Help me understand Republican women in their 30s and 40s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

Enough already. I will give you that there are 2, maybe 3 folks that will vote on this issue but that is it. Discuss something else for a change.

I disagree strongly. Plenty of people, men and women don’t want men playing women’s sports or changing in women’s locker rooms.

There are certainly people who agree with you, and they're vocal. But people who disagree make their voices heard when it counts. Pat McCrory, Republican governor of North Carolina, signed a bill in 2016 that required people to use the bathroom matching their birth certificate at public facilities. He lost to a Democrat even though he shared a ballot with Trump, who won the state.

That is a stupid bill. Forget about the 7 transgender individuals it addresses. Hundreds, maybe thousands of women use the men's room all the time when the women's room line gets way too long.

[Anonymous]

Cite the specific Title IX language that guarantees males can do things like strut around buck naked with erect penises in shared womens changing rooms.

I'm still waiting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

Enough already. I will give you that there are 2, maybe 3 folks that will vote on this issue but that is it. Discuss something else for a change.

I disagree strongly. Plenty of people, men and women don’t want men playing women’s sports or changing in women’s locker rooms.

There are certainly people who agree with you, and they're vocal. But people who disagree make their voices heard when it counts. Pat McCrory, Republican governor of North Carolina, signed a bill in 2016 that required people to use the bathroom matching their birth certificate at public facilities. He lost to a Democrat even though he shared a ballot with Trump, who won the state.

That is a stupid bill. Forget about the 7 transgender individuals it addresses. Hundreds, maybe thousands of women use the men's room all the time when the women's room line gets way too long.

And even when women's room lines aren't long, biological females are starting to be thrown out of them by obnoxious self-appointed bathroom-police Karens for any number of dumb reasons, like their hair is short or they wear jeans or have a blocky build or whatever else. How nice of you to stick up for your fellow females by not letting other biological women pee in peace just because they don't meet your own deranged and arbitrary standard of appearance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

Enough already. I will give you that there are 2, maybe 3 folks that will vote on this issue but that is it. Discuss something else for a change.

I disagree strongly. Plenty of people, men and women don’t want men playing women’s sports or changing in women’s locker rooms.

There are certainly people who agree with you, and they're vocal. But people who disagree make their voices heard when it counts. Pat McCrory, Republican governor of North Carolina, signed a bill in 2016 that required people to use the bathroom matching their birth certificate at public facilities. He lost to a Democrat even though he shared a ballot with Trump, who won the state.

That is a stupid bill. Forget about the 7 transgender individuals it addresses. Hundreds, maybe thousands of women use the men's room all the time when the women's room line gets way too long.

And even when women's room lines aren't long, biological females are starting to be thrown out of them by obnoxious self-appointed bathroom-police Karens for any number of dumb reasons, like their hair is short or they wear jeans or have a blocky build or whatever else. How nice of you to stick up for your fellow females by not letting other biological women pee in peace just because they don't meet your own deranged and arbitrary standard of appearance.

What are you ranting about? If you want to stand in a long slow line for the women's room suit yourself. Try just walking into the men's room, taking care of business and going on your way. No one really cares.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

That's actually false. The revisions to Title IX don't mention transwomen anywhere.

I'd challenge you to cite the specific language where it does.

NY Times:
Republican attorneys general challenging the law have argued, and Judge Doughty agreed, that the rule could violate the privacy and safety of female students by allowing “biological men who identify as a female” into facilities such as bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their gender identity.

The rule broadly holds that instances where schools deny students that access, or where staff members do not observe transgender students’ preferred pronouns or chosen gender identity, could create a hostile environment that the Education Department could investigate.

Fail. Try again. Cite the specific language. Not what some deranged Republican AG or what some activist Trump-appointed judge said.

Cite the specific Title IX language.

Not the language but a summery from DOE. Page 3 halfway down. Sexual identity is the new protected group. So now boys can’t be told to play boy sports or use boys bathrooms if they identify as girls. It’s not a fake out. It’s a real expansion of the law. And to say it is clarifying the statute from 1972 is absurd. And that’s why it will ultimately get struck down. Title XII was intended to protect and ensure opportunities for both sexes were equal. And as a result numerous sports were added for women and many schools went coed. And so, now the Buden admin is saying sex really meant sexual identity. And so the very law created to protect women’s rights is being used to push women out. It is insane that the party of women’s rights is so backward on this.

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-final-rule-factsheet.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

That's actually false. The revisions to Title IX don't mention transwomen anywhere.

I'd challenge you to cite the specific language where it does.

NY Times:
Republican attorneys general challenging the law have argued, and Judge Doughty agreed, that the rule could violate the privacy and safety of female students by allowing “biological men who identify as a female” into facilities such as bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their gender identity.

The rule broadly holds that instances where schools deny students that access, or where staff members do not observe transgender students’ preferred pronouns or chosen gender identity, could create a hostile environment that the Education Department could investigate.

Fail. Try again. Cite the specific language. Not what some deranged Republican AG or what some activist Trump-appointed judge said.

Cite the specific Title IX language.

It was understood from day one that school bathroom bans were being blocked Biden’s order

https://apnews.com/article/title-ix-transgender-bathroom-bans-645b5564ce227a9efe2c05f883609ae8#

Read the order in full. It’s online including the section in hostile environment around page 202. The judge isn’t being an activist, he is acknowledging that the executive can’t rewrite gender identity into a bill that says sex. They are two different things and a rewrite requires congress.

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-unofficial-final-rule-2024.pdf

[Anonymous]

Pp here. Meant to say title nine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

That's actually false. The revisions to Title IX don't mention transwomen anywhere.

I'd challenge you to cite the specific language where it does.

NY Times:
Republican attorneys general challenging the law have argued, and Judge Doughty agreed, that the rule could violate the privacy and safety of female students by allowing “biological men who identify as a female” into facilities such as bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their gender identity.

The rule broadly holds that instances where schools deny students that access, or where staff members do not observe transgender students’ preferred pronouns or chosen gender identity, could create a hostile environment that the Education Department could investigate.

Fail. Try again. Cite the specific language. Not what some deranged Republican AG or what some activist Trump-appointed judge said.

Cite the specific Title IX language.

It was understood from day one that school bathroom bans were being blocked Biden’s order

https://apnews.com/article/title-ix-transgender-bathroom-bans-645b5564ce227a9efe2c05f883609ae8#

Read the order in full. It’s online including the section in hostile environment around page 202. The judge isn’t being an activist, he is acknowledging that the executive can’t rewrite gender identity into a bill that says sex. They are two different things and a rewrite requires congress.

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-unofficial-final-rule-2024.pdf

It DOES NOT specifically say that. That's only the selective interpretation that activists came up with on their own.

Cite the specific language actually in Biden's Title IX revisions that guarantees males can do things like strut around buck naked with erect penises in shared womens changing rooms.

I'm still waiting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

Enough already. I will give you that there are 2, maybe 3 folks that will vote on this issue but that is it. Discuss something else for a change.

I disagree strongly. Plenty of people, men and women don’t want men playing women’s sports or changing in women’s locker rooms.

There are certainly people who agree with you, and they're vocal. But people who disagree make their voices heard when it counts. Pat McCrory, Republican governor of North Carolina, signed a bill in 2016 that required people to use the bathroom matching their birth certificate at public facilities. He lost to a Democrat even though he shared a ballot with Trump, who won the state.

That is a stupid bill. Forget about the 7 transgender individuals it addresses. Hundreds, maybe thousands of women use the men's room all the time when the women's room line gets way too long.

And even when women's room lines aren't long, biological females are starting to be thrown out of them by obnoxious self-appointed bathroom-police Karens for any number of dumb reasons, like their hair is short or they wear jeans or have a blocky build or whatever else. How nice of you to stick up for your fellow females by not letting other biological women pee in peace just because they don't meet your own deranged and arbitrary standard of appearance.

What are you ranting about? If you want to stand in a long slow line for the women's room suit yourself. Try just walking into the men's room, taking care of business and going on your way. No one really cares.

Wasn't a "rant" unless you're out of touch with reality and somehow reality is now coming to you as a shock. It was about the very real increase in biological women being harassed and thrown out for using the women's bathrooms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

That's actually false. The revisions to Title IX don't mention transwomen anywhere.

I'd challenge you to cite the specific language where it does.

NY Times:
Republican attorneys general challenging the law have argued, and Judge Doughty agreed, that the rule could violate the privacy and safety of female students by allowing “biological men who identify as a female” into facilities such as bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their gender identity.

The rule broadly holds that instances where schools deny students that access, or where staff members do not observe transgender students’ preferred pronouns or chosen gender identity, could create a hostile environment that the Education Department could investigate.

Fail. Try again. Cite the specific language. Not what some deranged Republican AG or what some activist Trump-appointed judge said.

Cite the specific Title IX language.

It was understood from day one that school bathroom bans were being blocked Biden’s order

https://apnews.com/article/title-ix-transgender-bathroom-bans-645b5564ce227a9efe2c05f883609ae8#

Read the order in full. It’s online including the section in hostile environment around page 202. The judge isn’t being an activist, he is acknowledging that the executive can’t rewrite gender identity into a bill that says sex. They are two different things and a rewrite requires congress.

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-unofficial-final-rule-2024.pdf

It DOES NOT specifically say that. That's only the selective interpretation that activists came up with on their own.

Cite the specific language actually in Biden's Title IX revisions that guarantees males can do things like strut around buck naked with erect penises in shared womens changing rooms.

I'm still waiting.

Biden’s own advisor said it in court! You are really reaching here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

That's actually false. The revisions to Title IX don't mention transwomen anywhere.

I'd challenge you to cite the specific language where it does.

NY Times:
Republican attorneys general challenging the law have argued, and Judge Doughty agreed, that the rule could violate the privacy and safety of female students by allowing “biological men who identify as a female” into facilities such as bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their gender identity.

The rule broadly holds that instances where schools deny students that access, or where staff members do not observe transgender students’ preferred pronouns or chosen gender identity, could create a hostile environment that the Education Department could investigate.

Fail. Try again. Cite the specific language. Not what some deranged Republican AG or what some activist Trump-appointed judge said.

Cite the specific Title IX language.

It was understood from day one that school bathroom bans were being blocked Biden’s order

https://apnews.com/article/title-ix-transgender-bathroom-bans-645b5564ce227a9efe2c05f883609ae8#

Read the order in full. It’s online including the section in hostile environment around page 202. The judge isn’t being an activist, he is acknowledging that the executive can’t rewrite gender identity into a bill that says sex. They are two different things and a rewrite requires congress.

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-unofficial-final-rule-2024.pdf

It DOES NOT specifically say that. That's only the selective interpretation that activists came up with on their own.

Cite the specific language actually in Biden's Title IX revisions that guarantees males can do things like strut around buck naked with erect penises in shared womens changing rooms.

I'm still waiting.

Biden’s own advisor said it in court! You are really reaching here.

Bullshit.
You're the one who still can't manage to cite the specific language.

Cite the language. I'm STILL waiting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

That's actually false. The revisions to Title IX don't mention transwomen anywhere.

I'd challenge you to cite the specific language where it does.

NY Times:
Republican attorneys general challenging the law have argued, and Judge Doughty agreed, that the rule could violate the privacy and safety of female students by allowing “biological men who identify as a female” into facilities such as bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their gender identity.

The rule broadly holds that instances where schools deny students that access, or where staff members do not observe transgender students’ preferred pronouns or chosen gender identity, could create a hostile environment that the Education Department could investigate.

Fail. Try again. Cite the specific language. Not what some deranged Republican AG or what some activist Trump-appointed judge said.

Cite the specific Title IX language.

It was understood from day one that school bathroom bans were being blocked Biden’s order

https://apnews.com/article/title-ix-transgender-bathroom-bans-645b5564ce227a9efe2c05f883609ae8#

Read the order in full. It’s online including the section in hostile environment around page 202. The judge isn’t being an activist, he is acknowledging that the executive can’t rewrite gender identity into a bill that says sex. They are two different things and a rewrite requires congress.

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-unofficial-final-rule-2024.pdf

The pp replying to you about the word “transwomen” in the changes is doing so in the worst faith ever! S/he understands what this will mean for girls but cares more about boy’s feelings than girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

That's actually false. The revisions to Title IX don't mention transwomen anywhere.

I'd challenge you to cite the specific language where it does.

NY Times:
Republican attorneys general challenging the law have argued, and Judge Doughty agreed, that the rule could violate the privacy and safety of female students by allowing “biological men who identify as a female” into facilities such as bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their gender identity.

The rule broadly holds that instances where schools deny students that access, or where staff members do not observe transgender students’ preferred pronouns or chosen gender identity, could create a hostile environment that the Education Department could investigate.

Fail. Try again. Cite the specific language. Not what some deranged Republican AG or what some activist Trump-appointed judge said.

Cite the specific Title IX language.

It was understood from day one that school bathroom bans were being blocked Biden’s order

https://apnews.com/article/title-ix-transgender-bathroom-bans-645b5564ce227a9efe2c05f883609ae8#

Read the order in full. It’s online including the section in hostile environment around page 202. The judge isn’t being an activist, he is acknowledging that the executive can’t rewrite gender identity into a bill that says sex. They are two different things and a rewrite requires congress.

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-unofficial-final-rule-2024.pdf

It DOES NOT specifically say that. That's only the selective interpretation that activists came up with on their own.

Cite the specific language actually in Biden's Title IX revisions that guarantees males can do things like strut around buck naked with erect penises in shared womens changing rooms.

I'm still waiting.

Biden’s own advisor said it in court! You are really reaching here.

Bullshit.
You're the one who still can't manage to cite the specific language.

Cite the language. I'm STILL waiting.

READ THE ORDER. He is changing sex to gender identity and all that is associated with that so a student can now pursue a hostile environment claim he couldn’t previously if not allowed to use the bathroom of his gender identity. No one here is confused except you. Not Biden’s advisors, not the media, not the judge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

That's actually false. The revisions to Title IX don't mention transwomen anywhere.

I'd challenge you to cite the specific language where it does.

NY Times:
Republican attorneys general challenging the law have argued, and Judge Doughty agreed, that the rule could violate the privacy and safety of female students by allowing “biological men who identify as a female” into facilities such as bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their gender identity.

The rule broadly holds that instances where schools deny students that access, or where staff members do not observe transgender students’ preferred pronouns or chosen gender identity, could create a hostile environment that the Education Department could investigate.

Fail. Try again. Cite the specific language. Not what some deranged Republican AG or what some activist Trump-appointed judge said.

Cite the specific Title IX language.

It was understood from day one that school bathroom bans were being blocked Biden’s order

https://apnews.com/article/title-ix-transgender-bathroom-bans-645b5564ce227a9efe2c05f883609ae8#

Read the order in full. It’s online including the section in hostile environment around page 202. The judge isn’t being an activist, he is acknowledging that the executive can’t rewrite gender identity into a bill that says sex. They are two different things and a rewrite requires congress.

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-unofficial-final-rule-2024.pdf

The pp replying to you about the word “transwomen” in the changes is doing so in the worst faith ever! S/he understands what this will mean for girls but cares more about boy’s feelings than girls.

It’s too cute by half and no one is falling for it. You don’t get to redefine the law without a judge recognizing the downstream consequences of that change and preemptively blocking the bill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

That's actually false. The revisions to Title IX don't mention transwomen anywhere.

I'd challenge you to cite the specific language where it does.

NY Times:
Republican attorneys general challenging the law have argued, and Judge Doughty agreed, that the rule could violate the privacy and safety of female students by allowing “biological men who identify as a female” into facilities such as bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to their gender identity.

The rule broadly holds that instances where schools deny students that access, or where staff members do not observe transgender students’ preferred pronouns or chosen gender identity, could create a hostile environment that the Education Department could investigate.

Fail. Try again. Cite the specific language. Not what some deranged Republican AG or what some activist Trump-appointed judge said.

Cite the specific Title IX language.

It was understood from day one that school bathroom bans were being blocked Biden’s order

https://apnews.com/article/title-ix-transgender-bathroom-bans-645b5564ce227a9efe2c05f883609ae8#

Read the order in full. It’s online including the section in hostile environment around page 202. The judge isn’t being an activist, he is acknowledging that the executive can’t rewrite gender identity into a bill that says sex. They are two different things and a rewrite requires congress.

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-unofficial-final-rule-2024.pdf

It DOES NOT specifically say that. That's only the selective interpretation that activists came up with on their own.

Cite the specific language actually in Biden's Title IX revisions that guarantees males can do things like strut around buck naked with erect penises in shared womens changing rooms.

I'm still waiting.

Biden’s own advisor said it in court! You are really reaching here.

Bullshit.
You're the one who still can't manage to cite the specific language.

Cite the language. I'm STILL waiting.

READ THE ORDER. He is changing sex to gender identity and all that is associated with that so a student can now pursue a hostile environment claim he couldn’t previously if not allowed to use the bathroom of his gender identity. No one here is confused except you. Not Biden’s advisors, not the media, not the judge.

So in other words you still got nothing. Just some handwaving and blathering. Got it. I'm not confused one bit - you're the one who clearly cannot come through with any specific language. Instead you're peddling a partisan Trump-appointed judge's contorted interpretation of it rather than being able to cite the language itself. How revealing of your dishonesty.