Prince Harry Wins Case Against Murdoch Group

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the royal family wants him and Meghan back to the UK all the time doing their faux royal tours. Especially not William, whose power is likely growing as his father deteriorates.

Yes. I am surprised people don't acknowledge the fact that Harry slammed the monarchy and specific family members (including present King, Queen, future King and Queen) both in interviews and in writing, for profit. There is no coming back from that. None of this was an essential component of them leaving. If anything, had they not done that, there would be more inclination to justify some sort of special status. He himself described his family as "the firm", and he went against the firm. What exactly did he expect to happen?

+1 another thing people leave out is that in addition to accusing his family of racism (which ultimately led to the naming of Charles and Kate as the ones who discussed Archie’s skin tone) she actually threatened his family in a Cut interview where she said “I didn’t sign an NDA.” Why on earth would they want her or her husband back?

They are completely untrustworthy. Of course they wont be welcome back. The bridge was burned.

Harry is Charles son.

I think it is in everyone’s interests to broker a peace between William and Harry and to reconcile.

I believe that Queen Elizabeth II should have let Harry and Meghan become part time royals.

There probably was some unconscious racism going on in addition the infamous rivalry between William and Harry; but the tell all book and documentary was damaging to both sides.

The royal family is a big deal for both the UK and many commonwealth countries. It is in everyone’s interests for both sides to apologize and reach some kind of mediated agreement.

The royal family has been functioning since harry and Meghan left five years ago. Not sure where the evidence is that they need them or that they have suffered a grave hit from the duo’s allegations. Especially now that US media is echoing the Meghan bullying claims. That only bolsters the firm’s position.

I think the issue is that Harry is unhappy in California and despite calling his move to the US “freedom,” is miserable. US media is now calling him a fool and writing about his idea to interview Putin and trump about why they are sociopaths. I think his legitimate hate for the media and palace officials blinded him to the fact that by pushing the “Harry is a part boy” image, they were protecting him from a public image that is even more damning: he is dumb.

There is a big difference between functioning and flourishing. Their popularity has dropped and their impact on tourism while still enormous has dropped considerably.

The popularity of the British royal family has declined since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's announcement to leave Britain in 2020. The couple's popularity has plummeted, and their negative press coverage has contributed to the decline in support for the monarchy.

In addition to the revelations made in Prince Harry's memoir, Spare; Prince Andrew’s association with Epstein and the sexual assault of minor allegations that were settled out of court also hurt the monarchy,


The future of the monarchy depends on King Charles's ability to persuade Britons of the institution's value.

Part of that value is adapting to modern society which is much less white than it was.

The public seeing Charles able to rebuild a relationship with his youngest son and his family will help More than hurt.

Harry was very popular in many of the charities he represented. It was foolish of the firm to not let him continue part time and to cut off all his funding and security protection.

I believe that king Charles III should seek professional mediation and commit to healing the wounds. There is fault to be found on both sides. It is in everyone’s interest to seek reconciliation.

Hardliners who advocated shutting them out of the firm when they sought to be part time royals probably thought they were defending the royal institution while I believe they harmed it by not adapting to modern realities.
Further, many commonwealth countries are predominantly POC and reconciliation with Meghan would be welcomed by many of them.

Most of all Charles should seek reconciliation so he can have regular contact with his grandchildren as well as son.

Nice fantasy but the damage is done. This wasn't a minor disagreement they went scorched earth with the book and Oprah shows. That's not family you can trust in the family business and they aren't just going to turn over the Commonwealth to Meghan. She knows next to nothing about diplomacy and can't get along with her family.

You don’t seem to understand that royal authority is symbolic and their legitimacy requires a lot of good will and faith in their value to society.

It would not be a matter of handing over the keys to the kingdom to Meghan but finding common ground and unity in a polarized world. Being unifiers while rooted in culture and history would have enormous value to society.

I understand it perfectly well. But, here we are. The palace doesn't agree with you. And Brits aren't exactly crying their eyes out hoping for Meghan's return. She's an American, not one of them.

It’s about restoring Harry and unifying the royal family rather than primarily about Meghan.

The British monarch is technically head of state for 15 countries in the Commonwealth realm and Charles is the head of the Chirch of England / worldwide Anglican communion .

Further, King Charles III is the head of the Church of England and the worldwide Anglican Communion that includes the US Episcopal church. He is the supreme governor of the Church of England.

King Charles has both a familial and religious duty to seek reconciliation with his younger son. It will benefit public perception of the royal family if King Charles mends fences with Meghan. UK is extremely multicultural and the broader commonwealth is even more so.

There was wrong doing on both sides and I hope King Charles will seek professional mediation and reconciliation. It would represent a win win.

[Anonymous]

William's kids are almost teens, they don't need a back up heir.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the royal family wants him and Meghan back to the UK all the time doing their faux royal tours. Especially not William, whose power is likely growing as his father deteriorates.

Yes. I am surprised people don't acknowledge the fact that Harry slammed the monarchy and specific family members (including present King, Queen, future King and Queen) both in interviews and in writing, for profit. There is no coming back from that. None of this was an essential component of them leaving. If anything, had they not done that, there would be more inclination to justify some sort of special status. He himself described his family as "the firm", and he went against the firm. What exactly did he expect to happen?

+1 another thing people leave out is that in addition to accusing his family of racism (which ultimately led to the naming of Charles and Kate as the ones who discussed Archie’s skin tone) she actually threatened his family in a Cut interview where she said “I didn’t sign an NDA.” Why on earth would they want her or her husband back?

They are completely untrustworthy. Of course they wont be welcome back. The bridge was burned.

Harry is Charles son.

I think it is in everyone’s interests to broker a peace between William and Harry and to reconcile.

I believe that Queen Elizabeth II should have let Harry and Meghan become part time royals.

There probably was some unconscious racism going on in addition the infamous rivalry between William and Harry; but the tell all book and documentary was damaging to both sides.

The royal family is a big deal for both the UK and many commonwealth countries. It is in everyone’s interests for both sides to apologize and reach some kind of mediated agreement.

The royal family has been functioning since harry and Meghan left five years ago. Not sure where the evidence is that they need them or that they have suffered a grave hit from the duo’s allegations. Especially now that US media is echoing the Meghan bullying claims. That only bolsters the firm’s position.

I think the issue is that Harry is unhappy in California and despite calling his move to the US “freedom,” is miserable. US media is now calling him a fool and writing about his idea to interview Putin and trump about why they are sociopaths. I think his legitimate hate for the media and palace officials blinded him to the fact that by pushing the “Harry is a part boy” image, they were protecting him from a public image that is even more damning: he is dumb.

There is a big difference between functioning and flourishing. Their popularity has dropped and their impact on tourism while still enormous has dropped considerably.

The popularity of the British royal family has declined since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's announcement to leave Britain in 2020. The couple's popularity has plummeted, and their negative press coverage has contributed to the decline in support for the monarchy.

In addition to the revelations made in Prince Harry's memoir, Spare; Prince Andrew’s association with Epstein and the sexual assault of minor allegations that were settled out of court also hurt the monarchy,


The future of the monarchy depends on King Charles's ability to persuade Britons of the institution's value.

Part of that value is adapting to modern society which is much less white than it was.

The public seeing Charles able to rebuild a relationship with his youngest son and his family will help More than hurt.

Harry was very popular in many of the charities he represented. It was foolish of the firm to not let him continue part time and to cut off all his funding and security protection.

I believe that king Charles III should seek professional mediation and commit to healing the wounds. There is fault to be found on both sides. It is in everyone’s interest to seek reconciliation.

Hardliners who advocated shutting them out of the firm when they sought to be part time royals probably thought they were defending the royal institution while I believe they harmed it by not adapting to modern realities.
Further, many commonwealth countries are predominantly POC and reconciliation with Meghan would be welcomed by many of them.

Most of all Charles should seek reconciliation so he can have regular contact with his grandchildren as well as son.

Nice fantasy but the damage is done. This wasn't a minor disagreement they went scorched earth with the book and Oprah shows. That's not family you can trust in the family business and they aren't just going to turn over the Commonwealth to Meghan. She knows next to nothing about diplomacy and can't get along with her family.

You don’t seem to understand that royal authority is symbolic and their legitimacy requires a lot of good will and faith in their value to society.

It would not be a matter of handing over the keys to the kingdom to Meghan but finding common ground and unity in a polarized world. Being unifiers while rooted in culture and history would have enormous value to society.

I understand it perfectly well. But, here we are. The palace doesn't agree with you. And Brits aren't exactly crying their eyes out hoping for Meghan's return. She's an American, not one of them.

It’s about restoring Harry and unifying the royal family rather than primarily about Meghan.

The British monarch is technically head of state for 15 countries in the Commonwealth realm and Charles is the head of the Chirch of England / worldwide Anglican communion .

Further, King Charles III is the head of the Church of England and the worldwide Anglican Communion that includes the US Episcopal church. He is the supreme governor of the Church of England.

King Charles has both a familial and religious duty to seek reconciliation with his younger son. It will benefit public perception of the royal family if King Charles mends fences with Meghan. UK is extremely multicultural and the broader commonwealth is even more so.

There was wrong doing on both sides and I hope King Charles will seek professional mediation and reconciliation. It would represent a win win.

Wrongdoing on Harrys side. Hes an immature untrustworthy person. Charles may love him as a son but Harry crossed lines that you can't uncross. And sorry, I dont buy the story that the palace fed the royal rota a bunch of lies because they were jealous. Jealous of what? That story sounds like something Megan would make up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the royal family wants him and Meghan back to the UK all the time doing their faux royal tours. Especially not William, whose power is likely growing as his father deteriorates.

Yes. I am surprised people don't acknowledge the fact that Harry slammed the monarchy and specific family members (including present King, Queen, future King and Queen) both in interviews and in writing, for profit. There is no coming back from that. None of this was an essential component of them leaving. If anything, had they not done that, there would be more inclination to justify some sort of special status. He himself described his family as "the firm", and he went against the firm. What exactly did he expect to happen?

+1 another thing people leave out is that in addition to accusing his family of racism (which ultimately led to the naming of Charles and Kate as the ones who discussed Archie’s skin tone) she actually threatened his family in a Cut interview where she said “I didn’t sign an NDA.” Why on earth would they want her or her husband back?

They are completely untrustworthy. Of course they wont be welcome back. The bridge was burned.

Harry is Charles son.

I think it is in everyone’s interests to broker a peace between William and Harry and to reconcile.

I believe that Queen Elizabeth II should have let Harry and Meghan become part time royals.

There probably was some unconscious racism going on in addition the infamous rivalry between William and Harry; but the tell all book and documentary was damaging to both sides.

The royal family is a big deal for both the UK and many commonwealth countries. It is in everyone’s interests for both sides to apologize and reach some kind of mediated agreement.

The royal family has been functioning since harry and Meghan left five years ago. Not sure where the evidence is that they need them or that they have suffered a grave hit from the duo’s allegations. Especially now that US media is echoing the Meghan bullying claims. That only bolsters the firm’s position.

I think the issue is that Harry is unhappy in California and despite calling his move to the US “freedom,” is miserable. US media is now calling him a fool and writing about his idea to interview Putin and trump about why they are sociopaths. I think his legitimate hate for the media and palace officials blinded him to the fact that by pushing the “Harry is a part boy” image, they were protecting him from a public image that is even more damning: he is dumb.

There is a big difference between functioning and flourishing. Their popularity has dropped and their impact on tourism while still enormous has dropped considerably.

The popularity of the British royal family has declined since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's announcement to leave Britain in 2020. The couple's popularity has plummeted, and their negative press coverage has contributed to the decline in support for the monarchy.

In addition to the revelations made in Prince Harry's memoir, Spare; Prince Andrew’s association with Epstein and the sexual assault of minor allegations that were settled out of court also hurt the monarchy,


The future of the monarchy depends on King Charles's ability to persuade Britons of the institution's value.

Part of that value is adapting to modern society which is much less white than it was.

The public seeing Charles able to rebuild a relationship with his youngest son and his family will help More than hurt.

Harry was very popular in many of the charities he represented. It was foolish of the firm to not let him continue part time and to cut off all his funding and security protection.

I believe that king Charles III should seek professional mediation and commit to healing the wounds. There is fault to be found on both sides. It is in everyone’s interest to seek reconciliation.

Hardliners who advocated shutting them out of the firm when they sought to be part time royals probably thought they were defending the royal institution while I believe they harmed it by not adapting to modern realities.
Further, many commonwealth countries are predominantly POC and reconciliation with Meghan would be welcomed by many of them.

Most of all Charles should seek reconciliation so he can have regular contact with his grandchildren as well as son.

Nice fantasy but the damage is done. This wasn't a minor disagreement they went scorched earth with the book and Oprah shows. That's not family you can trust in the family business and they aren't just going to turn over the Commonwealth to Meghan. She knows next to nothing about diplomacy and can't get along with her family.

You don’t seem to understand that royal authority is symbolic and their legitimacy requires a lot of good will and faith in their value to society.

It would not be a matter of handing over the keys to the kingdom to Meghan but finding common ground and unity in a polarized world. Being unifiers while rooted in culture and history would have enormous value to society.

I understand it perfectly well. But, here we are. The palace doesn't agree with you. And Brits aren't exactly crying their eyes out hoping for Meghan's return. She's an American, not one of them.

It’s about restoring Harry and unifying the royal family rather than primarily about Meghan.

The British monarch is technically head of state for 15 countries in the Commonwealth realm and Charles is the head of the Chirch of England / worldwide Anglican communion .

Further, King Charles III is the head of the Church of England and the worldwide Anglican Communion that includes the US Episcopal church. He is the supreme governor of the Church of England.

King Charles has both a familial and religious duty to seek reconciliation with his younger son. It will benefit public perception of the royal family if King Charles mends fences with Meghan. UK is extremely multicultural and the broader commonwealth is even more so.

There was wrong doing on both sides and I hope King Charles will seek professional mediation and reconciliation. It would represent a win win.

Thanks for the history lesson but I have lived in England. The people don’t miss Harry or Meghan. if the prodigal son wants to return be should do a giant apology tour and eat some crow first. I am sure Orpah would be a good place to start.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the royal family wants him and Meghan back to the UK all the time doing their faux royal tours. Especially not William, whose power is likely growing as his father deteriorates.

Yes. I am surprised people don't acknowledge the fact that Harry slammed the monarchy and specific family members (including present King, Queen, future King and Queen) both in interviews and in writing, for profit. There is no coming back from that. None of this was an essential component of them leaving. If anything, had they not done that, there would be more inclination to justify some sort of special status. He himself described his family as "the firm", and he went against the firm. What exactly did he expect to happen?

+1 another thing people leave out is that in addition to accusing his family of racism (which ultimately led to the naming of Charles and Kate as the ones who discussed Archie’s skin tone) she actually threatened his family in a Cut interview where she said “I didn’t sign an NDA.” Why on earth would they want her or her husband back?

They are completely untrustworthy. Of course they wont be welcome back. The bridge was burned.

Harry is Charles son.

I think it is in everyone’s interests to broker a peace between William and Harry and to reconcile.

I believe that Queen Elizabeth II should have let Harry and Meghan become part time royals.

There probably was some unconscious racism going on in addition the infamous rivalry between William and Harry; but the tell all book and documentary was damaging to both sides.

The royal family is a big deal for both the UK and many commonwealth countries. It is in everyone’s interests for both sides to apologize and reach some kind of mediated agreement.

The royal family has been functioning since harry and Meghan left five years ago. Not sure where the evidence is that they need them or that they have suffered a grave hit from the duo’s allegations. Especially now that US media is echoing the Meghan bullying claims. That only bolsters the firm’s position.

I think the issue is that Harry is unhappy in California and despite calling his move to the US “freedom,” is miserable. US media is now calling him a fool and writing about his idea to interview Putin and trump about why they are sociopaths. I think his legitimate hate for the media and palace officials blinded him to the fact that by pushing the “Harry is a part boy” image, they were protecting him from a public image that is even more damning: he is dumb.

There is a big difference between functioning and flourishing. Their popularity has dropped and their impact on tourism while still enormous has dropped considerably.

The popularity of the British royal family has declined since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's announcement to leave Britain in 2020. The couple's popularity has plummeted, and their negative press coverage has contributed to the decline in support for the monarchy.

In addition to the revelations made in Prince Harry's memoir, Spare; Prince Andrew’s association with Epstein and the sexual assault of minor allegations that were settled out of court also hurt the monarchy,


The future of the monarchy depends on King Charles's ability to persuade Britons of the institution's value.

Part of that value is adapting to modern society which is much less white than it was.

The public seeing Charles able to rebuild a relationship with his youngest son and his family will help More than hurt.

Harry was very popular in many of the charities he represented. It was foolish of the firm to not let him continue part time and to cut off all his funding and security protection.

I believe that king Charles III should seek professional mediation and commit to healing the wounds. There is fault to be found on both sides. It is in everyone’s interest to seek reconciliation.

Hardliners who advocated shutting them out of the firm when they sought to be part time royals probably thought they were defending the royal institution while I believe they harmed it by not adapting to modern realities.
Further, many commonwealth countries are predominantly POC and reconciliation with Meghan would be welcomed by many of them.

Most of all Charles should seek reconciliation so he can have regular contact with his grandchildren as well as son.

Nice fantasy but the damage is done. This wasn't a minor disagreement they went scorched earth with the book and Oprah shows. That's not family you can trust in the family business and they aren't just going to turn over the Commonwealth to Meghan. She knows next to nothing about diplomacy and can't get along with her family.

You don’t seem to understand that royal authority is symbolic and their legitimacy requires a lot of good will and faith in their value to society.

It would not be a matter of handing over the keys to the kingdom to Meghan but finding common ground and unity in a polarized world. Being unifiers while rooted in culture and history would have enormous value to society.

I understand it perfectly well. But, here we are. The palace doesn't agree with you. And Brits aren't exactly crying their eyes out hoping for Meghan's return. She's an American, not one of them.

It’s about restoring Harry and unifying the royal family rather than primarily about Meghan.

The British monarch is technically head of state for 15 countries in the Commonwealth realm and Charles is the head of the Chirch of England / worldwide Anglican communion .

Further, King Charles III is the head of the Church of England and the worldwide Anglican Communion that includes the US Episcopal church. He is the supreme governor of the Church of England.

King Charles has both a familial and religious duty to seek reconciliation with his younger son. It will benefit public perception of the royal family if King Charles mends fences with Meghan. UK is extremely multicultural and the broader commonwealth is even more so.

There was wrong doing on both sides and I hope King Charles will seek professional mediation and reconciliation. It would represent a win win.

Wrongdoing on Harrys side. Hes an immature untrustworthy person. Charles may love him as a son but Harry crossed lines that you can't uncross. And sorry, I dont buy the story that the palace fed the royal rota a bunch of lies because they were jealous. Jealous of what? That story sounds like something Megan would make up.

+ 1. It seems the RF is fine despite aging and having serious health impacts. Polling shows Harry and Meghan aren’t missed or welcome, and their kids are irrelevant to everyone but their families. They left, and don’t seem to be missed - even by Charles, and no one can blame him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:William's kids are almost teens, they don't need a back up heir.

It’s this. Harry let his rage and short-sightedness lead him to some silly moves. I assume it felt great to him to attack his family so hope it was worth it! He’s out forever. The press will be covering the Wales family obsessively for the next 60 years, you know, while ARO seeks to soft launch, part II.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William's kids are almost teens, they don't need a back up heir.

It’s this. Harry let his rage and short-sightedness lead him to some silly moves. I assume it felt great to him to attack his family so hope it was worth it! He’s out forever. The press will be covering the Wales family obsessively for the next 60 years, you know, while ARO seeks to soft launch, part II.

That’s the thing, he’s out forever, and they basically said nothing about him while he trashed them and painted them as terrible. He’ll never be back in unless there is a mental break down, divorce and huge mea culpa on his part. I agree Meghan was sometimes popular in the media, sometimes unpopular, and treated with racists undertones on occasion, but this came down to money and power. They thought that could walk into billions by slapping Sussex on bed sheets and a chip and Joanna Gaines like line at target, be embraced by the Hollywood elites and just have all the power, money and stardom anyone could want. Now they are huge failures at everything aside from trashing the family, seem to be scrambling for money, are not invited anywhere A list and have been dumped by the celebrity crowd, and have credibly been labeled bullies by vanity fair and grifters with no work ethic by execs all while having to pay a massive mortgage, reportedly 1mm per year for security alone, staff etc. I bet that 3mm and free housing, security, schooling for kids, high profile events, luxury dress and travel etc doesn’t look so bad now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William's kids are almost teens, they don't need a back up heir.

It’s this. Harry let his rage and short-sightedness lead him to some silly moves. I assume it felt great to him to attack his family so hope it was worth it! He’s out forever. The press will be covering the Wales family obsessively for the next 60 years, you know, while ARO seeks to soft launch, part II.

True. He won’t be the son of a king for long then he will just be the brother and the brothers don’t get along. His royal importance has an expiration date on it that’s coming up fast. He will be like Andrew or Edward but estranged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the royal family wants him and Meghan back to the UK all the time doing their faux royal tours. Especially not William, whose power is likely growing as his father deteriorates.

Yes. I am surprised people don't acknowledge the fact that Harry slammed the monarchy and specific family members (including present King, Queen, future King and Queen) both in interviews and in writing, for profit. There is no coming back from that. None of this was an essential component of them leaving. If anything, had they not done that, there would be more inclination to justify some sort of special status. He himself described his family as "the firm", and he went against the firm. What exactly did he expect to happen?

+1 another thing people leave out is that in addition to accusing his family of racism (which ultimately led to the naming of Charles and Kate as the ones who discussed Archie’s skin tone) she actually threatened his family in a Cut interview where she said “I didn’t sign an NDA.” Why on earth would they want her or her husband back?

The truth is threatening? They have some money now plus her royalties. I wouldn’t worry about that family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the royal family wants him and Meghan back to the UK all the time doing their faux royal tours. Especially not William, whose power is likely growing as his father deteriorates.

Yes. I am surprised people don't acknowledge the fact that Harry slammed the monarchy and specific family members (including present King, Queen, future King and Queen) both in interviews and in writing, for profit. There is no coming back from that. None of this was an essential component of them leaving. If anything, had they not done that, there would be more inclination to justify some sort of special status. He himself described his family as "the firm", and he went against the firm. What exactly did he expect to happen?

+1 another thing people leave out is that in addition to accusing his family of racism (which ultimately led to the naming of Charles and Kate as the ones who discussed Archie’s skin tone) she actually threatened his family in a Cut interview where she said “I didn’t sign an NDA.” Why on earth would they want her or her husband back?

The truth is threatening? They have some money now plus her royalties. I wouldn’t worry about that family.

It’s one of those fake lived truths though. But nobody owes Harry a reconciliation after the way he left scorched earth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the royal family wants him and Meghan back to the UK all the time doing their faux royal tours. Especially not William, whose power is likely growing as his father deteriorates.

Yes. I am surprised people don't acknowledge the fact that Harry slammed the monarchy and specific family members (including present King, Queen, future King and Queen) both in interviews and in writing, for profit. There is no coming back from that. None of this was an essential component of them leaving. If anything, had they not done that, there would be more inclination to justify some sort of special status. He himself described his family as "the firm", and he went against the firm. What exactly did he expect to happen?

+1 another thing people leave out is that in addition to accusing his family of racism (which ultimately led to the naming of Charles and Kate as the ones who discussed Archie’s skin tone) she actually threatened his family in a Cut interview where she said “I didn’t sign an NDA.” Why on earth would they want her or her husband back?

They are completely untrustworthy. Of course they wont be welcome back. The bridge was burned.

Harry is Charles son.

I think it is in everyone’s interests to broker a peace between William and Harry and to reconcile.

I believe that Queen Elizabeth II should have let Harry and Meghan become part time royals.

There probably was some unconscious racism going on in addition the infamous rivalry between William and Harry; but the tell all book and documentary was damaging to both sides.

The royal family is a big deal for both the UK and many commonwealth countries. It is in everyone’s interests for both sides to apologize and reach some kind of mediated agreement.

The royal family has been functioning since harry and Meghan left five years ago. Not sure where the evidence is that they need them or that they have suffered a grave hit from the duo’s allegations. Especially now that US media is echoing the Meghan bullying claims. That only bolsters the firm’s position.

I think the issue is that Harry is unhappy in California and despite calling his move to the US “freedom,” is miserable. US media is now calling him a fool and writing about his idea to interview Putin and trump about why they are sociopaths. I think his legitimate hate for the media and palace officials blinded him to the fact that by pushing the “Harry is a part boy” image, they were protecting him from a public image that is even more damning: he is dumb.

Barely. Half of them are dying. And the whole last year they spent mismanaging the media circus around fake photos. A mess. The Queen is looking down in agony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the royal family wants him and Meghan back to the UK all the time doing their faux royal tours. Especially not William, whose power is likely growing as his father deteriorates.

Yes. I am surprised people don't acknowledge the fact that Harry slammed the monarchy and specific family members (including present King, Queen, future King and Queen) both in interviews and in writing, for profit. There is no coming back from that. None of this was an essential component of them leaving. If anything, had they not done that, there would be more inclination to justify some sort of special status. He himself described his family as "the firm", and he went against the firm. What exactly did he expect to happen?

+1 another thing people leave out is that in addition to accusing his family of racism (which ultimately led to the naming of Charles and Kate as the ones who discussed Archie’s skin tone) she actually threatened his family in a Cut interview where she said “I didn’t sign an NDA.” Why on earth would they want her or her husband back?

They are completely untrustworthy. Of course they wont be welcome back. The bridge was burned.

Harry is Charles son.

I think it is in everyone’s interests to broker a peace between William and Harry and to reconcile.

I believe that Queen Elizabeth II should have let Harry and Meghan become part time royals.

There probably was some unconscious racism going on in addition the infamous rivalry between William and Harry; but the tell all book and documentary was damaging to both sides.

The royal family is a big deal for both the UK and many commonwealth countries. It is in everyone’s interests for both sides to apologize and reach some kind of mediated agreement.

The royal family has been functioning since harry and Meghan left five years ago. Not sure where the evidence is that they need them or that they have suffered a grave hit from the duo’s allegations. Especially now that US media is echoing the Meghan bullying claims. That only bolsters the firm’s position.

I think the issue is that Harry is unhappy in California and despite calling his move to the US “freedom,” is miserable. US media is now calling him a fool and writing about his idea to interview Putin and trump about why they are sociopaths. I think his legitimate hate for the media and palace officials blinded him to the fact that by pushing the “Harry is a part boy” image, they were protecting him from a public image that is even more damning: he is dumb.

There is a big difference between functioning and flourishing. Their popularity has dropped and their impact on tourism while still enormous has dropped considerably.

The popularity of the British royal family has declined since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's announcement to leave Britain in 2020. The couple's popularity has plummeted, and their negative press coverage has contributed to the decline in support for the monarchy.

In addition to the revelations made in Prince Harry's memoir, Spare; Prince Andrew’s association with Epstein and the sexual assault of minor allegations that were settled out of court also hurt the monarchy,


The future of the monarchy depends on King Charles's ability to persuade Britons of the institution's value.

Part of that value is adapting to modern society which is much less white than it was.

The public seeing Charles able to rebuild a relationship with his youngest son and his family will help More than hurt.

Harry was very popular in many of the charities he represented. It was foolish of the firm to not let him continue part time and to cut off all his funding and security protection.

I believe that king Charles III should seek professional mediation and commit to healing the wounds. There is fault to be found on both sides. It is in everyone’s interest to seek reconciliation.

Hardliners who advocated shutting them out of the firm when they sought to be part time royals probably thought they were defending the royal institution while I believe they harmed it by not adapting to modern realities.
Further, many commonwealth countries are predominantly POC and reconciliation with Meghan would be welcomed by many of them.

Most of all Charles should seek reconciliation so he can have regular contact with his grandchildren as well as son.

+1 They’re about to lose the country to Pakistan anyway. The monarchy is in its last days

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does Harry even want to go back?

no. it would be too much work. he wants to chill, make tons of money and show up to invictus.

lol that’s literally what he asked for

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the royal family wants him and Meghan back to the UK all the time doing their faux royal tours. Especially not William, whose power is likely growing as his father deteriorates.

Yes. I am surprised people don't acknowledge the fact that Harry slammed the monarchy and specific family members (including present King, Queen, future King and Queen) both in interviews and in writing, for profit. There is no coming back from that. None of this was an essential component of them leaving. If anything, had they not done that, there would be more inclination to justify some sort of special status. He himself described his family as "the firm", and he went against the firm. What exactly did he expect to happen?

+1 another thing people leave out is that in addition to accusing his family of racism (which ultimately led to the naming of Charles and Kate as the ones who discussed Archie’s skin tone) she actually threatened his family in a Cut interview where she said “I didn’t sign an NDA.” Why on earth would they want her or her husband back?

They are completely untrustworthy. Of course they wont be welcome back. The bridge was burned.

Harry is Charles son.

I think it is in everyone’s interests to broker a peace between William and Harry and to reconcile.

I believe that Queen Elizabeth II should have let Harry and Meghan become part time royals.

There probably was some unconscious racism going on in addition the infamous rivalry between William and Harry; but the tell all book and documentary was damaging to both sides.

The royal family is a big deal for both the UK and many commonwealth countries. It is in everyone’s interests for both sides to apologize and reach some kind of mediated agreement.

The royal family has been functioning since harry and Meghan left five years ago. Not sure where the evidence is that they need them or that they have suffered a grave hit from the duo’s allegations. Especially now that US media is echoing the Meghan bullying claims. That only bolsters the firm’s position.

I think the issue is that Harry is unhappy in California and despite calling his move to the US “freedom,” is miserable. US media is now calling him a fool and writing about his idea to interview Putin and trump about why they are sociopaths. I think his legitimate hate for the media and palace officials blinded him to the fact that by pushing the “Harry is a part boy” image, they were protecting him from a public image that is even more damning: he is dumb.

There is a big difference between functioning and flourishing. Their popularity has dropped and their impact on tourism while still enormous has dropped considerably.

The popularity of the British royal family has declined since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's announcement to leave Britain in 2020. The couple's popularity has plummeted, and their negative press coverage has contributed to the decline in support for the monarchy.

In addition to the revelations made in Prince Harry's memoir, Spare; Prince Andrew’s association with Epstein and the sexual assault of minor allegations that were settled out of court also hurt the monarchy,


The future of the monarchy depends on King Charles's ability to persuade Britons of the institution's value.

Part of that value is adapting to modern society which is much less white than it was.

The public seeing Charles able to rebuild a relationship with his youngest son and his family will help More than hurt.

Harry was very popular in many of the charities he represented. It was foolish of the firm to not let him continue part time and to cut off all his funding and security protection.

I believe that king Charles III should seek professional mediation and commit to healing the wounds. There is fault to be found on both sides. It is in everyone’s interest to seek reconciliation.

Hardliners who advocated shutting them out of the firm when they sought to be part time royals probably thought they were defending the royal institution while I believe they harmed it by not adapting to modern realities.
Further, many commonwealth countries are predominantly POC and reconciliation with Meghan would be welcomed by many of them.

Most of all Charles should seek reconciliation so he can have regular contact with his grandchildren as well as son.

+1 They’re about to lose the country to Pakistan anyway. The monarchy is in its last days

Maybe… I don’t thinks that’s true entirely, but I think there will be an exit of commonwealth countries over the next decade. Regardless, they are still billionaires and will live in castles and have the jewels. They just won’t have to do those pesky world tours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the royal family wants him and Meghan back to the UK all the time doing their faux royal tours. Especially not William, whose power is likely growing as his father deteriorates.

Yes. I am surprised people don't acknowledge the fact that Harry slammed the monarchy and specific family members (including present King, Queen, future King and Queen) both in interviews and in writing, for profit. There is no coming back from that. None of this was an essential component of them leaving. If anything, had they not done that, there would be more inclination to justify some sort of special status. He himself described his family as "the firm", and he went against the firm. What exactly did he expect to happen?

+1 another thing people leave out is that in addition to accusing his family of racism (which ultimately led to the naming of Charles and Kate as the ones who discussed Archie’s skin tone) she actually threatened his family in a Cut interview where she said “I didn’t sign an NDA.” Why on earth would they want her or her husband back?

They are completely untrustworthy. Of course they wont be welcome back. The bridge was burned.

Harry is Charles son.

I think it is in everyone’s interests to broker a peace between William and Harry and to reconcile.

I believe that Queen Elizabeth II should have let Harry and Meghan become part time royals.

There probably was some unconscious racism going on in addition the infamous rivalry between William and Harry; but the tell all book and documentary was damaging to both sides.

The royal family is a big deal for both the UK and many commonwealth countries. It is in everyone’s interests for both sides to apologize and reach some kind of mediated agreement.

The royal family has been functioning since harry and Meghan left five years ago. Not sure where the evidence is that they need them or that they have suffered a grave hit from the duo’s allegations. Especially now that US media is echoing the Meghan bullying claims. That only bolsters the firm’s position.

I think the issue is that Harry is unhappy in California and despite calling his move to the US “freedom,” is miserable. US media is now calling him a fool and writing about his idea to interview Putin and trump about why they are sociopaths. I think his legitimate hate for the media and palace officials blinded him to the fact that by pushing the “Harry is a part boy” image, they were protecting him from a public image that is even more damning: he is dumb.

There is a big difference between functioning and flourishing. Their popularity has dropped and their impact on tourism while still enormous has dropped considerably.

The popularity of the British royal family has declined since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's announcement to leave Britain in 2020. The couple's popularity has plummeted, and their negative press coverage has contributed to the decline in support for the monarchy.

In addition to the revelations made in Prince Harry's memoir, Spare; Prince Andrew’s association with Epstein and the sexual assault of minor allegations that were settled out of court also hurt the monarchy,


The future of the monarchy depends on King Charles's ability to persuade Britons of the institution's value.

Part of that value is adapting to modern society which is much less white than it was.

The public seeing Charles able to rebuild a relationship with his youngest son and his family will help More than hurt.

Harry was very popular in many of the charities he represented. It was foolish of the firm to not let him continue part time and to cut off all his funding and security protection.

I believe that king Charles III should seek professional mediation and commit to healing the wounds. There is fault to be found on both sides. It is in everyone’s interest to seek reconciliation.

Hardliners who advocated shutting them out of the firm when they sought to be part time royals probably thought they were defending the royal institution while I believe they harmed it by not adapting to modern realities.
Further, many commonwealth countries are predominantly POC and reconciliation with Meghan would be welcomed by many of them.

Most of all Charles should seek reconciliation so he can have regular contact with his grandchildren as well as son.

Nice fantasy but the damage is done. This wasn't a minor disagreement they went scorched earth with the book and Oprah shows. That's not family you can trust in the family business and they aren't just going to turn over the Commonwealth to Meghan. She knows next to nothing about diplomacy and can't get along with her family.

You don’t seem to understand that royal authority is symbolic and their legitimacy requires a lot of good will and faith in their value to society.

It would not be a matter of handing over the keys to the kingdom to Meghan but finding common ground and unity in a polarized world. Being unifiers while rooted in culture and history would have enormous value to society.

This might have happened in time, if Meghan and Harry stayed. But they didn't, they opted out.

They were chased out

They were given tours of various Pacific and African country. That last tour was right before the exited. So how were they chased out? They had public functions and duties.

As Meghan said, they disrespected her unborn child. She doesn’t put up with nonsense like that from her own family nevertheless some new family. Money or not. And I love her for that.