McLean should back out

[Anonymous]

I think the subject line of this is exactly right, even more so now that this has devolved. You cannot rush something this complicated. Back out and ask ECNL for a year to cobble this alliance together.

Come at us, ECNL!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would be shocked if MV got teams and 1 if anything...either he is an awful coach or he never had the players at BRAVE that allowed him to play his style

MV is getting the 2008G

AND 2010s Confirmed

It be interesting how many of the 08 Brave girls will want to stay with him.

I can confirm that it’s not many.

Says McLean parent. 😂.
They will be there if MV is there.

Does MV have a good college network like BL, NM, and CW?

08s want MV because he will pick his team for FXU but don’t want the same coach for 4 years.

If MV did a good job, none of his players should be concerened about making any team on their own.

[Anonymous]

my favorite part of this whole thing is the dude with the mass emails threatening to sue everyone.... who opens up an email talking about how they fornicated 10x?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:my favorite part of this whole thing is the dude with the mass emails threatening to sue everyone.... who opens up an email talking about how they fornicated 10x?

GROSS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait, who is the dying club here? The one who just last month unexpectedly lost their talent pipeline? The one who is rushing this?

I’d love to see how Union does the next few years without SYC or another club feeding it talent.

SYC fed nothing... There were virtually no player movements between the 2 clubs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone really think ECNL would drop McLean if they refused this merger? So ECNL
would willingly lose Brave and McLean simultaneously? ECNL did not make McLean do this. This is 100% McLean mistakenly thinking that an alliance is how they capitalize on Brave’s demise.

Dude - you won when your nearby competitor went away. Sit back and watch the Brave players and coaches come to you. An alliance is just the exact wrong move.

100% agreed. But with JW and AP leaving, they were in a tough spot. If they could only admit it...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, who is the dying club here? The one who just last month unexpectedly lost their talent pipeline? The one who is rushing this?

I’d love to see how Union does the next few years without SYC or another club feeding it talent.

SYC fed nothing... There were virtually no player movements between the 2 clubs.

If you follow the MYS board meetings, in the first half of 2023, they planned to continue the partnership. So clearly they thought they were getting something out of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would be shocked if MV got teams and 1 if anything...either he is an awful coach or he never had the players at BRAVE that allowed him to play his style

MV is getting the 2008G

AND 2010s Confirmed

It be interesting how many of the 08 Brave girls will want to stay with him.

I can confirm that it’s not many.

Says McLean parent. 😂.
They will be there if MV is there.

Does MV have a good college network like BL, NM, and CW?

What is a good college network. Top 25 schools? D1? High academics D1 and 3? What is that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone really think ECNL would drop McLean if they refused this merger? So ECNL
would willingly lose Brave and McLean simultaneously? ECNL did not make McLean do this. This is 100% McLean mistakenly thinking that an alliance is how they capitalize on Brave’s demise.

Dude - you won when your nearby competitor went away. Sit back and watch the Brave players and coaches come to you. An alliance is just the exact wrong move.

100% agreed. But with JW and AP leaving, they were in a tough spot. If they could only admit it...

Any idea where JW and AP are going?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, who is the dying club here? The one who just last month unexpectedly lost their talent pipeline? The one who is rushing this?

I’d love to see how Union does the next few years without SYC or another club feeding it talent.

SYC fed nothing... There were virtually no player movements between the 2 clubs.

If you follow the MYS board meetings, in the first half of 2023, they planned to continue the partnership. So clearly they thought they were getting something out of it.

And in the second half if you follow the board minutes they began discussing dissolving …

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, who is the dying club here? The one who just last month unexpectedly lost their talent pipeline? The one who is rushing this?

I’d love to see how Union does the next few years without SYC or another club feeding it talent.

SYC fed nothing... There were virtually no player movements between the 2 clubs.

If you follow the MYS board meetings, in the first half of 2023, they planned to continue the partnership. So clearly they thought they were getting something out of it.

And in the second half if you follow the board minutes they began discussing dissolving …

Because SYC bailed. MYS has not been driving the bus here.