Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I, for one, am happy she's defending herself. Kane is a dickbag. She needs an anonymous outlet to give it back to him
Yes, but at the same time she's crowned herself the queen of classy by blogging about how it's a mistake to badmouth the father of her kids/she's not going to do it anymore. So to do that then come on an anonymous forum and trash him kind of negates that, lol
That being said, she was defending herself on here (and very haughtily, I might add, lol), not bashing Kane. Unfortunately all that response did was confirm to me that her issues (accidents + her fall) are a result of her meds. I don't think she abuses them as in she takes too much, but she should not be taking them if she's not 100% sure of her safety (and more importantly the safety of the girls).
And she was mighty defensive about the insinuation that she was a pill popper. Where there's smoke, there's fire. I'm going to go ahead and assume that her pill usage and consequent car accidents/falls/etc. are all a HUGE issue of contention in their divorce. She appears to continue to add fuel to the fire with her actions. The sad thing is, compared to Kane being an unreasonable control freak, her being on such dangerous meds (for whatever reason) is a much more damaging prospect for their family.
Agreed. She doth protest too much. I think Kane's a dick but I genuinely think he fears for his daughters' safety when they are with her. The fall/head injury makes so much sense now. I thought her blog post was just so odd... It had way too many little details and reminded me of how when someone is lying they always add kind of silly extraneous details to the narrative because they think it makes the story sound more believable. That is the vibe I got from that post. It reeked of "oh shit, he might try to take the girls away, let me painstakingly explain how my pills were NOT the reason for this disaster."
Oof. Sad situation for all. I hope she's at least stopped taking the pills if only for their daughters' sake.
Agree 100%. Like this part:
"During the week of school being canceled we had to get pretty creative on ways to keep the kids entertained. I had two huge boxes that hadn’t been broken down yet for recycling so I set them up in the living room with a bin of markers, stickers, pillows & blankets & let the girls go to town on creating their own little houses. Man, they loved those boxes, I think they’d still be living in them if I let them. Unfortunately for the box apartments I saw another use for them. I thought if I cut off the side flaps, you know, that would normally be used to close the boxes, I could maybe finagle them under the front two tires to hopefully give the van just enough traction to get out of the snow."
When I read it my reaction was
Why the hell is she telling us the background of the friggin' cardboard boxes? Wouldn't it be easier to say "We had some empty cardboard boxes in the garage that I figured I could use to give the van traction."
Little things like that made it ring false for me, too. She was trying too hard.