Reply to Crazy NYT article on the lab leak theory for COVID

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Crazy NYT article on the lab leak theory for COVID"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The epidemiological evidence for origins at the wet market is strong, with vendors and delivery people who worked there among the earliest cases admitted to hospitals. The majority of the early cases had direct links to the market, and the transmissibility of the virus was such that early cases not identified as linked to the market very well could have been, similar to one person who became infected who had been visited by a friend who did work at the market, even though that patient had not been to the market himself.

Plus there is no epidemiological evidence AFAIK for the virus originating from the lab. 
As for the intelligence community, only 1 agency (not identified in their unclassified report) reported "with low confidence" that there was a lab origin.

Good article by a scientist written for general readership: https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-03-08/covid-lab-leak-energy-department-fbi[/quote]

Completely debunked by the Broad Scientist in the linked article. Epidemiological data are extremely weak supporting the wet market idea.  Epidemiological data are strong supporting the lab leak hypothesis. It's almost as if you read zero of the article, backed by tons of scientific facts, that was written by a scientist working at one of the most prestigious intuitions in the entire country. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics