Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem now for the GOP is that they don't know what else is floating around out there. The knew about Ford and already had their game plan drawn out. But other shoes keep dropping and this WH finds itself on the defensive. They have no coherent strategy to deal with more allegations.

Personally, I think they try to ram through a Kavanaugh vote but two Republicans defect (Murkowski and Collins).

I am betting the GOP is actually expecting a lot more to “surface” because the Democrats will do “whatever it takes” to derail this nominee.
Thursday is on. It will be a busy day.

I think the Democrats would create allegations against Jesus if he were the nominee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that our country makes SEXUAL ASSAULT claims political is sickening. Since when is it Left or Right to be against sexual assault?

These claims are past the SOL but that does not mean they shouldn't be taken seriously for a job on SCOTUS.
But, that being said, I do fear we are paddling up a creek we will not be able to go back down. First with no hearing for Garland (bad GOP optics) and now this (people see this as the Dems being desperate), i fear we will NEVER get a full court either due to elections coming up or something from high school coming out.

Meh .. probably in 2021.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The problem now for the GOP is that they don't know what else is floating around out there. The knew about Ford and already had their game plan drawn out. But other shoes keep dropping and this WH finds itself on the defensive. They have no coherent strategy to deal with more allegations.

Personally, I think they try to ram through a Kavanaugh vote but two Republicans defect (Murkowski and Collins).

Flake won't go along with it either, IMO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't know who to believe and I don't understand how people can staunchly defend him or her with out facts . I'm looking forward to an investigation to see what that brings out.

The one and only rational post on this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem now for the GOP is that they don't know what else is floating around out there. The knew about Ford and already had their game plan drawn out. But other shoes keep dropping and this WH finds itself on the defensive. They have no coherent strategy to deal with more allegations.

Personally, I think they try to ram through a Kavanaugh vote but two Republicans defect (Murkowski and Collins).

I am betting the GOP is actually expecting a lot more to “surface” because the Democrats will do “whatever it takes” to derail this nominee.
Thursday is on. It will be a busy day.

I think the Democrats would create allegations against Jesus if he were the nominee.

I think it’s safe to say that at this point Jesus would vote Democrat.

[Anonymous]

So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

Al Franken. Dems do the right thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

If it’s credible, if push for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

If it’s credible, I’d push for it.

key word

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

If it’s credible, I’d push for it.

key word

People here are saying he needs to go because it is a "distraction" without any evidence this is credible, so when it happens and people say it is a "distraction" before knowing if it is credible, don't get mad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

Al Franken. Dems do the right thing.

There were photos, and it still took weeks...

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the Democrats nominate someone and a random Republican Woman makes a vague accusation, you guys will drop your nom too right? I bet it happens.

Al Franken. Dems do the right thing.

There were photos, and it still took weeks...

Franken wasn’t nominated. He was elected. Same situation as the alleged wife-beater Keith Ellison.
Shall we take bets on if Ellison will be held accountable by the voters? Or by the DNC?

[Anonymous]

Allegations from an accuser are considered evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I thought he should have been disqualified on the binge drinking and credit card debt alone, neither of which are disputed, and neither of which speak well of his character. So cry me a river BK!