ECNL moving to school year part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice

Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡

9/1+30/60 is even better.

You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group.

This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.

Yea I saw a the ECNL guys mention this at minute 3:25

https://youtu.be/lMbhMm4dmA0?si=1vXH7NKt_dri0t5J

Finally! some people get it.

Leagues don't have to be 100% binary. There are options that can be implemented that address trapped players entirely even the edge case SY ones.

Pay attention. They aren't ECNL guys and don't mention allowing players to cheat and play down.

One person mentions having Sept play up a year if they are up a grade. It would be pointless if course because players can always play up.

The exact quote was...

"And then theyre going to make it Setember 1 and 2 teams will still have trapped players" he was saying that under SY with a 9/1 cutoff that there would still be teams with trapped players.

"so then I heard that they were going to do September 1 but if you were up the year in grades, in the school you'd stay with that..." this is another way of saying a 9/1 cutoff but if you're an Aug birthday you cant play down. Which is just a variation of 9/1+30/60.

What this means is that US Soccer and maybe US Club was considering 9/1 with a rule that Aug birthdays can only play with their birthday in school. I bet idiots like the guy screaming against 9/1+30/60 drowned out the logic pushing for the dumbest solution possible. This is when they switched to 8/1.

No, he wanted to force Sept kids to play up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice

Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡

9/1+30/60 is even better.

You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group.

This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.

Yea I saw a the ECNL guys mention this at minute 3:25

https://youtu.be/lMbhMm4dmA0?si=1vXH7NKt_dri0t5J

Finally! some people get it.

Leagues don't have to be 100% binary. There are options that can be implemented that address trapped players entirely even the edge case SY ones.

Pay attention. They aren't ECNL guys and don't mention allowing players to cheat and play down.

One person mentions having Sept play up a year if they are up a grade. It would be pointless if course because players can always play up.

One of the guys from the video is an ECNL girls coach. Sounds like they are looking into options.

The best one of course being grad year baby! Hold those 8th graders back!!

idk if one random coach and a side training Klingon taking shop over 6 months ago is a signal that they are in the know on real deliberations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice

Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡

9/1+30/60 is even better.

You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group.

This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.

Yea I saw a the ECNL guys mention this at minute 3:25

https://youtu.be/lMbhMm4dmA0?si=1vXH7NKt_dri0t5J

Finally! some people get it.

Leagues don't have to be 100% binary. There are options that can be implemented that address trapped players entirely even the edge case SY ones.

Pay attention. They aren't ECNL guys and don't mention allowing players to cheat and play down.

One person mentions having Sept play up a year if they are up a grade. It would be pointless if course because players can always play up.

One of the guys from the video is an ECNL girls coach. Sounds like they are looking into options.

The best one of course being grad year baby! Hold those 8th graders back!!

idk if one random coach and a side training Klingon taking shop over 6 months ago is a signal that they are in the know on real deliberations.

For sure… the random ECNL coach seemed like he has heard some real info on what is being discussed. Which is more credible than most things we read or hear about.

[Anonymous]

We fell into soccer with our kids. Come from a football/baseball/basketball background.

I promise you grad year is not the answer! If they do it you all might as well pencil your kids in for a second year of 8th grade

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice

Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡

9/1+30/60 is even better.

You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group.

This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.

Yea I saw a the ECNL guys mention this at minute 3:25

https://youtu.be/lMbhMm4dmA0?si=1vXH7NKt_dri0t5J

Finally! some people get it.

Leagues don't have to be 100% binary. There are options that can be implemented that address trapped players entirely even the edge case SY ones.

Pay attention. They aren't ECNL guys and don't mention allowing players to cheat and play down.

One person mentions having Sept play up a year if they are up a grade. It would be pointless if course because players can always play up.

One of the guys from the video is an ECNL girls coach. Sounds like they are looking into options.

The best one of course being grad year baby! Hold those 8th graders back!!

idk if one random coach and a side training Klingon taking shop over 6 months ago is a signal that they are in the know on real deliberations.

For sure… the random ECNL coach seemed like he has heard some real info on what is being discussed. Which is more credible than most things we read or hear about.

That convo is old news and they were off. They went with 8/1.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We fell into soccer with our kids. Come from a football/baseball/basketball background.

I promise you grad year is not the answer! If they do it you all might as well pencil your kids in for a second year of 8th grade

I pretty sure most people agree. GY encourages holding kids back in school.

But unfortunately there are parents that just cant wait to play down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice

Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡

9/1+30/60 is even better.

You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group.

This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.

Yea I saw a the ECNL guys mention this at minute 3:25

https://youtu.be/lMbhMm4dmA0?si=1vXH7NKt_dri0t5J

Finally! some people get it.

Leagues don't have to be 100% binary. There are options that can be implemented that address trapped players entirely even the edge case SY ones.

Pay attention. They aren't ECNL guys and don't mention allowing players to cheat and play down.

One person mentions having Sept play up a year if they are up a grade. It would be pointless if course because players can always play up.

One of the guys from the video is an ECNL girls coach. Sounds like they are looking into options.

The best one of course being grad year baby! Hold those 8th graders back!!

idk if one random coach and a side training Klingon taking shop over 6 months ago is a signal that they are in the know on real deliberations.

For sure… the random ECNL coach seemed like he has heard some real info on what is being discussed. Which is more credible than most things we read or hear about.

He knew that somthing like 9/1+30/60 was being considered. Mathmatically it just makes sense.

ECNL will likely implement some kind of rule to not allow Aug birthdays to play down. If their district starts on an odd date allowing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice

Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡

9/1+30/60 is even better.

You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group.

This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.

Yea I saw a the ECNL guys mention this at minute 3:25

https://youtu.be/lMbhMm4dmA0?si=1vXH7NKt_dri0t5J

Finally! some people get it.

Leagues don't have to be 100% binary. There are options that can be implemented that address trapped players entirely even the edge case SY ones.

Pay attention. They aren't ECNL guys and don't mention allowing players to cheat and play down.

One person mentions having Sept play up a year if they are up a grade. It would be pointless if course because players can always play up.

The exact quote was...

"And then theyre going to make it Setember 1 and 2 teams will still have trapped players" he was saying that under SY with a 9/1 cutoff that there would still be teams with trapped players.

"so then I heard that they were going to do September 1 but if you were up the year in grades, in the school you'd stay with that..." this is another way of saying a 9/1 cutoff but if you're an Aug birthday you cant play down. Which is just a variation of 9/1+30/60.

What this means is that US Soccer and maybe US Club was considering 9/1 with a rule that Aug birthdays can only play with their birthday in school. I bet idiots like the guy screaming against 9/1+30/60 drowned out the logic pushing for the dumbest solution possible. This is when they switched to 8/1.

No, he wanted to force Sept kids to play up.

Do you even think before commenting?

Making Sept players play up just doesnt make sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice

Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡

9/1+30/60 is even better.

You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group.

This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.

Yea I saw a the ECNL guys mention this at minute 3:25

https://youtu.be/lMbhMm4dmA0?si=1vXH7NKt_dri0t5J

Finally! some people get it.

Leagues don't have to be 100% binary. There are options that can be implemented that address trapped players entirely even the edge case SY ones.

Pay attention. They aren't ECNL guys and don't mention allowing players to cheat and play down.

One person mentions having Sept play up a year if they are up a grade. It would be pointless if course because players can always play up.

One of the guys from the video is an ECNL girls coach. Sounds like they are looking into options.

The best one of course being grad year baby! Hold those 8th graders back!!

idk if one random coach and a side training Klingon taking shop over 6 months ago is a signal that they are in the know on real deliberations.

For sure… the random ECNL coach seemed like he has heard some real info on what is being discussed. Which is more credible than most things we read or hear about.

He knew that somthing like 9/1+30/60 was being considered. Mathmatically it just makes sense.

ECNL will likely implement some kind of rule to not allow Aug birthdays to play down. If their district starts on an odd date allowing it.

Not even close to his rambling. You are having + delusions in your continuation of a pump and dump scheme of an idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice

Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡

9/1+30/60 is even better.

You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group.

This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.

Yea I saw a the ECNL guys mention this at minute 3:25

https://youtu.be/lMbhMm4dmA0?si=1vXH7NKt_dri0t5J

Finally! some people get it.

Leagues don't have to be 100% binary. There are options that can be implemented that address trapped players entirely even the edge case SY ones.

Pay attention. They aren't ECNL guys and don't mention allowing players to cheat and play down.

One person mentions having Sept play up a year if they are up a grade. It would be pointless if course because players can always play up.

One of the guys from the video is an ECNL girls coach. Sounds like they are looking into options.

The best one of course being grad year baby! Hold those 8th graders back!!

idk if one random coach and a side training Klingon taking shop over 6 months ago is a signal that they are in the know on real deliberations.

For sure… the random ECNL coach seemed like he has heard some real info on what is being discussed. Which is more credible than most things we read or hear about.

He knew that somthing like 9/1+30/60 was being considered. Mathmatically it just makes sense.

ECNL will likely implement some kind of rule to not allow Aug birthdays to play down. If their district starts on an odd date allowing it.

Not even close to his rambling. You are having + delusions in your continuation of a pump and dump scheme of an idea.

Please explain how allowing Aug birthdays to play down a grade helps ECNL. I'll wait...

Recruiters will be looking at a team of players that are graduating in X but theres 1 or 2 that are graduating in Y? From a recruiters perspective this is annoying because they're not graduating the year that youre expecting. But also how do you evaluate a player that might look really good but they're playjng against teams where most players are a year younger.

You are dumb

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice

Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡

9/1+30/60 is even better.

You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group.

This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.

Yea I saw a the ECNL guys mention this at minute 3:25

https://youtu.be/lMbhMm4dmA0?si=1vXH7NKt_dri0t5J

Finally! some people get it.

Leagues don't have to be 100% binary. There are options that can be implemented that address trapped players entirely even the edge case SY ones.

Pay attention. They aren't ECNL guys and don't mention allowing players to cheat and play down.

One person mentions having Sept play up a year if they are up a grade. It would be pointless if course because players can always play up.

The exact quote was...

"And then theyre going to make it Setember 1 and 2 teams will still have trapped players" he was saying that under SY with a 9/1 cutoff that there would still be teams with trapped players.

"so then I heard that they were going to do September 1 but if you were up the year in grades, in the school you'd stay with that..." this is another way of saying a 9/1 cutoff but if you're an Aug birthday you cant play down. Which is just a variation of 9/1+30/60.

What this means is that US Soccer and maybe US Club was considering 9/1 with a rule that Aug birthdays can only play with their birthday in school. I bet idiots like the guy screaming against 9/1+30/60 drowned out the logic pushing for the dumbest solution possible. This is when they switched to 8/1.

No, he wanted to force Sept kids to play up.

Do you even think before commenting?

Making Sept players play up just doesnt make sense.

Talk to the guy rambling in Jan, "going to okay September 1 but if you're up the year in grades in the school you stay with that" So yes, forcing kids who often went to school early to play up a year.

Do you even think before commenting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice

Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡

9/1+30/60 is even better.

You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group.

This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.

Yea I saw a the ECNL guys mention this at minute 3:25

https://youtu.be/lMbhMm4dmA0?si=1vXH7NKt_dri0t5J

Finally! some people get it.

Leagues don't have to be 100% binary. There are options that can be implemented that address trapped players entirely even the edge case SY ones.

Pay attention. They aren't ECNL guys and don't mention allowing players to cheat and play down.

One person mentions having Sept play up a year if they are up a grade. It would be pointless if course because players can always play up.

The exact quote was...

"And then theyre going to make it Setember 1 and 2 teams will still have trapped players" he was saying that under SY with a 9/1 cutoff that there would still be teams with trapped players.

"so then I heard that they were going to do September 1 but if you were up the year in grades, in the school you'd stay with that..." this is another way of saying a 9/1 cutoff but if you're an Aug birthday you cant play down. Which is just a variation of 9/1+30/60.

What this means is that US Soccer and maybe US Club was considering 9/1 with a rule that Aug birthdays can only play with their birthday in school. I bet idiots like the guy screaming against 9/1+30/60 drowned out the logic pushing for the dumbest solution possible. This is when they switched to 8/1.

No, he wanted to force Sept kids to play up.

Do you even think before commenting?

Making Sept players play up just doesnt make sense.

Talk to the guy rambling in Jan, "going to okay September 1 but if you're up the year in grades in the school you stay with that" So yes, forcing kids who often went to school early to play up a year.

Do you even think before commenting?

I have no idea what youre trying to convey.

I don't think you do either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice

Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡

9/1+30/60 is even better.

You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group.

This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.

Yea I saw a the ECNL guys mention this at minute 3:25

https://youtu.be/lMbhMm4dmA0?si=1vXH7NKt_dri0t5J

Finally! some people get it.

Leagues don't have to be 100% binary. There are options that can be implemented that address trapped players entirely even the edge case SY ones.

Pay attention. They aren't ECNL guys and don't mention allowing players to cheat and play down.

One person mentions having Sept play up a year if they are up a grade. It would be pointless if course because players can always play up.

One of the guys from the video is an ECNL girls coach. Sounds like they are looking into options.

The best one of course being grad year baby! Hold those 8th graders back!!

idk if one random coach and a side training Klingon taking shop over 6 months ago is a signal that they are in the know on real deliberations.

For sure… the random ECNL coach seemed like he has heard some real info on what is being discussed. Which is more credible than most things we read or hear about.

He knew that somthing like 9/1+30/60 was being considered. Mathmatically it just makes sense.

ECNL will likely implement some kind of rule to not allow Aug birthdays to play down. If their district starts on an odd date allowing it.

Not even close to his rambling. You are having + delusions in your continuation of a pump and dump scheme of an idea.

Please explain how allowing Aug birthdays to play down a grade helps ECNL. I'll wait...

Recruiters will be looking at a team of players that are graduating in X but theres 1 or 2 that are graduating in Y? From a recruiters perspective this is annoying because they're not graduating the year that youre expecting. But also how do you evaluate a player that might look really good but they're playjng against teams where most players are a year younger.

You are dumb

ECNL, like all leagues, is balancing maximizing revenue by convincing customers of a bright future (college ball). If the customers feel that there is cheating or the perception of cheating, they will raise Cain, as seen by the interest in said topic. College coaches aren't the true revenue source, they are a marketing vehicle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice

Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡

9/1+30/60 is even better.

You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group.

This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.

Yea I saw a the ECNL guys mention this at minute 3:25

https://youtu.be/lMbhMm4dmA0?si=1vXH7NKt_dri0t5J

Finally! some people get it.

Leagues don't have to be 100% binary. There are options that can be implemented that address trapped players entirely even the edge case SY ones.

Pay attention. They aren't ECNL guys and don't mention allowing players to cheat and play down.

One person mentions having Sept play up a year if they are up a grade. It would be pointless if course because players can always play up.

The exact quote was...

"And then theyre going to make it Setember 1 and 2 teams will still have trapped players" he was saying that under SY with a 9/1 cutoff that there would still be teams with trapped players.

"so then I heard that they were going to do September 1 but if you were up the year in grades, in the school you'd stay with that..." this is another way of saying a 9/1 cutoff but if you're an Aug birthday you cant play down. Which is just a variation of 9/1+30/60.

What this means is that US Soccer and maybe US Club was considering 9/1 with a rule that Aug birthdays can only play with their birthday in school. I bet idiots like the guy screaming against 9/1+30/60 drowned out the logic pushing for the dumbest solution possible. This is when they switched to 8/1.

No, he wanted to force Sept kids to play up.

Do you even think before commenting?

Making Sept players play up just doesnt make sense.

Talk to the guy rambling in Jan, "going to okay September 1 but if you're up the year in grades in the school you stay with that" So yes, forcing kids who often went to school early to play up a year.

Do you even think before commenting?

I have no idea what youre trying to convey.

I don't think you do either.

Keep up, guy was saying that leagues thought about forcing Sept. births to play up if the were up a grade, ostensibly to create grade groups.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We fell into soccer with our kids. Come from a football/baseball/basketball background.

I promise you grad year is not the answer! If they do it you all might as well pencil your kids in for a second year of 8th grade

On the boys side it’s not a bad idea as they are competing with 20 year olds coming from Europe. That extra year might level the playfield as far as recruiting goes.

Girls side won’t matter because 99% of girls would not allow themselves to be held back.