OP said he was in rural Sweden. I don't get cell service at my Mother-In-Laws in rural Virginia. Honestly, I doubt the kid thought it was a big deal to extend by a few days. He sounds like a responsible kid. |
Why leave her out, she is the one who started the topic. Using nonsense excuses to cover the fact she misses him. Its good she owned up to it, most people will continue to deny their real feelings rather than being honest with themselves. Sounds likes they raised a great kid to me, thatswhy i had a hard time understanding the outrage. By the way, why capitalize needs based? |
This is not your typical DCUM rich kid. And I meant leave OP out of the ridiculous "who is more mature - European or American kids" |
I appear to be in a significant minority, but even having read the whole thread I'm still struggling to understand (1) why it is necessary to consult the parents in this situation, and (2) why being out of communication when traveling in a rural area is bad/what further contact the parents actually need. I would have no problem with any 18+ year DC old of mine doing exactly as the OP's son did, given the following facts as I understand them: 1) The traveler is a legal adult for whom the parents are not legally responsible 2) The funds being used for the trip, extension, and fixing any travel delays that may arise are the traveler's own earned money. 3) The traveler made travel plans which do not require the parents to do anything or change their own schedules Basically, if a legal adult chooses to take on adult levels of autonomy, I would expect them to exercise corresponding levels of responsibility. If no action is needed from me, keeping me informed of plans is at most an appreciated courtesy and I would consider OP's DS's text to have done so adequately. |
| Sheesh....live a little. Hope he has a great time. |
| OP ~ he has had a tremendous amount of freedom. I don't see this itinerary change as very significant, not a significant detail. |
Bingo. He's not meaningfully contributing to the roof above his head, therefore he doesn't get meaningful adult choices. |
+1. The people saying "let it go" are social misfits. Whether you're 18 or 180, if you aren't communicating your plans with people you live with, you're not going to have a good relationship with them. |
This. What he did was disrespectful on a number of levels for someone who is and will continue to be financially dependent. |
Good point. This is permissive parenting gone cuckoo. The fact that he responded this way when given the long leash shows he wasn't ready for it. |
They lost control of their kids long before they turned 18; their only recourse is to try to turn other parents into failures too. |
Totally agree. |
Agreed. Although I have to question the parenting up to this point. When I was still in high school, despite my age and the fact that I was mature and level headed for my age, I never would have dreamed of doing something like this without first asking permission. I have to presume that OP has made some parenting choices that indicate that DS can do what he wants and not be punished or have consequences. So own that, OP. |
|
"Adult" kids are usually expected to financially support themselves, as well.
This kid is taking advantage of the benefits of adulthood, while rejecting the responsibilities. He obviously expects his parents to continue treating him like a minor, financially. He's clearly "entitled". |
|
This kid needs to get handed some adult responsibilities when he decides to come back to Mommy and Daddy.
Consequences of his "adult" choices are in order, OP. Carefully discuss the possibilities with your husband. Then maybe the first weekend after your son is home, have a sit down him to see what he thinks he can manage. Don't get into it until then. Just let him know you're glad he had a nice time and he's home safely. |