The Kane Show (Part 4)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IMO the divorce between Kane/Natasha has no one who is right or wrong. I 100% buy that Kane is a vindictive control freak. I also 100% buy that Natasha was hoarding household money for a long time and that she has (or had) some sort of substance abuse problem, most likely abused prescription meds that she was too oblivious to realize she was abusing. Or she is the world's worst driver.

WOW. Who the hell are you? Seriously, those are some MAJOR accusations you're making about two people which I feel quite certain you have never met. Were you there when they were in marriage counseling? The secretary perhaps listening in with a cup on the wall?

Natasha is a real person. She is also a person who has found herself in what will probably be one of the hardest periods of her life. And she is having to go through it all, by his choice, publicly. She has been diagnosed by many doctors and even spent a week at the Mayo Clinic with a diagnosis of a serious autoimmune disease: Sjogrens Syndrome, look it up if you're not to busy kicking a stranger when theyre down, it causes arthritis, liver damage, fevers, want more? How about Fibromyalgia? (which I can personally say is a brutal disease to have, it causes pain, every day, every fucking day, and fatigue, headaches & nerve damamge... As if that were enough she said she was recently also diagnosed with a small fiber neuropathy while she was at Mayo. Let me tell you what that is since you seem to be so filled judgement & hate that its hard for you to focus on also educating yourself. It's when the nerve endings in your hands & feet burn like your nails have been pulled off & even a cool breeze feels like its holding a lighter up to your missing nail toe.

She's been remarkably honest about what medications she takes (not that she should have to answer to us) , Lyrica, Plaquinil, Elavil, she has said that she made the decision to find a pain management doctor to help her find alternative treatments that are non-opiod. Who the fuck are you to make such a judgement that she's a pill popping addict? This woman is a mother to two little girls that she loves fiercely. What a horrible thing to not just imply but say straight out that their mom is an addict?!

Please, I'm dying to know what goes on in that brain of yours that you feel its ok to make such accusatory judgements about someone YOU HAVE NEVER MET. But someone you know is a real person, a mother, a daughter...& you think its ok to publicly label her as an addict. Wow.

I want to know how you sleep at night, how does the hate not keep you awake, knowing that you should be ashamed of yourself.

This is totally Natasha!!! Ever notice she never types the word "and"...she only uses the "&" (check her blog posts)

You just outed yourself, girl!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My thing is, if he worried about his girls safety after she hurt her head, why would he leave the girls in her care?

He probably couldn't just take the girls without being able to prove the fall was a result of her pill usage. I'm guessing he's been working on that behind the scenes since the accident.

^This. I don't think there was anything he could do, which is sad. I don't think Natasha would've been receptive to him staying considering how hostile their relationship is/was, and he can't just take the girls away without involving the courts.

If there was a genuine safety concern, his lawyers would have filed an emergency injunction to remove the girls from the home. Not even Kane is lazy/dumb enough to not act quickly on that.

Agreed. Any why are you all so quick to assume she had or has a problem? What about him? I feel for her, it's going to take a lifetime to recover from someone having such complete control of her life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My thing is, if he worried about his girls safety after she hurt her head, why would he leave the girls in her care?

He probably couldn't just take the girls without being able to prove the fall was a result of her pill usage. I'm guessing he's been working on that behind the scenes since the accident.

^This. I don't think there was anything he could do, which is sad. I don't think Natasha would've been receptive to him staying considering how hostile their relationship is/was, and he can't just take the girls away without involving the courts.

If there was a genuine safety concern, his lawyers would have filed an emergency injunction to remove the girls from the home. Not even Kane is lazy/dumb enough to not act quickly on that.

Agreed. Any why are you all so quick to assume she had or has a problem? What about him? I feel for her, it's going to take a lifetime to recover from someone having such complete control of her life.

Oh please, she was with him on and off for years before they even got married. She knew exactly who she was marrying, and so did he. She was more than willing to trade a certain amount of control in return for not having to work and a cushy life. Yes things fell apart (on both sides) but both of them got exactly what they signed up for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My thing is, if he worried about his girls safety after she hurt her head, why would he leave the girls in her care?

He probably couldn't just take the girls without being able to prove the fall was a result of her pill usage. I'm guessing he's been working on that behind the scenes since the accident.

^This. I don't think there was anything he could do, which is sad. I don't think Natasha would've been receptive to him staying considering how hostile their relationship is/was, and he can't just take the girls away without involving the courts.

If there was a genuine safety concern, his lawyers would have filed an emergency injunction to remove the girls from the home. Not even Kane is lazy/dumb enough to not act quickly on that.

Agreed. Any why are you all so quick to assume she had or has a problem? What about him? I feel for her, it's going to take a lifetime to recover from someone having such complete control of her life.

Because she pretty much just told us she has a problem by mistake? Lol. The drugs she's taking have dangerous side effects that explain her accidents. Kane has problems up the wazoo as well but at least he's not a risk to his kid's safety... He's just a straight up a-hole.

[Anonymous]

I know you're always on that night shift
But I can't stand these nights alone
And I don't need no explanation
Cause baby you're the boss at home

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know you're always on that night shift
But I can't stand these nights alone
And I don't need no explanation
Cause baby you're the boss at home

Are you the same PP from like thread #2 who posted Demi Lovato lyrics?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know you're always on that night shift
But I can't stand these nights alone
And I don't need no explanation
Cause baby you're the boss at home

Random song lyrics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My thing is, if he worried about his girls safety after she hurt her head, why would he leave the girls in her care?

He probably couldn't just take the girls without being able to prove the fall was a result of her pill usage. I'm guessing he's been working on that behind the scenes since the accident.

^This. I don't think there was anything he could do, which is sad. I don't think Natasha would've been receptive to him staying considering how hostile their relationship is/was, and he can't just take the girls away without involving the courts.

If there was a genuine safety concern, his lawyers would have filed an emergency injunction to remove the girls from the home. Not even Kane is lazy/dumb enough to not act quickly on that.

Agreed. Any why are you all so quick to assume she had or has a problem? What about him? I feel for her, it's going to take a lifetime to recover from someone having such complete control of her life.

Because she pretty much just told us she has a problem by mistake? Lol. The drugs she's taking have dangerous side effects that explain her accidents. Kane has problems up the wazoo as well but at least he's not a risk to his kid's safety... He's just a straight up a-hole.

Do we have a list of the drugs he's on? I'd be happy to list the side effects of them if so.

[Anonymous]

From the Side Effects tab for Lyrica on webmd:

"Remember that your doctor has prescribed this medication because he or she has judged that the benefit to you is greater than the risk of side effects."

[Anonymous]

Danni Starr
32 mins ·
I'm looking for my next adventure but I'm not in a rush! I'm writing and filming with TLC but most importantly I'm having a blast with Munchie and Smooch. They are loving how much fun we are having. I'm not constantly exhausted now so we are playing and spending so much quality time. Munchie's on a hunger strike but besides that all is well. Slim and I have been working through our co parenting schedule and things are going smoothly. I just wanted to say that I'm overwhelmed by the amount of emails, messages and comments from those of you who call me your best friend in your head. You have no idea what a compliment that is! Those emails, messages and comments have made this transition less painful. Thank you for considering me a friend! I'm humbled and so thankful for you.

[Anonymous]

The treatment for OCD is usually cognitive behavioral therapy and an antidepressant such as an a SSRI or a TCA (same class as amitriptyline Natasha has been said to be taking). If he is on something stronger or with any abuse potential it is probably for treatment of another disease state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IMO the divorce between Kane/Natasha has no one who is right or wrong. I 100% buy that Kane is a vindictive control freak. I also 100% buy that Natasha was hoarding household money for a long time and that she has (or had) some sort of substance abuse problem, most likely abused prescription meds that she was too oblivious to realize she was abusing. Or she is the world's worst driver.

WOW. Who the hell are you? Seriously, those are some MAJOR accusations you're making about two people which I feel quite certain you have never met. Were you there when they were in marriage counseling? The secretary perhaps listening in with a cup on the wall?

Natasha is a real person. She is also a person who has found herself in what will probably be one of the hardest periods of her life. And she is having to go through it all, by his choice, publicly. She has been diagnosed by many doctors and even spent a week at the Mayo Clinic with a diagnosis of a serious autoimmune disease: Sjogrens Syndrome, look it up if you're not to busy kicking a stranger when theyre down, it causes arthritis, liver damage, fevers, want more? How about Fibromyalgia? (which I can personally say is a brutal disease to have, it causes pain, every day, every fucking day, and fatigue, headaches & nerve damamge... As if that were enough she said she was recently also diagnosed with a small fiber neuropathy while she was at Mayo. Let me tell you what that is since you seem to be so filled judgement & hate that its hard for you to focus on also educating yourself. It's when the nerve endings in your hands & feet burn like your nails have been pulled off & even a cool breeze feels like its holding a lighter up to your missing nail toe.

She's been remarkably honest about what medications she takes (not that she should have to answer to us) , Lyrica, Plaquinil, Elavil, she has said that she made the decision to find a pain management doctor to help her find alternative treatments that are non-opiod. Who the fuck are you to make such a judgement that she's a pill popping addict? This woman is a mother to two little girls that she loves fiercely. What a horrible thing to not just imply but say straight out that their mom is an addict?!

Please, I'm dying to know what goes on in that brain of yours that you feel its ok to make such accusatory judgements about someone YOU HAVE NEVER MET. But someone you know is a real person, a mother, a daughter...& you think its ok to publicly label her as an addict. Wow.

I want to know how you sleep at night, how does the hate not keep you awake, knowing that you should be ashamed of yourself.

This is totally Natasha!!! Ever notice she never types the word "and"...she only uses the "&" (check her blog posts)

You just outed yourself, girl!

+1 lol

[Anonymous]

I don't really have anything negative to say about Natasha, but as someone who has followed her blog regularly for years I don't remember several of those details ever being mentioned. So......how do you know about this PP?

[Anonymous]

Considering Sarah said that Kane recorded her without her knowledge and kept that recording for either six or nine months, I believe Kane would spy on Nat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My thing is, if he worried about his girls safety after she hurt her head, why would he leave the girls in her care?

He probably couldn't just take the girls without being able to prove the fall was a result of her pill usage. I'm guessing he's been working on that behind the scenes since the accident.

^This. I don't think there was anything he could do, which is sad. I don't think Natasha would've been receptive to him staying considering how hostile their relationship is/was, and he can't just take the girls away without involving the courts.

If there was a genuine safety concern, his lawyers would have filed an emergency injunction to remove the girls from the home. Not even Kane is lazy/dumb enough to not act quickly on that.

Agreed. Any why are you all so quick to assume she had or has a problem? What about him? I feel for her, it's going to take a lifetime to recover from someone having such complete control of her life.

Oh please, she was with him on and off for years before they even got married. She knew exactly who she was marrying, and so did he. She was more than willing to trade a certain amount of control in return for not having to work and a cushy life. Yes things fell apart (on both sides) but both of them got exactly what they signed up for.

People change. I know my husband is not the same immature guy I married 8 years ago, and not the over dramatic girl he married. She may have known who he was at that point in his life but to be fair, we al change. And what's with this "control" thing. In a marriage no one should control the other person, sorry but that's not what marriage is all about