The Kane Show (Part 4)

[Anonymous]

this thread has really picked up this evening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, for one, am happy she's defending herself. Kane is a dickbag. She needs an anonymous outlet to give it back to him

Yes, but at the same time she's crowned herself the queen of classy by blogging about how it's a mistake to badmouth the father of her kids/she's not going to do it anymore. So to do that then come on an anonymous forum and trash him kind of negates that, lol

That being said, she was defending herself on here (and very haughtily, I might add, lol), not bashing Kane. Unfortunately all that response did was confirm to me that her issues (accidents + her fall) are a result of her meds. I don't think she abuses them as in she takes too much, but she should not be taking them if she's not 100% sure of her safety (and more importantly the safety of the girls).

But she's posted before about her medical issues, it was safe to assume she was on medications for them. When people insinuated she was abusing them, she just defended the reasons for taking them in the first place. Who knows, maybe if she didn't take them she would be in much more danger while doing the day to day things like driving or whatever. I know my anti anxiety meds can make me tired, but having an anxiety attack behind the wheel is much more scary.

[Anonymous]

At least she's smarter than Danni and not flaming the board with "I'M NOT DANNI" posts/posting on her social media about internet thugs. She probably saw she was caught, shrugged, and logged off. Or at least that's what I'm hoping she did.

I'm honestly surprised she reads this forum. I know she blogged about it years ago when there was a thread calling her blog dumb (oh, I bet she longs for those days!) but seems masochistic now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What tickles me about this is Natasha hasn't been a big topic of discussion overall on this thread (I'd say this one has been 80% Danni and her non-stop disasters). Does she read this just to get her jollies and see what mean things people are saying about her ex? Now I picture her as one of those posters who always brings it back to bashing Kane. Lol

Are you kidding? Wouldn't you? I'd absolutely be all over this if it was about my ex husband. I'm super petty though

Not when my daughters could google it/read it about their father in only a few short years. But I don't think she's thought that far ahead.

She's not exactly trashing him, she's commenting on things he himself has already put out there. Cameras and whatnot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, for one, am happy she's defending herself. Kane is a dickbag. She needs an anonymous outlet to give it back to him

Yes, but at the same time she's crowned herself the queen of classy by blogging about how it's a mistake to badmouth the father of her kids/she's not going to do it anymore. So to do that then come on an anonymous forum and trash him kind of negates that, lol

That being said, she was defending herself on here (and very haughtily, I might add, lol), not bashing Kane. Unfortunately all that response did was confirm to me that her issues (accidents + her fall) are a result of her meds. I don't think she abuses them as in she takes too much, but she should not be taking them if she's not 100% sure of her safety (and more importantly the safety of the girls).

And she was mighty defensive about the insinuation that she was a pill popper. Where there's smoke, there's fire. I'm going to go ahead and assume that her pill usage and consequent car accidents/falls/etc. are all a HUGE issue of contention in their divorce. She appears to continue to add fuel to the fire with her actions. The sad thing is, compared to Kane being an unreasonable control freak, her being on such dangerous meds (for whatever reason) is a much more damaging prospect for their family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:this thread has really picked up this evening.

I know! Thanks Natasha!!! lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What tickles me about this is Natasha hasn't been a big topic of discussion overall on this thread (I'd say this one has been 80% Danni and her non-stop disasters). Does she read this just to get her jollies and see what mean things people are saying about her ex? Now I picture her as one of those posters who always brings it back to bashing Kane. Lol

Are you kidding? Wouldn't you? I'd absolutely be all over this if it was about my ex husband. I'm super petty though

Not when my daughters could google it/read it about their father in only a few short years. But I don't think she's thought that far ahead.

She's not exactly trashing him, she's commenting on things he himself has already put out there. Cameras and whatnot

Right, but my point is we have no idea what posts she wrote. She could've been one of the ones writing horrible things about Kane. We have no way of knowing. The beauty of being anonymous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, for one, am happy she's defending herself. Kane is a dickbag. She needs an anonymous outlet to give it back to him

Yes, but at the same time she's crowned herself the queen of classy by blogging about how it's a mistake to badmouth the father of her kids/she's not going to do it anymore. So to do that then come on an anonymous forum and trash him kind of negates that, lol

That being said, she was defending herself on here (and very haughtily, I might add, lol), not bashing Kane. Unfortunately all that response did was confirm to me that her issues (accidents + her fall) are a result of her meds. I don't think she abuses them as in she takes too much, but she should not be taking them if she's not 100% sure of her safety (and more importantly the safety of the girls).

And she was mighty defensive about the insinuation that she was a pill popper. Where there's smoke, there's fire. I'm going to go ahead and assume that her pill usage and consequent car accidents/falls/etc. are all a HUGE issue of contention in their divorce. She appears to continue to add fuel to the fire with her actions. The sad thing is, compared to Kane being an unreasonable control freak, her being on such dangerous meds (for whatever reason) is a much more damaging prospect for their family.

Agreed. She doth protest too much. I think Kane's a dick but I genuinely think he fears for his daughters' safety when they are with her. The fall/head injury makes so much sense now. I thought her blog post was just so odd... It had way too many little details and reminded me of how when someone is lying they always add kind of silly extraneous details to the narrative because they think it makes the story sound more believable. That is the vibe I got from that post. It reeked of "oh shit, he might try to take the girls away, let me painstakingly explain how my pills were NOT the reason for this disaster."

Oof. Sad situation for all. I hope she's at least stopped taking the pills if only for their daughters' sake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What tickles me about this is Natasha hasn't been a big topic of discussion overall on this thread (I'd say this one has been 80% Danni and her non-stop disasters). Does she read this just to get her jollies and see what mean things people are saying about her ex? Now I picture her as one of those posters who always brings it back to bashing Kane. Lol

Are you kidding? Wouldn't you? I'd absolutely be all over this if it was about my ex husband. I'm super petty though

Not when my daughters could google it/read it about their father in only a few short years. But I don't think she's thought that far ahead.

She's not exactly trashing him, she's commenting on things he himself has already put out there. Cameras and whatnot

Right, but my point is we have no idea what posts she wrote. She could've been one of the ones writing horrible things about Kane. We have no way of knowing. The beauty of being anonymous.

No one has written any inside info on Kane, that I can remember at least. Everyone speculates and makes assumptions based on what he says and does, so I'm not sure what you think she could have even said. Maybe she fanned the flames, but she's not putting things out here that could hurt his daughters in the long run.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, for one, am happy she's defending herself. Kane is a dickbag. She needs an anonymous outlet to give it back to him

Yes, but at the same time she's crowned herself the queen of classy by blogging about how it's a mistake to badmouth the father of her kids/she's not going to do it anymore. So to do that then come on an anonymous forum and trash him kind of negates that, lol

That being said, she was defending herself on here (and very haughtily, I might add, lol), not bashing Kane. Unfortunately all that response did was confirm to me that her issues (accidents + her fall) are a result of her meds. I don't think she abuses them as in she takes too much, but she should not be taking them if she's not 100% sure of her safety (and more importantly the safety of the girls).

And she was mighty defensive about the insinuation that she was a pill popper. Where there's smoke, there's fire. I'm going to go ahead and assume that her pill usage and consequent car accidents/falls/etc. are all a HUGE issue of contention in their divorce. She appears to continue to add fuel to the fire with her actions. The sad thing is, compared to Kane being an unreasonable control freak, her being on such dangerous meds (for whatever reason) is a much more damaging prospect for their family.

Agreed. She doth protest too much. I think Kane's a dick but I genuinely think he fears for his daughters' safety when they are with her. The fall/head injury makes so much sense now. I thought her blog post was just so odd... It had way too many little details and reminded me of how when someone is lying they always add kind of silly extraneous details to the narrative because they think it makes the story sound more believable. That is the vibe I got from that post. It reeked of "oh shit, he might try to take the girls away, let me painstakingly explain how my pills were NOT the reason for this disaster."

Oof. Sad situation for all. I hope she's at least stopped taking the pills if only for their daughters' sake.

Agree 100%. Like this part:

"During the week of school being canceled we had to get pretty creative on ways to keep the kids entertained. I had two huge boxes that hadn’t been broken down yet for recycling so I set them up in the living room with a bin of markers, stickers, pillows & blankets & let the girls go to town on creating their own little houses. Man, they loved those boxes, I think they’d still be living in them if I let them. Unfortunately for the box apartments I saw another use for them. I thought if I cut off the side flaps, you know, that would normally be used to close the boxes, I could maybe finagle them under the front two tires to hopefully give the van just enough traction to get out of the snow."

When I read it my reaction was Why the hell is she telling us the background of the friggin' cardboard boxes? Wouldn't it be easier to say "We had some empty cardboard boxes in the garage that I figured I could use to give the van traction."

Little things like that made it ring false for me, too. She was trying too hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What tickles me about this is Natasha hasn't been a big topic of discussion overall on this thread (I'd say this one has been 80% Danni and her non-stop disasters). Does she read this just to get her jollies and see what mean things people are saying about her ex? Now I picture her as one of those posters who always brings it back to bashing Kane. Lol

Are you kidding? Wouldn't you? I'd absolutely be all over this if it was about my ex husband. I'm super petty though

Not when my daughters could google it/read it about their father in only a few short years. But I don't think she's thought that far ahead.

She's not exactly trashing him, she's commenting on things he himself has already put out there. Cameras and whatnot

Right, but my point is we have no idea what posts she wrote. She could've been one of the ones writing horrible things about Kane. We have no way of knowing. The beauty of being anonymous.

No one has written any inside info on Kane, that I can remember at least. Everyone speculates and makes assumptions based on what he says and does, so I'm not sure what you think she could have even said. Maybe she fanned the flames, but she's not putting things out here that could hurt his daughters in the long run.

Oh yeah, I don't think she's divulged any insider info on him, she's not stupid (well, she slipped up when it came to defending herself, lol) but fanning the flames does encourage further hate that his daughters could eventually read, that was my point.

[Anonymous]

If I were Nat I'd be thumping my head against a desk right now. If she hadn't responded I don't even think her pills would've been a topic of conversation. Sigh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, for one, am happy she's defending herself. Kane is a dickbag. She needs an anonymous outlet to give it back to him

Yes, but at the same time she's crowned herself the queen of classy by blogging about how it's a mistake to badmouth the father of her kids/she's not going to do it anymore. So to do that then come on an anonymous forum and trash him kind of negates that, lol

That being said, she was defending herself on here (and very haughtily, I might add, lol), not bashing Kane. Unfortunately all that response did was confirm to me that her issues (accidents + her fall) are a result of her meds. I don't think she abuses them as in she takes too much, but she should not be taking them if she's not 100% sure of her safety (and more importantly the safety of the girls).

And she was mighty defensive about the insinuation that she was a pill popper. Where there's smoke, there's fire. I'm going to go ahead and assume that her pill usage and consequent car accidents/falls/etc. are all a HUGE issue of contention in their divorce. She appears to continue to add fuel to the fire with her actions. The sad thing is, compared to Kane being an unreasonable control freak, her being on such dangerous meds (for whatever reason) is a much more damaging prospect for their family.

Agreed. She doth protest too much. I think Kane's a dick but I genuinely think he fears for his daughters' safety when they are with her. The fall/head injury makes so much sense now. I thought her blog post was just so odd... It had way too many little details and reminded me of how when someone is lying they always add kind of silly extraneous details to the narrative because they think it makes the story sound more believable. That is the vibe I got from that post. It reeked of "oh shit, he might try to take the girls away, let me painstakingly explain how my pills were NOT the reason for this disaster."

Oof. Sad situation for all. I hope she's at least stopped taking the pills if only for their daughters' sake.

Agree 100%. Like this part:

"During the week of school being canceled we had to get pretty creative on ways to keep the kids entertained. I had two huge boxes that hadn’t been broken down yet for recycling so I set them up in the living room with a bin of markers, stickers, pillows & blankets & let the girls go to town on creating their own little houses. Man, they loved those boxes, I think they’d still be living in them if I let them. Unfortunately for the box apartments I saw another use for them. I thought if I cut off the side flaps, you know, that would normally be used to close the boxes, I could maybe finagle them under the front two tires to hopefully give the van just enough traction to get out of the snow."

When I read it my reaction was Why the hell is she telling us the background of the friggin' cardboard boxes? Wouldn't it be easier to say "We had some empty cardboard boxes in the garage that I figured I could use to give the van traction."

Little things like that made it ring false for me, too. She was trying too hard.

yes!! I hadn't thought of it that way before but you're right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What tickles me about this is Natasha hasn't been a big topic of discussion overall on this thread (I'd say this one has been 80% Danni and her non-stop disasters). Does she read this just to get her jollies and see what mean things people are saying about her ex? Now I picture her as one of those posters who always brings it back to bashing Kane. Lol

Are you kidding? Wouldn't you? I'd absolutely be all over this if it was about my ex husband. I'm super petty though

Not when my daughters could google it/read it about their father in only a few short years. But I don't think she's thought that far ahead.

She's not exactly trashing him, she's commenting on things he himself has already put out there. Cameras and whatnot

Right, but my point is we have no idea what posts she wrote. She could've been one of the ones writing horrible things about Kane. We have no way of knowing. The beauty of being anonymous.

No one has written any inside info on Kane, that I can remember at least. Everyone speculates and makes assumptions based on what he says and does, so I'm not sure what you think she could have even said. Maybe she fanned the flames, but she's not putting things out here that could hurt his daughters in the long run.

Oh yeah, I don't think she's divulged any insider info on him, she's not stupid (well, she slipped up when it came to defending herself, lol) but fanning the flames does encourage further hate that his daughters could eventually read, that was my point.

Oh gotcha. Maybe he should be a nicer person that he would want his daughters to read about one day

[Anonymous]

danni's "friend" re-tweeted a very classy statement:
https://twitter.com/Really_TH/status/717101731570655232