
Because she didn’t choose them. She didn’t choose who was there. The truth can be messy. |
I went to a high school rampant with drug use - the worst in the County. Yet, I never so much as smoked a joint. If someone comes forward and claims they saw me smoking pot at a party, is part of the "evidence" that I went to a druggie school and other kids did a lot of it? |
You are a most observant and perceptive reader! ![]() |
+1 |
For Kavanaugh:
Tremble, thou wretch, That hast within thee undivulged crimes Unwhipped of justice. -King Lear |
No republican would believe them. See: Brett Kavanaugh threads. |
How nice. |
None of them chose this. MJ and BK brought this on themselves if she is to be believed and they could fix it. |
So am I, but not optimistic about the hearing. The Republicans have hired a prosecutor to ask questions and advancing a new version of the doppelgänger theory with the two new man that apparently have come forward. |
The liberal logic is cuckoo here. If I accused someone of robbing my store and gave the names of the four people there at the time who could attest to it, and they say they never saw any robbery take place, is the response "well, I didn't get to choose who was in my store at the time." JFC. |
He doth protest too much. |
Maybe those two men are cool fusing another girl with Fod. What a load of crap. Which alum are they and how much were they paid? |
This is not the case - her story is unchanged. She listed someone else at the ‘gathering ’ But didn’t say that they either assaulted her or witnessed it. What are you talking about? Can you not read? |
No, she actually did claim that these individuals were witnesses. |
^^The voice of the committee and Kavanaugh supporters, loud and clear! |