Is it now "in style/cool" for teen girls to be in romantic relationships with other girls?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing these girls aren't really bi or lesbians but rather 'lipstick lesbians.' Perhaps they think they'll be more attractive to boys if they act that way. There is so much girl on girl porn nowadays that the kids have access to.. Probably think that's the 'cool' thing to do.

I don't think that means what you think it means.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing these girls aren't really bi or lesbians but rather 'lipstick lesbians.' Perhaps they think they'll be more attractive to boys if they act that way. There is so much girl on girl porn nowadays that the kids have access to.. Probably think that's the 'cool' thing to do.

This is one of many reasons that my kids will never set foot in a public school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Polygamy is with consenting adults
Incest can also be with consenting adults

What if your 19yr old daughter and husband wanted a sexual relationship? Consenting adults. Decided to fight for the right to get married. They are in love. They can't help who they fall in love with. Is it wrong?

What if one man and 4 women all want to get married in DC and fight to have equal rights. Is it wrong?

There is no difference.

Shorter PP: I oppose legal marriage for 2 unrelated adult men or 2 unrelated adult women because I oppose incestuous marriage and polygamy.

Not a very logical argument.

Actually it truly is. Can you explain how it is not?

Because marriage for 2 unrelated adult men or 2 unrelated adult women is neither incestuous nor polygamy.

It's like saying, "I don't like pepperoni pizza because I don't like anchovies or black olives."

That is not the point. Gays/lesbians were once considered taboo and are now fighting and receiving equal rights. Transgendered are on their role. So why not polygamy? Also considered taboo, also unrelated. Why can't they fight for their rights? Why can't a father/daughter? Cousins can in some states. Why not other family members?

No difference. Just perception.

So, even if this were true, why does it bother you so much? Most people don't fall in love with their relatives (there are strong biological reasons that prevent this), just as most people aren't interested in a committed relationship with more than one person at the same time (trying to maintain a relationship with just one is complicated enough). So how does it affect you if the rare brother and sister, or Tom, Dick and Jane who feel this way about each other are able to get married?

Because it is the government condoning, and therefore forcing all of us to accept, a deviant, perverted behavior. That is not healthy for any sane society.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing these girls aren't really bi or lesbians but rather 'lipstick lesbians.' Perhaps they think they'll be more attractive to boys if they act that way. There is so much girl on girl porn nowadays that the kids have access to.. Probably think that's the 'cool' thing to do.

This is one of many reasons that my kids will never set foot in a public school.

I don't understand. Do you think that the kids are watching "girl-on-girl porn" in public school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing these girls aren't really bi or lesbians but rather 'lipstick lesbians.' Perhaps they think they'll be more attractive to boys if they act that way. There is so much girl on girl porn nowadays that the kids have access to.. Probably think that's the 'cool' thing to do.

This is one of many reasons that my kids will never set foot in a public school.

I don't understand. Do you think that the kids are watching "girl-on-girl porn" in public school?

LOL- those kids will be in for a shock when (if?) they move out of PP's basement. Seriously- how long do people think their little snowflakes can live in a bubble playing with only wood blocks?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing these girls aren't really bi or lesbians but rather 'lipstick lesbians.' Perhaps they think they'll be more attractive to boys if they act that way. There is so much girl on girl porn nowadays that the kids have access to.. Probably think that's the 'cool' thing to do.

This is one of many reasons that my kids will never set foot in a public school.

I don't understand. Do you think that the kids are watching "girl-on-girl porn" in public school?

No. But they will go to schools where it is clearly understood and taught that this behavior is wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, even if this were true, why does it bother you so much? Most people don't fall in love with their relatives (there are strong biological reasons that prevent this), just as most people aren't interested in a committed relationship with more than one person at the same time (trying to maintain a relationship with just one is complicated enough). So how does it affect you if the rare brother and sister, or Tom, Dick and Jane who feel this way about each other are able to get married?

Because it is the government condoning, and therefore forcing all of us to accept, a deviant, perverted behavior. That is not healthy for any sane society.

Aha. You think that same-sex marriage should be illegal because you think that same-sex relationships are deviant and perverted. Why not just say so? Why all the irrelevant distraction about incest, polygamy, and group sex with squirrels?

In any case, luckily for you, the government is not actually forcing you to accept anything besides the fact that a legal marriage is a legal marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing these girls aren't really bi or lesbians but rather 'lipstick lesbians.' Perhaps they think they'll be more attractive to boys if they act that way. There is so much girl on girl porn nowadays that the kids have access to.. Probably think that's the 'cool' thing to do.

This is one of many reasons that my kids will never set foot in a public school.

I don't understand. Do you think that the kids are watching "girl-on-girl porn" in public school?

No. But they will go to schools where it is clearly understood and taught that this behavior is wrong.

Which will only make it more tantalizing and alluring... Ah, teenagers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Because it is the government condoning, and therefore forcing all of us to accept, a deviant, perverted behavior. That is not healthy for any sane society.

How many people have you ever met who are gay or lesbian? How many people do you currently know who are gay or lesbian?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing these girls aren't really bi or lesbians but rather 'lipstick lesbians.' Perhaps they think they'll be more attractive to boys if they act that way. There is so much girl on girl porn nowadays that the kids have access to.. Probably think that's the 'cool' thing to do.

This is one of many reasons that my kids will never set foot in a public school.

I don't understand. Do you think that the kids are watching "girl-on-girl porn" in public school?

No. But they will go to schools where it is clearly understood and taught that this behavior is wrong.

Which will only make it more tantalizing and alluring... Ah, teenagers.

Or worse. Make them a statistic. Children who are raised to believe that being LGBTQ is "wrong" are at very high risk of suicide if they are LGBTQ, especially during those teen years. The risk is highest for transgender people - something like 34% of transgender people attempt suicide. My children (and we have five) were raised to believe that there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay. It's not an illness or a character defect. It is no different that being heterosexual. It just is. Mine are all grown and all five are straight. However, one of my daughters (college senior) is very involved in the LGBTQ movement because she has a close friend who experienced severe bullying in high school and tried to end her life. Our church is offering diversity classes every month to try to improve acceptance and understanding. I feel so passionately about this because I've seen up close how hurtful words and behaviors affect teens who are already struggling.

Just as an aside - One of my oldest and dearest friends is very Fundie Southern Baptist. Her three kids were in private Christian Schools from preschool through 12th grade. Her kids were taught to "pray away the gay" and all that other nonsense. Her oldest (now 19) came out about six months ago. To me. I'm thankful he felt safe coming to me. I cannot image the struggle he must have gone though.

I'm not asking for the ugly posters to learn tolerance or compassion. There are people who just are not ready for that path. However, if you can't be tolerant, can you at least try to shut the hell up about things you don't understand. Sometimes it's better to remain silent and be assumed ignorant than it is to open your mouth and confirm it. Lives are at risk. You hurt people with your intolerance. Just keep your narrow-minded opinions to yourself so that the rest of us can focus on supporting those who are struggling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Girls have learned they will get more attention from boys if they feign bi-sexual interests. It's amazing how long a guy can be strung along hoping his so called bisexual girlfriend will invite him into a threesome.

Now that's pretty funny. These kids are going nuts.

But it is VERY true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing these girls aren't really bi or lesbians but rather 'lipstick lesbians.' Perhaps they think they'll be more attractive to boys if they act that way. There is so much girl on girl porn nowadays that the kids have access to.. Probably think that's the 'cool' thing to do.

This is one of many reasons that my kids will never set foot in a public school.

Ha ha, I went to private school and knew much more about lesbians back in the 90s than the public school kids did. "Lipstick lesbian" does not mean what the poster above think it means.

Then I went to a private college where there was the whole "LUG" thing (lesbian until graduation.) I still don't get that, but a larger number of college girls at my school had only lesbian relationships until they graduated--then most went on to marry guys and have kids. One or two were actually lesbian. Part of the fun of college social life was dating different guys for me, but being a LUG seemed to offer protection for some girls from the pressure to date guys until they were ready.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, even if this were true, why does it bother you so much? Most people don't fall in love with their relatives (there are strong biological reasons that prevent this), just as most people aren't interested in a committed relationship with more than one person at the same time (trying to maintain a relationship with just one is complicated enough). So how does it affect you if the rare brother and sister, or Tom, Dick and Jane who feel this way about each other are able to get married?

Because it is the government condoning, and therefore forcing all of us to accept, a deviant, perverted behavior. That is not healthy for any sane society.

Aha. You think that same-sex marriage should be illegal because you think that same-sex relationships are deviant and perverted. Why not just say so? Why all the irrelevant distraction about incest, polygamy, and group sex with squirrels?

In any case, luckily for you, the government is not actually forcing you to accept anything besides the fact that a legal marriage is a legal marriage.

Just to let you know I was the poster of the comparing polygamy to gay marriage. I did not post the government condoning etc.. post. I am actually not opposed to gay marriages. I just don't understand the hatred agenda for complete equality in everything. They want to get married in churches, sue and destroy people if a company doesn't want to make their wedding cake, force it down everyone's throats. If they were content with a civil marriage and be fine not everyone is going to like them, then fine. Because not everyone is going to be okay with it. It was taboo for so long and for many very religious people, it is considered a sin. My point being if that they want it all forms of government, state and church to consider it normal, if transgender and cross dressing is now becoming normal, why not a push for polygamy, for adult compliant incest, pedophilia etc.... Where is the line in the sand if everyone can claim "I can't help who I am or who I fall in love with?" How can we say it is okay to be gay but not the others? You keep telling me there are reasons for it but there really isn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing these girls aren't really bi or lesbians but rather 'lipstick lesbians.' Perhaps they think they'll be more attractive to boys if they act that way. There is so much girl on girl porn nowadays that the kids have access to.. Probably think that's the 'cool' thing to do.

This is one of many reasons that my kids will never set foot in a public school.

Ha ha, I went to private school and knew much more about lesbians back in the 90s than the public school kids did. "Lipstick lesbian" does not mean what the poster above think it means.

Then I went to a private college where there was the whole "LUG" thing (lesbian until graduation.) I still don't get that, but a larger number of college girls at my school had only lesbian relationships until they graduated--then most went on to marry guys and have kids. One or two were actually lesbian. Part of the fun of college social life was dating different guys for me, but being a LUG seemed to offer protection for some girls from the pressure to date guys until they were ready.

A lipstick lesbian is a girly girl "lesbian" who most true lesbians feel is doing it for attention, trying it out or to impress guys. No more, no less.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, even if this were true, why does it bother you so much? Most people don't fall in love with their relatives (there are strong biological reasons that prevent this), just as most people aren't interested in a committed relationship with more than one person at the same time (trying to maintain a relationship with just one is complicated enough). So how does it affect you if the rare brother and sister, or Tom, Dick and Jane who feel this way about each other are able to get married?

Because it is the government condoning, and therefore forcing all of us to accept, a deviant, perverted behavior. That is not healthy for any sane society.

Aha. You think that same-sex marriage should be illegal because you think that same-sex relationships are deviant and perverted. Why not just say so? Why all the irrelevant distraction about incest, polygamy, and group sex with squirrels?

In any case, luckily for you, the government is not actually forcing you to accept anything besides the fact that a legal marriage is a legal marriage.

Just to let you know I was the poster of the comparing polygamy to gay marriage. I did not post the government condoning etc.. post. I am actually not opposed to gay marriages. I just don't understand the hatred agenda for complete equality in everything. They want to get married in churches, sue and destroy people if a company doesn't want to make their wedding cake, force it down everyone's throats. If they were content with a civil marriage and be fine not everyone is going to like them, then fine. Because not everyone is going to be okay with it. It was taboo for so long and for many very religious people, it is considered a sin. My point being if that they want it all forms of government, state and church to consider it normal, if transgender and cross dressing is now becoming normal, why not a push for polygamy, for adult compliant incest, pedophilia etc.... Where is the line in the sand if everyone can claim "I can't help who I am or who I fall in love with?" How can we say it is okay to be gay but not the others? You keep telling me there are reasons for it but there really isn't.

The line in the sand is simple. Equal protection under the law. Period.