Jon Stewart dismissing Louis CK abuse allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude, it was widely known gossip. This is what is mind boggling you don't understand the difference.

Again if it were such common knowledge why didn't you post it earlier?

Here’s a piece from a comedian who points out it was an open secret within the industry. I guess it was “gossip” in the same way talk about Weinstein’s actions was gossip.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/i-did-a-stand-up-set-about-louis-cks-offenses-but-it-didnt-feel-like-enough/2017/11/10/e1925700-c5da-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html?utm_term=.4061099b6803

Again this was published November 10, 2017. If you knew about it for so long, op/pp, why didn't you post the proof years ago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude, it was widely known gossip. This is what is mind boggling you don't understand the difference.

Again if it were such common knowledge why didn't you post it earlier?

Here’s a piece from a comedian who points out it was an open secret within the industry. I guess it was “gossip” in the same way talk about Weinstein’s actions was gossip.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/i-did-a-stand-up-set-about-louis-cks-offenses-but-it-didnt-feel-like-enough/2017/11/10/e1925700-c5da-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html?utm_term=.4061099b6803

Again this was published November 10, 2017. If you knew about it for so long, op/pp, why didn't you post the proof years ago?

This is an inane question, which is why I didn't answer it, because my not posting a DCUM thread is nowhere near equivalent to Stewart publicly supporting him and mocking and dismissing those who brought up his sex crimes. But... I wasn't on DCUM until very recently- again, not that it's relevant, but I'll be nice enough to entertain it.

Now that I've answered your inane question, answer the one you've dodged for several pages: Why don't you address how everyone reads Stewart as being dismissive and mocking and yet you read it as respectful? Care to address why your social perceptions are so off?

[Anonymous]

Pp, I have answered your question repeatedly about his tone and what he actually said. You keep deflecting that it's my social skills or lack there of. You're the one who hasn't answered my questions--what specifically was mocking about his words or behavior? You haven't answered b/c you can't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pp, I have answered your question repeatedly about his tone and what he actually said. You keep deflecting that it's my social skills or lack there of. You're the one who hasn't answered my questions--what specifically was mocking about his words or behavior? You haven't answered b/c you can't.

You have not addressed how everyone reads Stewart as being dismissive and mocking and yet you read it as respectful. Please answer that question in any regard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pp, I have answered your question repeatedly about his tone and what he actually said. You keep deflecting that it's my social skills or lack there of. You're the one who hasn't answered my questions--what specifically was mocking about his words or behavior? You haven't answered b/c you can't.

You have not addressed how everyone reads Stewart as being dismissive and mocking and yet you read it as respectful. Please answer that question in any regard.

Honey, more than one poster has pointed out what he said and how he said it. He looked directly into the questioners eyes, did not smile and said i"it's important."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pp, I have answered your question repeatedly about his tone and what he actually said. You keep deflecting that it's my social skills or lack there of. You're the one who hasn't answered my questions--what specifically was mocking about his words or behavior? You haven't answered b/c you can't.

You have not addressed how everyone reads Stewart as being dismissive and mocking and yet you read it as respectful. Please answer that question in any regard.

Honey, more than one poster has pointed out what he said and how he said it. He looked directly into the questioners eyes, did not smile and said i"it's important."

No, he didn't, and the vast majority of the posters have read Stewart as being dismissive and mocking. Additionally all the articles have done the same.

Can you address why you in particular think your opinion of it is so different from the majority?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude, it was widely known gossip. This is what is mind boggling you don't understand the difference.

Again if it were such common knowledge why didn't you post it earlier?

Here’s a piece from a comedian who points out it was an open secret within the industry. I guess it was “gossip” in the same way talk about Weinstein’s actions was gossip.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/i-did-a-stand-up-set-about-louis-cks-offenses-but-it-didnt-feel-like-enough/2017/11/10/e1925700-c5da-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html?utm_term=.4061099b6803

Again this was published November 10, 2017. If you knew about it for so long, op/pp, why didn't you post the proof years ago?

Lol. So you’re suggesting Barbadaro is lying in that piece that it was an open secret for years? Why would she lie?

I get the feeling no standard of proof would be sufficient in your mind. The only point at which you would accept that sexual harassment occurred is when the perpetrator owns up to it like Louis did. Before that, how do we know the women aren’t lying to the NYT? Is that the idea?

It’s getting hard to take you seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pp, I have answered your question repeatedly about his tone and what he actually said. You keep deflecting that it's my social skills or lack there of. You're the one who hasn't answered my questions--what specifically was mocking about his words or behavior? You haven't answered b/c you can't.

You have not addressed how everyone reads Stewart as being dismissive and mocking and yet you read it as respectful. Please answer that question in any regard.

Honey, more than one poster has pointed out what he said and how he said it. He looked directly into the questioners eyes, did not smile and said i"it's important."

Every journalist and every piece I’ve read on this topic has assessed his behavior as dismissive or some variant thereof. Just out of curiosity, can you show us a single reputable news source that describes it otherwise?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pp, I have answered your question repeatedly about his tone and what he actually said. You keep deflecting that it's my social skills or lack there of. You're the one who hasn't answered my questions--what specifically was mocking about his words or behavior? You haven't answered b/c you can't.

You have not addressed how everyone reads Stewart as being dismissive and mocking and yet you read it as respectful. Please answer that question in any regard.

Honey, more than one poster has pointed out what he said and how he said it. He looked directly into the questioners eyes, did not smile and said i"it's important."

No, he didn't, and the vast majority of the posters have read Stewart as being dismissive and mocking. Additionally all the articles have done the same.

Can you address why you in particular think your opinion of it is so different from the majority?

Again the majority of whom?

Op/pp,

You've said nothing to make me you're anything other than a paid lackey from a Russian troll farm. You've spent time and effort trying to discredit someone who has done a lot to protect journalists and distract from the real issue of sexual harassment and abuse. Putin must love you.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_dhneCO4YEE

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pp, I have answered your question repeatedly about his tone and what he actually said. You keep deflecting that it's my social skills or lack there of. You're the one who hasn't answered my questions--what specifically was mocking about his words or behavior? You haven't answered b/c you can't.

You have not addressed how everyone reads Stewart as being dismissive and mocking and yet you read it as respectful. Please answer that question in any regard.

Honey, more than one poster has pointed out what he said and how he said it. He looked directly into the questioners eyes, did not smile and said i"it's important."

No, he didn't, and the vast majority of the posters have read Stewart as being dismissive and mocking. Additionally all the articles have done the same.

Can you address why you in particular think your opinion of it is so different from the majority?

Again the majority of whom?

Op/pp,

You've said nothing to make me you're anything other than a paid lackey from a Russian troll farm. You've spent time and effort trying to discredit someone who has done a lot to protect journalists and distract from the real issue of sexual harassment and abuse. Putin must love you.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_dhneCO4YEE

The majority of posters on here and the vast majority of the articles that have come out about it, as stated in my previous post.

Can you address why you in particular think your opinion of it is so different from the majority?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pp, I have answered your question repeatedly about his tone and what he actually said. You keep deflecting that it's my social skills or lack there of. You're the one who hasn't answered my questions--what specifically was mocking about his words or behavior? You haven't answered b/c you can't.

You have not addressed how everyone reads Stewart as being dismissive and mocking and yet you read it as respectful. Please answer that question in any regard.

Honey, more than one poster has pointed out what he said and how he said it. He looked directly into the questioners eyes, did not smile and said i"it's important."

Every journalist and every piece I’ve read on this topic has assessed his behavior as dismissive or some variant thereof. Just out of curiosity, can you show us a single reputable news source that describes it otherwise?

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pp, I have answered your question repeatedly about his tone and what he actually said. You keep deflecting that it's my social skills or lack there of. You're the one who hasn't answered my questions--what specifically was mocking about his words or behavior? You haven't answered b/c you can't.

You have not addressed how everyone reads Stewart as being dismissive and mocking and yet you read it as respectful. Please answer that question in any regard.

Honey, more than one poster has pointed out what he said and how he said it. He looked directly into the questioners eyes, did not smile and said i"it's important."

No, he didn't, and the vast majority of the posters have read Stewart as being dismissive and mocking. Additionally all the articles have done the same.

Can you address why you in particular think your opinion of it is so different from the majority?

Again the majority of whom?

Op/pp,

You've said nothing to make me you're anything other than a paid lackey from a Russian troll farm. You've spent time and effort trying to discredit someone who has done a lot to protect journalists and distract from the real issue of sexual harassment and abuse. Putin must love you.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_dhneCO4YEE

Exactly, PP! Everyone who refuses to deny sexual harassment is a paid Russian troll!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pp, I have answered your question repeatedly about his tone and what he actually said. You keep deflecting that it's my social skills or lack there of. You're the one who hasn't answered my questions--what specifically was mocking about his words or behavior? You haven't answered b/c you can't.

You have not addressed how everyone reads Stewart as being dismissive and mocking and yet you read it as respectful. Please answer that question in any regard.

Honey, more than one poster has pointed out what he said and how he said it. He looked directly into the questioners eyes, did not smile and said i"it's important."

No, he didn't, and the vast majority of the posters have read Stewart as being dismissive and mocking. Additionally all the articles have done the same.

Can you address why you in particular think your opinion of it is so different from the majority?

Again the majority of whom?

Op/pp,

You've said nothing to make me you're anything other than a paid lackey from a Russian troll farm. You've spent time and effort trying to discredit someone who has done a lot to protect journalists and distract from the real issue of sexual harassment and abuse. Putin must love you.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_dhneCO4YEE

Exactly, PP! Everyone who refuses to deny sexual harassment is a paid Russian troll!!!

I wonder if the poster is doing deliberate parody at this point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pp, I have answered your question repeatedly about his tone and what he actually said. You keep deflecting that it's my social skills or lack there of. You're the one who hasn't answered my questions--what specifically was mocking about his words or behavior? You haven't answered b/c you can't.

You have not addressed how everyone reads Stewart as being dismissive and mocking and yet you read it as respectful. Please answer that question in any regard.

Honey, more than one poster has pointed out what he said and how he said it. He looked directly into the questioners eyes, did not smile and said i"it's important."

No, he didn't, and the vast majority of the posters have read Stewart as being dismissive and mocking. Additionally all the articles have done the same.

Can you address why you in particular think your opinion of it is so different from the majority?

Again the majority of whom?

Op/pp,

You've said nothing to make me you're anything other than a paid lackey from a Russian troll farm. You've spent time and effort trying to discredit someone who has done a lot to protect journalists and distract from the real issue of sexual harassment and abuse. Putin must love you.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_dhneCO4YEE

The majority of posters on here and the vast majority of the articles that have come out about it, as stated in my previous post.

Can you address why you in particular think your opinion of it is so different from the majority?

Of every article that you've read. So you're the authority on everyone? Do you might think that there are people who disagree agree with you who don't post?

Also what journalists? What news sources?

I'm not denying the abuse. I'm saying you're in a tizzy over a one minute Q & A exchange from a year ago that in the grand scheme of things mean nothing. Where is your outrage for all the CK apologists like all people on the tv shows that hired him and where he actually jerked off in front of production staff and actors? You're determined to make Stewart a scapegoat for not publicly shaming CK a year ago when there was only unsubstantiated rumors. That's why I believe you're a troll. Paid to get people arguing who are actually on the same side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pp, I have answered your question repeatedly about his tone and what he actually said. You keep deflecting that it's my social skills or lack there of. You're the one who hasn't answered my questions--what specifically was mocking about his words or behavior? You haven't answered b/c you can't.

You have not addressed how everyone reads Stewart as being dismissive and mocking and yet you read it as respectful. Please answer that question in any regard.

Honey, more than one poster has pointed out what he said and how he said it. He looked directly into the questioners eyes, did not smile and said i"it's important."

No, he didn't, and the vast majority of the posters have read Stewart as being dismissive and mocking. Additionally all the articles have done the same.

Can you address why you in particular think your opinion of it is so different from the majority?

Again the majority of whom?

Op/pp,

You've said nothing to make me you're anything other than a paid lackey from a Russian troll farm. You've spent time and effort trying to discredit someone who has done a lot to protect journalists and distract from the real issue of sexual harassment and abuse. Putin must love you.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_dhneCO4YEE

The majority of posters on here and the vast majority of the articles that have come out about it, as stated in my previous post.

Can you address why you in particular think your opinion of it is so different from the majority?

Of every article that you've read. So you're the authority on everyone? Do you might think that there are people who disagree agree with you who don't post?

Also what journalists? What news sources?

I'm not denying the abuse. I'm saying you're in a tizzy over a one minute Q & A exchange from a year ago that in the grand scheme of things mean nothing. Where is your outrage for all the CK apologists like all people on the tv shows that hired him and where he actually jerked off in front of production staff and actors? You're determined to make Stewart a scapegoat for not publicly shaming CK a year ago when there was only unsubstantiated rumors. That's why I believe you're a troll. Paid to get people arguing who are actually on the same side.

Yes, every article I read. As the other poster said, "Every journalist and every piece I’ve read on this topic has assessed his behavior as dismissive or some variant thereof. Just out of curiosity, can you show us a single reputable news source that describes it otherwise?"

And yes, we are upset at the enablers of sexual abuse. The fact that you think it's NBD is telling.