Van Hollen in El Salvador

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We still have an American held by Hamas. Why is Van Hollen silent? Don’t tell me it’s because that man isn’t from Maryland because either is Garcia.

He has called on all hostages being released. IOW he isn't being silent.

Let me know when Van Hollen flies out to Gaza.

It's a bit different. There's a war going on in Gaza. There is no war in El Salvador.

The US government illegally sent this man to an El Salvadorian prison. The US government didn't send Americans to Gaza.

And the US government didn’t send an American to El Salvador, but a Salvadoran national.

That Van Hollen is doing a one man rescue mission for an illegal immigrants is LOL dumb.

So you MAGA bots keep telling us. What are your thoughts about the Supreme Court unanimously finding that the government should facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return? They know he’s a Salvadoran national.

Read it again. Facilitate his “release in El Salvador” not return. And chastised the judge saying to consider executive authority/article2 powers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've known Chris Van Hollen since the mid-90s when I worked with him at the General Assembly. He is the real deal. This is because he cares, and it's not a political stunt. The US government did something horribly wrong and he's trying to fix it.

Then why does this “real deal” democract want to return a known criminal with gang ties and an illegal immigrant to the United States?

What is so “real deal” about that?

Can you please explain this? Because to a normal person in the center, it frankly sounds insane.

Russian troll.

Stop the name calling and answer the question. No one’s buying the idea there are a bunch of Russians here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep beating this horse, MAGA

It's very obvious

You can tell they know this is going very badly for them. The propaganda machine has been turned up to 10.

Even the Hill has posted a story saying this case works in Trump’s favor. Open your eyes.

Post the story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder of Van Hollen was aware of the two restraining orders against him for beating his wife before he went on this little excursion.

.

Now it’s up to two, lol? Has a credible news source carried that story yet?

His Wife admits it, credible enough for you?

https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-abrego-garcias-wife-responds-after-restraining-order-revealed-2060718

Yes, this is credible enough. Thanks for posting. However, besmirching Abrego Garcia’s character—just like MagA did George Floyd’s character—does not alter the fact that the Trump administration is defying the SC’s 9-0 ruling to facilitate his return. It’s the principle and precedent that matters here.

DP. And Biden loudly defied the SC's ruling that student loan forgiveness was unconstitutional. Were you outraged about that?
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/06/student-loan-debt-forgiveness-biden

The whataboutism is rich with you guys! Yes, everything about cancelling student loans was a bad idea and poorly executed.

Are you the twit who keeps deflecting to "Trump is a rapist!!"? Because that's some blatant whataboutism that doesn't seem to bother you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder of Van Hollen was aware of the two restraining orders against him for beating his wife before he went on this little excursion.

.

Now it’s up to two, lol? Has a credible news source carried that story yet?

His Wife admits it, credible enough for you?

https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-abrego-garcias-wife-responds-after-restraining-order-revealed-2060718

Yes, this is credible enough. Thanks for posting. However, besmirching Abrego Garcia’s character—just like MagA did George Floyd’s character—does not alter the fact that the Trump administration is defying the SC’s 9-0 ruling to facilitate his return. It’s the principle and precedent that matters here.

DP. And Biden loudly defied the SC's ruling that student loan forgiveness was unconstitutional. Were you outraged about that?
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/06/student-loan-debt-forgiveness-biden

Wait so you are cool with what Biden did or jot? I don’t understand your point other than “Trulpnis ok buy Biden is bad” which is stupid as hell.

Get back to us once you learn to spell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep beating this horse, MAGA

It's very obvious

You can tell they know this is going very badly for them. The propaganda machine has been turned up to 10.

Even the Hill has posted a story saying this case works in Trump’s favor. Open your eyes.

Post the story.

Are you not capable of going over to their website? It’s their lead article.

“His aides have used Abrego Garcia’s deportation to highlight their efforts to remove criminals who entered the country illegally and to frame Democrats as weak on immigration and crime. On Wednesday, they hit Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who traveled to El Salvador in a bid to meet with Abrego Garcia at the notorious prison where he is being held.
“The rule of thumb here is whenever they’re leaning in on immigration they’re winning, or they want to change the message,” said one Trump ally.“

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5252735-trump-administration-refuses-bring-back/

[Anonymous]

Trump's been handing the Democrats the midterms on a silver platter, and the Democrats be all like:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unlawful aliens convicted of domestic violence should not be living here in the USA.

I think it’s him being sent to a brutal prison without a trial that’s a problem. If he just got deported the regular way nobody would care.

That’s the thing - there is a lot Trump could do the usual way. He doesn’t want to. He wants to show us he’s above the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep beating this horse, MAGA

It's very obvious

You can tell they know this is going very badly for them. The propaganda machine has been turned up to 10.

Even the Hill has posted a story saying this case works in Trump’s favor. Open your eyes.

Link? Take your concerns to the Supreme Court. The unanimously found that the government should facilitate his return.

They did not. Release isn’t return.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep beating this horse, MAGA

It's very obvious

You can tell they know this is going very badly for them. The propaganda machine has been turned up to 10.

Even the Hill has posted a story saying this case works in Trump’s favor. Open your eyes.

Post the story.

Are you not capable of going over to their website? It’s their lead article.

“His aides have used Abrego Garcia’s deportation to highlight their efforts to remove criminals who entered the country illegally and to frame Democrats as weak on immigration and crime. On Wednesday, they hit Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who traveled to El Salvador in a bid to meet with Abrego Garcia at the notorious prison where he is being held.
“The rule of thumb here is whenever they’re leaning in on immigration they’re winning, or they want to change the message,” said one Trump ally.“

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5252735-trump-administration-refuses-bring-back/

That’s what I thought - you took one sentence out of the whole article to say the Hill says this works in the administration’s favor. Read the whole article. That’s not what it says.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We still have an American held by Hamas. Why is Van Hollen silent? Don’t tell me it’s because that man isn’t from Maryland because either is Garcia.

He has called on all hostages being released. IOW he isn't being silent.

Let me know when Van Hollen flies out to Gaza.

It's a bit different. There's a war going on in Gaza. There is no war in El Salvador.

The US government illegally sent this man to an El Salvadorian prison. The US government didn't send Americans to Gaza.

And the US government didn’t send an American to El Salvador, but a Salvadoran national.

That Van Hollen is doing a one man rescue mission for an illegal immigrants is LOL dumb.

So you MAGA bots keep telling us. What are your thoughts about the Supreme Court unanimously finding that the government should facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return? They know he’s a Salvadoran national.

Read it again. Facilitate his “release in El Salvador” not return. And chastised the judge saying to consider executive authority/article2 powers.

You should probably post the whole sentence because it does not support you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder of Van Hollen was aware of the two restraining orders against him for beating his wife before he went on this little excursion.

.

Now it’s up to two, lol? Has a credible news source carried that story yet?

His Wife admits it, credible enough for you?

https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-abrego-garcias-wife-responds-after-restraining-order-revealed-2060718

Yes, this is credible enough. Thanks for posting. However, besmirching Abrego Garcia’s character—just like MagA did George Floyd’s character—does not alter the fact that the Trump administration is defying the SC’s 9-0 ruling to facilitate his return. It’s the principle and precedent that matters here.

DP. And Biden loudly defied the SC's ruling that student loan forgiveness was unconstitutional. Were you outraged about that?
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/06/student-loan-debt-forgiveness-biden

Wait so you are cool with what Biden did or jot? I don’t understand your point other than “Trulpnis ok buy Biden is bad” which is stupid as hell.

The Supreme Court in that case ruled Biden could not fund the loan forgiveness program using the HEROS Act. He abided by the decision and did not do so. Instead, he conducted a modified forgiveness program using the SAVE plan.

Nice try, but you failed again.

"The Supreme Court blocked it. But that didn't stop me!"
- Joe Biden

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've known Chris Van Hollen since the mid-90s when I worked with him at the General Assembly. He is the real deal. This is because he cares, and it's not a political stunt. The US government did something horribly wrong and he's trying to fix it.

Then why does this “real deal” democract want to return a known criminal with gang ties and an illegal immigrant to the United States?

What is so “real deal” about that?

Can you please explain this? Because to a normal person in the center, it frankly sounds insane.

+100
Well said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We still have an American held by Hamas. Why is Van Hollen silent? Don’t tell me it’s because that man isn’t from Maryland because either is Garcia.

He has called on all hostages being released. IOW he isn't being silent.

Let me know when Van Hollen flies out to Gaza.

It's a bit different. There's a war going on in Gaza. There is no war in El Salvador.

The US government illegally sent this man to an El Salvadorian prison. The US government didn't send Americans to Gaza.

And the US government didn’t send an American to El Salvador, but a Salvadoran national.

That Van Hollen is doing a one man rescue mission for an illegal immigrants is LOL dumb.

So you MAGA bots keep telling us. What are your thoughts about the Supreme Court unanimously finding that the government should facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return? They know he’s a Salvadoran national.

Read it again. Facilitate his “release in El Salvador” not return. And chastised the judge saying to consider executive authority/article2 powers.

You should probably post the whole sentence because it does not support you.

The word return is no where in the sentence. But of course you knew that when you lied and said it did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've known Chris Van Hollen since the mid-90s when I worked with him at the General Assembly. He is the real deal. This is because he cares, and it's not a political stunt. The US government did something horribly wrong and he's trying to fix it.

Then why does this “real deal” democract want to return a known criminal with gang ties and an illegal immigrant to the United States?

What is so “real deal” about that?

Can you please explain this? Because to a normal person in the center, it frankly sounds insane.

Russian troll.

Yeah ok…..

Humor me then. Explain to this “Russian Troll” why this is a good thing for an American Senator to do? What is to be gained by bringing an illegal alien criminal with known gang affiliation back to the US after he was deported back to his home country?




(And btw, an actual Russian would support what Van Hollen is doing, since it’s harmful to America and Americans, and therefore a positive for Russian)