Married coworkers want me but I'm to heavy for hubby

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We're really saying that the person who would have the easiest time getting laid by third parties should call the shots within the relationship? That's a formula for female privilege if there ever was one given how much easier it is for a willing woman to get sex from an anonymous guy than vice versa.

Yup! It's called sexual economics! Sorry boo!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're really saying that the person who would have the easiest time getting laid by third parties should call the shots within the relationship? That's a formula for female privilege if there ever was one given how much easier it is for a willing woman to get sex from an anonymous guy than vice versa.

Yup! It's called sexual economics! Sorry boo!

The case for sexual economics requires that all sexual contact is seen as having equal value. Clearly, for the OP sex with her husband is more valuable than sex with flirty colleagues (or else she wouldn't be posting here). The fact that she gets no sexual interest from her husband is clearly not mitigated by availability of outside sexual advances. It's like saying there's plenty of ghetto shacks available for purchase - yes there are, but doesn't mean you want them. Sorry, economic fail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're really saying that the person who would have the easiest time getting laid by third parties should call the shots within the relationship? That's a formula for female privilege if there ever was one given how much easier it is for a willing woman to get sex from an anonymous guy than vice versa.

Yup! It's called sexual economics! Sorry boo!

The case for sexual economics requires that all sexual contact is seen as having equal value. Clearly, for the OP sex with her husband is more valuable than sex with flirty colleagues (or else she wouldn't be posting here). The fact that she gets no sexual interest from her husband is clearly not mitigated by availability of outside sexual advances. It's like saying there's plenty of ghetto shacks available for purchase - yes there are, but doesn't mean you want them. Sorry, economic fail.

No, it's not that she sees sex with her husband as having equal value. It's that currently she's constrained to having sex with him because of a legally binding contract which includes sexual fidelity. However, she's obviously thought about sex with these other men since she mentioned them. I highly doubt that out of all five, her husband is the best. Otherwise OP would have mentioned it.