That is certainly not the tenor of this thread. |
That's not how you get to know someone. You can do things like a background check, pay attention to their friend group, watch for red flag activities (like when you go to the beach, do they oggle young girls?), meet their family to confirm their parents are still married, their dad isn't a creep, and they get along with their siblings and neices/nephews and confirm are no skeletons in the closet, and ask thoughtful but not accusatory questions. But even if you do all this, you can't be "sure" they won't abuse your child. There is nothing you can do to get certainty on this issue. Categories like f'ed up family, stepmon, stepkid, stepsiblings are popular on porn sites, which is another indication this is a considerable risk with a large part of the population. I'm wondering how old OP is. If OP is a 28-year-old widow, and she met a single man with no kids who wants to marry her and have more kids for her, and she, too, wants a bigger family, maybe it is worth the risk for some people in OP's shoes. However, if OP is done having kids, or he doesn't want to have kids with her, or he has kids (especially if he has boys), then cohabitation is just plain stupid. What would OP gain from cohabitation, and at what cost? |
Most of the users here are certifiable for sure. |
Nonetheless it is true. |
You miss the point of the post. You’re discussing all ways to possibly vet someone, but the gist of this thread is you can never ever be sure, so always be suspicious and limit contact. My point is that the prospective partner should know he will always be under suspicion until DD enters adulthood. He should be told that now, he may not want to move forward under any circumstance with any form of relationship, given this. |
No intelligent man or woman would proceed in that relationship. But kudos for being honest about it. |
Probably wise advice about dating a single mom under any circumstances. |
So it's...it's a woman's fault if her partner molests her child? It is the molester's fault. |
Always ask "who initiated the divorce". If the man initiated it and left, then don't date him. If the woman initiated it and left, then don't date her. People who run off from a marriage are damaged people. They knew who they were marrying, or else were blind to it the whole time. Either way, the one who leaves is almost always damaged goods. |
Your missing a key fact about this. See if you can find it on your own. |
The one who chose to marry a damaged person is also damaged — in a very different way, obviously. It helps no one to ignore this reality. |
Apparently if you initiate a divorce because your spouse cheated, you are the damaged person and everyone should avoid you.
|
This doesn't need to be said out loud. Any man dating a single mom will always be under suspicion. Obviously. |
That’s one of many reasons why you don’t date single moms. Ever. |
Totally disagree under the circumstances of OP, but that’s ok. |