So many great points but some people don’t like to think about how complex these things are and think everything is simpler than it is. |
This. |
Which is also why we contract out our unethical practices to China. |
And the answer to that problem is not to shut down conversation. It's to educate people to be skeptical and think critically. |
Dp- oh and what a nuanced conversation the “China virus” crew was having! So constructive and thoughtful! |
|
If the virus would have came from Russia there would be no liberal outcries of “don’t blame it on Russia and call it the Russia Virus because it might fuel anti Slavic hatred.”
Unless you’re living in delusion you know this would have been the case. Why are we caring more about the China, which is also our enemy? |
Completely debunked by the Broad Scientist in the linked article. Epidemiological data are extremely weak supporting the wet market idea. Epidemiological data are strong supporting the lab leak hypothesis. It's almost as if you read zero of the article, backed by tons of scientific facts, that was written by a scientist working at one of the most prestigious intuitions in the entire country. |
By using common damn sense!! If you read the article, China was conducting gain of function research on the covid virus in a friggin BSL2 lab!!!! That's completely unacceptable risk for the entire world! It's mind boggling you people think China should be off the hook Scot free for conducting this kind of high risk research while having gross incompetence for safety and disregarding virtually all international standards for safety. If you read the actual article, the American scientist with ties to the research at the Wuhan lab knew it was being conducted under BSL2 and even explicitly stated that if American scientists found out that kind of research was being conducted in China under such lax safety oversight they would have lost their sh*t. Why is it so hard to ask countries like China to obey international standards for every for this kind of research so they they don't kill millions of people yet again? |
Educated people “get” nuance. And the south and rural areas (Trump bastion) underfund education. In part because they don’t see the value of contributing to the tax base. They also treat real science the same is dogma (ie, creationism). So, you get the voting patterns one sees in our country. |
Cool. China sucks. We all know that. We all knew it then. We also knew it came from China. Screeching about a lab leak did F all to help Americans in spring 2020. In fact it was a distraction and hindrance to where our focus needed to be. Testing, tracing, and treating. We were failing at all of the above and the White House wanted to pull focus away from their failures. |
The time to extract resources from China for all the testing, tracing, and treating was then. |
+1 Trump always sucks all of the oxygen out of the room with his self-created drama. Instead of focusing on actually addressing covid he was busy stoking racism and all other sorts of distractions. Pure chaos. At the very beginning of covid, I actually thought he could easily step in and bring our country together during a major crisis. Like Bush during 9/11. I was annoyed because I thought he’d ride that easy win right into a second term. But no. He couldn’t even do the very basic acts of leadership. It was so much worse than I expected. |
1. no one said China should go scott free 2. How are you going to enforce China obey international laws? We don't even obey all international laws. 3. Why did Trump defund the pandemic response team, and that included the scientists whose boots were on the ground in China at the time. You want small government? That's what you got. |
So, then Trump shouldn't have defunded the scientists who were there who could've gotten the samples out. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN21C3NE/
|
Racist much? We get what you mean by lack of education in the south. |