Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

What evidence does Kavanaugh have that these allegations are being coordinated? He sounds unhinged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

If it’s credible, I’d push for it.

key word

Ford’s accusations fit that definition.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What evidence does Kavanaugh have that these allegations are being coordinated? He sounds unhinged.

Don’t forget conservatives are Projectors — what actually DOES appear coordinated are the attempts to smear another man that went to school with Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

If it’s credible, I’d push for it.

key word

Ford’s accusations fit that definition.

Sure. If you consider credible a claim from 36 years ago in which the accuser cannot remember the date, the house, or how she got to and from the unknown house and the 4 people she named who were supposedly present have no recollection of such a party. Yeah, sure, it’s credible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that our country makes SEXUAL ASSAULT claims political is sickening. Since when is it Left or Right to be against sexual assault?

These claims are past the SOL but that does not mean they shouldn't be taken seriously for a job on SCOTUS.
But, that being said, I do fear we are paddling up a creek we will not be able to go back down. First with no hearing for Garland (bad GOP optics) and now this (people see this as the Dems being desperate), i fear we will NEVER get a full court either due to elections coming up or something from high school coming out.

Gorsuch was CONFIRMED and easily. Or do we just like the "both sides obstruct" story line?

[Anonymous]

Who here saves their calendars?

[Anonymous]

Brett’s a cuckoo clock.

You know at the end of an episode of Sherlock or something similar, the cool, sinister exterior of the master criminal gives way and you see he’s a complete lunatic? That’s Bretty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

If it’s credible, I’d push for it.

key word

Ford’s accusations fit that definition.

Plausible =/= credible

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that our country makes SEXUAL ASSAULT claims political is sickening. Since when is it Left or Right to be against sexual assault?

These claims are past the SOL but that does not mean they shouldn't be taken seriously for a job on SCOTUS.
But, that being said, I do fear we are paddling up a creek we will not be able to go back down. First with no hearing for Garland (bad GOP optics) and now this (people see this as the Dems being desperate), i fear we will NEVER get a full court either due to elections coming up or something from high school coming out.

Gorsuch was CONFIRMED and easily. Or do we just like the "both sides obstruct" story line?

+1 So was Roberts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who here saves their calendars?

I do, but I’m a nearly 40 woman who likes quilting, baking, and tatting and other past pursuits. The sodden frat boy keeping a calendar - and faithfully recording his drunken escapades - seems a bit too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who here saves their calendars?

I do. And I look at them.

- Someone older than Kavanaugh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

If it’s credible, I’d push for it.

key word

Ford’s accusations fit that definition.

Sure. If you consider credible a claim from 36 years ago in which the accuser cannot remember the date, the house, or how she got to and from the unknown house and the 4 people she named who were supposedly present have no recollection of such a party. Yeah, sure, it’s credible.

How many head injuries have you sustained that you haven’t heard or understood the several dozen explanations about that from your fellow DCUMers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I see something missing from this letter. A request that the proceedings be conducted in a “professional” manner with a real investigation to clear his name. If one is innocent wouldn’t one be screaming bloody murder to have a full investigation conducted by professionally trained Law Enforcement Officers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that our country makes SEXUAL ASSAULT claims political is sickening. Since when is it Left or Right to be against sexual assault?

These claims are past the SOL but that does not mean they shouldn't be taken seriously for a job on SCOTUS.
But, that being said, I do fear we are paddling up a creek we will not be able to go back down. First with no hearing for Garland (bad GOP optics) and now this (people see this as the Dems being desperate), i fear we will NEVER get a full court either due to elections coming up or something from high school coming out.

Gorsuch was CONFIRMED and easily. Or do we just like the "both sides obstruct" story line?

+1 So was Roberts.

This line is getting really old. Kavanaugh tips the court and we all know that is why some people are freaking out and willing to go to any length necessary a la Schumer.

[Anonymous]

^ the last sentence is incomplete and we don't have the second page - perhaps he did make such a request?