Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

CNN's Tapper: As of now, there is "no contemporaneous, corroborating evidence for any of the charges" against Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why isn't ANYONE reporting the alleged "gang rapes" to the Montgomery County Police Department?

They apparently want to investigate, but can't until SOMEONE makes a report.

Are you going to ask this on every single page of every thread? The victims have requested an FBI investigation which is the same agency that investigated the Anita Hill case and John Tower cases.

Since when FBI were given an authority to investigate sexual crimes? It is jurisdiction of the local police and should be referred to them.

At least since Anita Hill.

Chairman Grassley’s explanation of the difference in these two situations.....

LOL they are saying they won't refer to the FBI because Anita Hill's allegations were private and Ford's are public. A distinction without a difference. This reasoning is complete and UTTER BS.

Probably drafted by the incomparably incompetent Mike Davis, “unfazed and determined.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For Kavanaugh:

Tremble, thou wretch,
That hast within thee undivulged crimes
Unwhipped of justice.

-King Lear

For our sons and daughters:
“Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none.” ...
William Shakespeare, All's Well That Ends Well

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone be interested in watching the hearing this morning should read Christine Blasey Ford’s opening statement.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4945864/Ford-Testimony-2018-09-26.pdf

So after a few days of people picking the story apart, now she says, it was 4 boys, oh and I remember a girl, oh and I remember....

Please

This is not the case - her story is unchanged. She listed someone else at the ‘gathering ’ But didn’t say that they either assaulted her or witnessed it. What are you talking about? Can you not read?

Her letter to Feinstein said “me and 4 others.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are her own chosen four witnesses refusing to support her?

Because she didn’t choose them. She didn’t choose who was there. The truth can be messy.

The liberal logic is cuckoo here.

If I accused someone of robbing my store and gave the names of the four people there at the time who could attest to it, and they say they never saw any robbery take place, is the response "well, I didn't get to choose who was in my store at the time." JFC.

This isn’t a ‘liberal’ versus ‘conservative’ issue. I’ve socialized with a conservative Supreme Court Justice and while I would not describe myself as conservative I would describe this man as a national treasure and I have the utmost respect for him. This is a ‘is someone fit for the highest court’ issue.

[Anonymous]

So odd how Ford scrubbed all her online Progressive activist persona, but she left only one photo in big black sunglasses. Hopefully she will finally expose her face now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are her own chosen four witnesses refusing to support her?

Because she didn’t choose them. She didn’t choose who was there. The truth can be messy.

Why would you want to testify? As soon as you say you will there will be reporters at your home and work, your friends will be interviewed, your children followed, death threats, etc.

[Anonymous]

The Wolves are at the door.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why isn't ANYONE reporting the alleged "gang rapes" to the Montgomery County Police Department?

They apparently want to investigate, but can't until SOMEONE makes a report.

Are you going to ask this on every single page of every thread? The victims have requested an FBI investigation which is the same agency that investigated the Anita Hill case and John Tower cases.

Since when FBI were given an authority to investigate sexual crimes? It is jurisdiction of the local police and should be referred to them.

At least since Anita Hill.

Chairman Grassley’s explanation of the difference in these two situations.....

LOL they are saying they won't refer to the FBI because Anita Hill's allegations were private and Ford's are public. A distinction without a difference. This reasoning is complete and UTTER BS.

It's important because once these allegations were out in the open, a confidential background check was no longer in the realm of possibility. The allegations are likely to influence what is said by the people they question.

This is complete and utter nonsense, leaving the lawyering to competent attorneys.

[Anonymous]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPyRKSFuMes

Live Coverage links for people who would like to see this directly.

[Anonymous]

What?!? She looks nothing like that one photo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, Christine Ford's alleged witnesses refuse to testify under oath in her defense.

Um, imagine that. Not everyone wants to be a liar.

Women NEVER lie. Once you accept this you will be able to understand what will happen today

It’s hard to tell if you are being sarcastic or honestly believe this.

Neither. I think it's one of the best troll attempts in the history of DCUM, lolz!

[Anonymous]

they have matching double chins

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So odd how Ford scrubbed all her online Progressive activist persona, but she left only one photo in big black sunglasses. Hopefully she will finally expose her face now.

Is it odd? I'm not sure why you think so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone be interested in watching the hearing this morning should read Christine Blasey Ford’s opening statement.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4945864/Ford-Testimony-2018-09-26.pdf

So after a few days of people picking the story apart, now she says, it was 4 boys, oh and I remember a girl, oh and I remember....

Please

This is not the case - her story is unchanged. She listed someone else at the ‘gathering ’ But didn’t say that they either assaulted her or witnessed it. What are you talking about? Can you not read?

Her letter to Feinstein said “me and 4 others.”

"Me and four others"? Is that how an educated woman with a fancy-schmancy education speaks?