and other exes and those poor kids.

FYI - pouring a drink on someone's head isn't nice but it isn't psychotic.

Way to blame the victim. Pouring drinks on your wife and children is a way of humiliating and intimidating them. It was also only one part of an hours long assault on Angelina Jolie and the children. You obviously didn’t read the document.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

This was all in the FBI report, nothing new. No-one is denying he was a total a-hole that day. He needed treatment for his alcoholism and got it, apparently was not abusive to the kids before that awful incident. I don't blame Jolie for divorcing him, but still don't think he deserved to be cut out of the kids' lives once he got clean.

It’s up to them, if they’re adults.

They've been brainwashed by a vindictive mother who insists on playing the victim years later. Is that not clear?

"Brainwashed" Get real. They know what they saw.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Jolie made sure those kids were enmeshed with her from the time they were small. How many times has she referred to their taking care of *her* in interviews? They don't want to upset fragile, suffering mom, and don't grasp they ways in which she screwed Brad over royally. They see her as the victim and feel the need to protect her from big, bad daddy. Which is how she's always characterized him, as the judge stated made sure they were afraid of him and loyal to her. I think he's totally capable of being a raging creep, as the plane incident clearly showed, but I also believe she manipulated the situation to get the outcome she desired. The kids, all for her. And as much money as possible. If she had supported a reasonable degree of co-parenting and hadn't sold majority control of the chateau to a hostile investor, this would have been settled a long time ago. But she keeps telling the kids he's intent on tormenting her, for no good reason. No good reason? Sure, Jan.

I agree with this.

It wouldn't have been settled because he doesn't want it settled.

What? She screwed him over with by selling majority control of the French estate. Who on earth would let that lie? That was all her, and no-one in their right mind thinks it's because of an NDA.

She did not have majority control to sell. She had equal control. Brad should not have reneged on the agreement of the sell by adding a NDA, and then offering ten-million-dollars less than the Russian. He should have matched the offer and removed that stupid NDA. What does he want now? He can't get the 50% control of the winery back. What exactly does he want from Angelina Jolie at this point? He is showing his vengeful, abusive behavior and hiding by PR.

He wasn't aware she had a more lucrative counter-offer, because she negotiated that in secret. Why, you ask? To punish him for the custody ruling. Otherwise, she could have declined the NDA and told him to match the counter-offer or else. It was never about the NDA. Let them go to court. He'll be embarrassed but the truth will be clear about her actual motives.

DP. This isn’t a charity. The fact that she had a substantially more lucrative offer suggests that there objective matrices indicating that the share was worth way more than he was offering. And usually when a NDA is included that adds a premium to the price. Which is how Elin Nodregreen got more than half of tiger’s net worth in their divorce. Brad’s issue is that in addition to being a terrible person he is cheap. In the vast majority of instances where things are sold you don’t know the price everyone else is offering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

This was all in the FBI report, nothing new. No-one is denying he was a total a-hole that day. He needed treatment for his alcoholism and got it, apparently was not abusive to the kids before that awful incident. I don't blame Jolie for divorcing him, but still don't think he deserved to be cut out of the kids' lives once he got clean.

It’s up to them, if they’re adults.

They've been brainwashed by a vindictive mother who insists on playing the victim years later. Is that not clear?

"Brainwashed" Get real. They know what they saw.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Jolie made sure those kids were enmeshed with her from the time they were small. How many times has she referred to their taking care of *her* in interviews? They don't want to upset fragile, suffering mom, and don't grasp they ways in which she screwed Brad over royally. They see her as the victim and feel the need to protect her from big, bad daddy. Which is how she's always characterized him, as the judge stated made sure they were afraid of him and loyal to her. I think he's totally capable of being a raging creep, as the plane incident clearly showed, but I also believe she manipulated the situation to get the outcome she desired. The kids, all for her. And as much money as possible. If she had supported a reasonable degree of co-parenting and hadn't sold majority control of the chateau to a hostile investor, this would have been settled a long time ago. But she keeps telling the kids he's intent on tormenting her, for no good reason. No good reason? Sure, Jan.

I agree with this.

It wouldn't have been settled because he doesn't want it settled.

What? She screwed him over with by selling majority control of the French estate. Who on earth would let that lie? That was all her, and no-one in their right mind thinks it's because of an NDA.

She did not have majority control to sell. She had equal control. Brad should not have reneged on the agreement of the sell by adding a NDA, and then offering ten-million-dollars less than the Russian. He should have matched the offer and removed that stupid NDA. What does he want now? He can't get the 50% control of the winery back. What exactly does he want from Angelina Jolie at this point? He is showing his vengeful, abusive behavior and hiding by PR.

He wasn't aware she had a more lucrative counter-offer, because she negotiated that in secret. Why, you ask? To punish him for the custody ruling. Otherwise, she could have declined the NDA and told him to match the counter-offer or else. It was never about the NDA. Let them go to court. He'll be embarrassed but the truth will be clear about her actual motives.

DP. This isn’t a charity. The fact that she had a substantially more lucrative offer suggests that they're objective matrices indicating that the share was worth way more than he was offering. And usually when a NDA is included that adds a premium to the price. Which is how Elin Nodregreen got more than half of tiger’s net worth in their divorce. Brad’s issue is that in addition to being a terrible person he is cheap. In the vast majority of instances where things are sold you don’t know the price everyone else is offering.

Yes, and now her kids will not get half of that estate which they bought for the family. Or any of it, now that he'll need to worry about the business's future. If she had told him to match the offer, he would have had to pay up and drop the NDA as well. So why didn't she give him that opportunity? She could have gotten every single thing she wanted by negotiating peacefully. It's almost as if she wanted to screw him over, hmm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

This was all in the FBI report, nothing new. No-one is denying he was a total a-hole that day. He needed treatment for his alcoholism and got it, apparently was not abusive to the kids before that awful incident. I don't blame Jolie for divorcing him, but still don't think he deserved to be cut out of the kids' lives once he got clean.

It’s up to them, if they’re adults.

They've been brainwashed by a vindictive mother who insists on playing the victim years later. Is that not clear?

"Brainwashed" Get real. They know what they saw.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Jolie made sure those kids were enmeshed with her from the time they were small. How many times has she referred to their taking care of *her* in interviews? They don't want to upset fragile, suffering mom, and don't grasp they ways in which she screwed Brad over royally. They see her as the victim and feel the need to protect her from big, bad daddy. Which is how she's always characterized him, as the judge stated made sure they were afraid of him and loyal to her. I think he's totally capable of being a raging creep, as the plane incident clearly showed, but I also believe she manipulated the situation to get the outcome she desired. The kids, all for her. And as much money as possible. If she had supported a reasonable degree of co-parenting and hadn't sold majority control of the chateau to a hostile investor, this would have been settled a long time ago. But she keeps telling the kids he's intent on tormenting her, for no good reason. No good reason? Sure, Jan.

I agree with this.

It wouldn't have been settled because he doesn't want it settled.

What? She screwed him over with by selling majority control of the French estate. Who on earth would let that lie? That was all her, and no-one in their right mind thinks it's because of an NDA.

She did not have majority control to sell. She had equal control. Brad should not have reneged on the agreement of the sell by adding a NDA, and then offering ten-million-dollars less than the Russian. He should have matched the offer and removed that stupid NDA. What does he want now? He can't get the 50% control of the winery back. What exactly does he want from Angelina Jolie at this point? He is showing his vengeful, abusive behavior and hiding by PR.

He wasn't aware she had a more lucrative counter-offer, because she negotiated that in secret. Why, you ask? To punish him for the custody ruling. Otherwise, she could have declined the NDA and told him to match the counter-offer or else. It was never about the NDA. Let them go to court. He'll be embarrassed but the truth will be clear about her actual motives.

DP. This isn’t a charity. The fact that she had a substantially more lucrative offer suggests that they're objective matrices indicating that the share was worth way more than he was offering. And usually when a NDA is included that adds a premium to the price. Which is how Elin Nodregreen got more than half of tiger’s net worth in their divorce. Brad’s issue is that in addition to being a terrible person he is cheap. In the vast majority of instances where things are sold you don’t know the price everyone else is offering.

Yes, and now her kids will not get half of that estate which they bought for the family. Or any of it, now that he'll need to worry about the business's future. If she had told him to match the offer, he would have had to pay up and drop the NDA as well. So why didn't she give him that opportunity? She could have gotten every single thing she wanted by negotiating peacefully. It's almost as if she wanted to screw him over, hmm.

She knew what selling to a man like Shefler would do to Pitt. The fact that she included the 10% he gifted her for their wedding was a massive eff you. Since having a 50% partner meant he effectively lost control of his business, of course Pitt was determined to undo the sale if possible. If the court rules in his favor, she will end up owing him a lot of money rather than the other way around. And I think he's suing for damages? Very high stakes, for both of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

This was all in the FBI report, nothing new. No-one is denying he was a total a-hole that day. He needed treatment for his alcoholism and got it, apparently was not abusive to the kids before that awful incident. I don't blame Jolie for divorcing him, but still don't think he deserved to be cut out of the kids' lives once he got clean.

It’s up to them, if they’re adults.

They've been brainwashed by a vindictive mother who insists on playing the victim years later. Is that not clear?

"Brainwashed" Get real. They know what they saw.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Jolie made sure those kids were enmeshed with her from the time they were small. How many times has she referred to their taking care of *her* in interviews? They don't want to upset fragile, suffering mom, and don't grasp they ways in which she screwed Brad over royally. They see her as the victim and feel the need to protect her from big, bad daddy. Which is how she's always characterized him, as the judge stated made sure they were afraid of him and loyal to her. I think he's totally capable of being a raging creep, as the plane incident clearly showed, but I also believe she manipulated the situation to get the outcome she desired. The kids, all for her. And as much money as possible. If she had supported a reasonable degree of co-parenting and hadn't sold majority control of the chateau to a hostile investor, this would have been settled a long time ago. But she keeps telling the kids he's intent on tormenting her, for no good reason. No good reason? Sure, Jan.

I agree with this.

It wouldn't have been settled because he doesn't want it settled.

What? She screwed him over with by selling majority control of the French estate. Who on earth would let that lie? That was all her, and no-one in their right mind thinks it's because of an NDA.

She did not have majority control to sell. She had equal control. Brad should not have reneged on the agreement of the sell by adding a NDA, and then offering ten-million-dollars less than the Russian. He should have matched the offer and removed that stupid NDA. What does he want now? He can't get the 50% control of the winery back. What exactly does he want from Angelina Jolie at this point? He is showing his vengeful, abusive behavior and hiding by PR.

He wasn't aware she had a more lucrative counter-offer, because she negotiated that in secret. Why, you ask? To punish him for the custody ruling. Otherwise, she could have declined the NDA and told him to match the counter-offer or else. It was never about the NDA. Let them go to court. He'll be embarrassed but the truth will be clear about her actual motives.

DP. This isn’t a charity. The fact that she had a substantially more lucrative offer suggests that they're objective matrices indicating that the share was worth way more than he was offering. And usually when a NDA is included that adds a premium to the price. Which is how Elin Nodregreen got more than half of tiger’s net worth in their divorce. Brad’s issue is that in addition to being a terrible person he is cheap. In the vast majority of instances where things are sold you don’t know the price everyone else is offering.

Yes, and now her kids will not get half of that estate which they bought for the family. Or any of it, now that he'll need to worry about the business's future. If she had told him to match the offer, he would have had to pay up and drop the NDA as well. So why didn't she give him that opportunity? She could have gotten every single thing she wanted by negotiating peacefully. It's almost as if she wanted to screw him over, hmm.

She knew what selling to a man like Shefler would do to Pitt. The fact that she included the 10% he gifted her for their wedding was a massive eff you. Since having a 50% partner meant he effectively lost control of his business, of course Pitt was determined to undo the sale if possible. If the court rules in his favor, she will end up owing him a lot of money rather than the other way around. And I think he's suing for damages? Very high stakes, for both of them.

He was stupid for giving her those shares in the first place. By all accounts their relationship was on thin ice at that point. And she was truly awful for sticking it to him regarding Miraval.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

This was all in the FBI report, nothing new. No-one is denying he was a total a-hole that day. He needed treatment for his alcoholism and got it, apparently was not abusive to the kids before that awful incident. I don't blame Jolie for divorcing him, but still don't think he deserved to be cut out of the kids' lives once he got clean.

It’s up to them, if they’re adults.

They've been brainwashed by a vindictive mother who insists on playing the victim years later. Is that not clear?

"Brainwashed" Get real. They know what they saw.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Jolie made sure those kids were enmeshed with her from the time they were small. How many times has she referred to their taking care of *her* in interviews? They don't want to upset fragile, suffering mom, and don't grasp they ways in which she screwed Brad over royally. They see her as the victim and feel the need to protect her from big, bad daddy. Which is how she's always characterized him, as the judge stated made sure they were afraid of him and loyal to her. I think he's totally capable of being a raging creep, as the plane incident clearly showed, but I also believe she manipulated the situation to get the outcome she desired. The kids, all for her. And as much money as possible. If she had supported a reasonable degree of co-parenting and hadn't sold majority control of the chateau to a hostile investor, this would have been settled a long time ago. But she keeps telling the kids he's intent on tormenting her, for no good reason. No good reason? Sure, Jan.

I agree with this.

It wouldn't have been settled because he doesn't want it settled.

What? She screwed him over with by selling majority control of the French estate. Who on earth would let that lie? That was all her, and no-one in their right mind thinks it's because of an NDA.

She did not have majority control to sell. She had equal control. Brad should not have reneged on the agreement of the sell by adding a NDA, and then offering ten-million-dollars less than the Russian. He should have matched the offer and removed that stupid NDA. What does he want now? He can't get the 50% control of the winery back. What exactly does he want from Angelina Jolie at this point? He is showing his vengeful, abusive behavior and hiding by PR.

He wasn't aware she had a more lucrative counter-offer, because she negotiated that in secret. Why, you ask? To punish him for the custody ruling. Otherwise, she could have declined the NDA and told him to match the counter-offer or else. It was never about the NDA. Let them go to court. He'll be embarrassed but the truth will be clear about her actual motives.

DP. This isn’t a charity. The fact that she had a substantially more lucrative offer suggests that they're objective matrices indicating that the share was worth way more than he was offering. And usually when a NDA is included that adds a premium to the price. Which is how Elin Nodregreen got more than half of tiger’s net worth in their divorce. Brad’s issue is that in addition to being a terrible person he is cheap. In the vast majority of instances where things are sold you don’t know the price everyone else is offering.

Yes, and now her kids will not get half of that estate which they bought for the family. Or any of it, now that he'll need to worry about the business's future. If she had told him to match the offer, he would have had to pay up and drop the NDA as well. So why didn't she give him that opportunity? She could have gotten every single thing she wanted by negotiating peacefully. It's almost as if she wanted to screw him over, hmm.

She knew what selling to a man like Shefler would do to Pitt. The fact that she included the 10% he gifted her for their wedding was a massive eff you. Since having a 50% partner meant he effectively lost control of his business, of course Pitt was determined to undo the sale if possible. If the court rules in his favor, she will end up owing him a lot of money rather than the other way around. And I think he's suing for damages? Very high stakes, for both of them.

It's not going to court with her getting his emails/text messages about the abuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

This was all in the FBI report, nothing new. No-one is denying he was a total a-hole that day. He needed treatment for his alcoholism and got it, apparently was not abusive to the kids before that awful incident. I don't blame Jolie for divorcing him, but still don't think he deserved to be cut out of the kids' lives once he got clean.

It’s up to them, if they’re adults.

They've been brainwashed by a vindictive mother who insists on playing the victim years later. Is that not clear?

"Brainwashed" Get real. They know what they saw.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Jolie made sure those kids were enmeshed with her from the time they were small. How many times has she referred to their taking care of *her* in interviews? They don't want to upset fragile, suffering mom, and don't grasp they ways in which she screwed Brad over royally. They see her as the victim and feel the need to protect her from big, bad daddy. Which is how she's always characterized him, as the judge stated made sure they were afraid of him and loyal to her. I think he's totally capable of being a raging creep, as the plane incident clearly showed, but I also believe she manipulated the situation to get the outcome she desired. The kids, all for her. And as much money as possible. If she had supported a reasonable degree of co-parenting and hadn't sold majority control of the chateau to a hostile investor, this would have been settled a long time ago. But she keeps telling the kids he's intent on tormenting her, for no good reason. No good reason? Sure, Jan.

I agree with this.

It wouldn't have been settled because he doesn't want it settled.

What? She screwed him over with by selling majority control of the French estate. Who on earth would let that lie? That was all her, and no-one in their right mind thinks it's because of an NDA.

She did not have majority control to sell. She had equal control. Brad should not have reneged on the agreement of the sell by adding a NDA, and then offering ten-million-dollars less than the Russian. He should have matched the offer and removed that stupid NDA. What does he want now? He can't get the 50% control of the winery back. What exactly does he want from Angelina Jolie at this point? He is showing his vengeful, abusive behavior and hiding by PR.

He wasn't aware she had a more lucrative counter-offer, because she negotiated that in secret. Why, you ask? To punish him for the custody ruling. Otherwise, she could have declined the NDA and told him to match the counter-offer or else. It was never about the NDA. Let them go to court. He'll be embarrassed but the truth will be clear about her actual motives.

DP. This isn’t a charity. The fact that she had a substantially more lucrative offer suggests that they're objective matrices indicating that the share was worth way more than he was offering. And usually when a NDA is included that adds a premium to the price. Which is how Elin Nodregreen got more than half of tiger’s net worth in their divorce. Brad’s issue is that in addition to being a terrible person he is cheap. In the vast majority of instances where things are sold you don’t know the price everyone else is offering.

Yes, and now her kids will not get half of that estate which they bought for the family. Or any of it, now that he'll need to worry about the business's future. If she had told him to match the offer, he would have had to pay up and drop the NDA as well. So why didn't she give him that opportunity? She could have gotten every single thing she wanted by negotiating peacefully. It's almost as if she wanted to screw him over, hmm.

She knew what selling to a man like Shefler would do to Pitt. The fact that she included the 10% he gifted her for their wedding was a massive eff you. Since having a 50% partner meant he effectively lost control of his business, of course Pitt was determined to undo the sale if possible. If the court rules in his favor, she will end up owing him a lot of money rather than the other way around. And I think he's suing for damages? Very high stakes, for both of them.

It's not going to court with her getting his emails/text messages about the abuse.

The detailed account of his abuse is already out there. Unless there's more, he has little to lose at this point. She has a lot to lose, both in terms of PR and monetarily. If he does settle, we'll know there is a lot more to his abuse. If not, he feels in the right and confident he'll win. We shall see.

But back to the kids--they only see that their dad is continuing to hurt and upset their mom. They wouldn't understand this from his perspective, but maybe they will when they're older.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abuse document posted to Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/nbrA5HRBSW

Really bad for Pitt.

This was all in the FBI report, nothing new. No-one is denying he was a total a-hole that day. He needed treatment for his alcoholism and got it, apparently was not abusive to the kids before that awful incident. I don't blame Jolie for divorcing him, but still don't think he deserved to be cut out of the kids' lives once he got clean.

It’s up to them, if they’re adults.

They've been brainwashed by a vindictive mother who insists on playing the victim years later. Is that not clear?

"Brainwashed" Get real. They know what they saw.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Jolie made sure those kids were enmeshed with her from the time they were small. How many times has she referred to their taking care of *her* in interviews? They don't want to upset fragile, suffering mom, and don't grasp they ways in which she screwed Brad over royally. They see her as the victim and feel the need to protect her from big, bad daddy. Which is how she's always characterized him, as the judge stated made sure they were afraid of him and loyal to her. I think he's totally capable of being a raging creep, as the plane incident clearly showed, but I also believe she manipulated the situation to get the outcome she desired. The kids, all for her. And as much money as possible. If she had supported a reasonable degree of co-parenting and hadn't sold majority control of the chateau to a hostile investor, this would have been settled a long time ago. But she keeps telling the kids he's intent on tormenting her, for no good reason. No good reason? Sure, Jan.

I agree with this.

It wouldn't have been settled because he doesn't want it settled.

What? She screwed him over with by selling majority control of the French estate. Who on earth would let that lie? That was all her, and no-one in their right mind thinks it's because of an NDA.

She did not have majority control to sell. She had equal control. Brad should not have reneged on the agreement of the sell by adding a NDA, and then offering ten-million-dollars less than the Russian. He should have matched the offer and removed that stupid NDA. What does he want now? He can't get the 50% control of the winery back. What exactly does he want from Angelina Jolie at this point? He is showing his vengeful, abusive behavior and hiding by PR.

He wasn't aware she had a more lucrative counter-offer, because she negotiated that in secret. Why, you ask? To punish him for the custody ruling. Otherwise, she could have declined the NDA and told him to match the counter-offer or else. It was never about the NDA. Let them go to court. He'll be embarrassed but the truth will be clear about her actual motives.

DP. This isn’t a charity. The fact that she had a substantially more lucrative offer suggests that they're objective matrices indicating that the share was worth way more than he was offering. And usually when a NDA is included that adds a premium to the price. Which is how Elin Nodregreen got more than half of tiger’s net worth in their divorce. Brad’s issue is that in addition to being a terrible person he is cheap. In the vast majority of instances where things are sold you don’t know the price everyone else is offering.

Yes, and now her kids will not get half of that estate which they bought for the family. Or any of it, now that he'll need to worry about the business's future. If she had told him to match the offer, he would have had to pay up and drop the NDA as well. So why didn't she give him that opportunity? She could have gotten every single thing she wanted by negotiating peacefully. It's almost as if she wanted to screw him over, hmm.

She knew what selling to a man like Shefler would do to Pitt. The fact that she included the 10% he gifted her for their wedding was a massive eff you. Since having a 50% partner meant he effectively lost control of his business, of course Pitt was determined to undo the sale if possible. If the court rules in his favor, she will end up owing him a lot of money rather than the other way around. And I think he's suing for damages? Very high stakes, for both of them.

It's not going to court with her getting his emails/text messages about the abuse.

The detailed account of his abuse is already out there. Unless there's more, he has little to lose at this point. She has a lot to lose, both in terms of PR and monetarily. If he does settle, we'll know there is a lot more to his abuse. If not, he feels in the right and confident he'll win. We shall see.

But back to the kids--they only see that their dad is continuing to hurt and upset their mom. They wouldn't understand this from his perspective, but maybe they will when they're older.

But isn't his story that the detailed account of the abuse that's public here is fake? He's going to be caught in a lie with his own words. Not to mention the discussions to burry the abuse with his PR company. He has FAR more to lose. Thats why he was fighting so hard to prohibit her from talking about.