“As a direct result of the EPA’s laissez-faire regulatory approach, in 2019 the U.S. used over 70 agricultural pesticides that were banned in the European Union, amounting to 322 million pounds used each year. That means over a quarter of all U.S. agricultural pesticide use was from pesticides that all EU member states have prohibited. And with more recent bans on pesticides like chlorothalonil and the EU’s new farm-to-fork strategy which aims to cut pesticide use in half by 2030, that regulatory disparity is growing significantly by the year. It is not just Europe that is embracing these prohibitions. The U.S. uses 26 and 40 million pounds of pesticides that Brazil and China have banned or are phasing out, respectively. India is currently considering banning 27 highly hazardous pesticides, like atrazine, 2,4-D, and acephate, which the U.S. uses over 100 million pounds of each year. Atrazine is a known endocrine disruptor linked to fertility problems; 2,4-D is associated with certain cancers and birth defects in children; and acephate is a known neurotoxin in the same class of chemicals as those developed for use as nerve agents in World War II.” https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-the-epas-lax-regulation-of-dangerous-pesticides-is-hurting-public-health-and-the-us-economy/ If you read that article, we are just about the only country permitting more questionable pesticides, while other countries are tightening their use. Plus there is a far greater abundance and spectrum of emulsifiers (to preserve foods) and artificial sweeteners in play in the US. Not to mention, we have very low standards for raising animals for meat/dairy production. And the cherry on top is the added sugar and other additives that get added into the food supply…and sure, individuals can avoid to a certain extent lower quality processed foods, but that is what is getting served up in food cafeterias around the country to our children, from pre-k through college. |
|
People, it’s not that complicated.
You can get a really nice bento sent in a country like Japan for $8 that’s got nice piece of grilled fish, rice, veggies, and some pickled stuff for $6. Portions not stingy. Meanwhile garbage food like a McDonald’s meal will run you $15+ now. There’s just so, sooooooooo many options from $1-20 in Asia that are high quality good eatin’ compared to here where $20 is now barely getting you the lowest of low quality for something as basic as burgers and pizzas. |
|
This is literally train station fast food in Tokyo, the most expensive city in Japan:
Friggin Waygu rice boxes for below $10. Seafood boxes for under $15. Meanwhile, what are you gonna get in the US at the train station? Disgusting subway? Dunkin’ Donuts? Einstein bros? No wonder Americans are so obese. The food quality is horrible and it is expensive. Even after adjusting for PPP, US food is horribly expensive for terrible quality food. |
As someone who shops cheap, European quality for cheap food goods is vastly better than US quality for cheap food goods specifically because of better regulation in Europe on fillers and additives. I don't care that people in the US who have $$ can eat high quality, the point is what quality of cheap goods people without money can get. And yes, it's better there. |
Ah, you'll end up not liking those countries and will want to come back. |
The greater the demand for high quality food, the cheaper it will become. So if you want it, then be part of the demand. Everyone on this forum can easily afford it. |
+1. My perspective living as an expat who was definitely UMC on the local economy in Austria is that produce was fresh, affordable, and accessible. That green leaf lettuce you're paying $3-$4 here in the US was .99 Euro cents in Austria. My mother remarked on it every time she visited. |
You are glaringly out of touch. I live in a city where people barely have access to a grocery store near their house when they also can't afford a car, let alone the ability to pay for high quality foods on a meager income. You are sticking your head in the sand or under your fancy CSA crate. You are also willfully ignorant of basic, well documented and described differences in regulation of food additives and farming requirements in the US vs Europe. |
Yep and we noticed as well with meats and cheeses. Better quality for less. There should be public outcry over the fact that FDA doesn't require lead testing on children's food products in the US!!! Literally allowing harm to our children! "There is no federal requirement to test for lead in food made domestically or imported into the United States." https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/15/health/lead-poisoning-applesauce-pouches.html Contrast that to the EU: The EU regulation on setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs, sets limits for lead in food. These limits vary from 0.020 mg/kg in milk and infant formulae to 1.5 mg/kg in bivalve molluscs (e.g. oysters, mussels, scallops and clams). https://echa.europa.eu/hot-topics/lead |
Maybe if they stopped shoplifting, then they could have a grocery store nearby. |
Most of America's poor doesn't live in the cities, though. They live in areas like Mississippi and Appalachia, where land is cheap, plentiful, and fertile. And, they have access to the kind of produce that most people in cities will never taste in their lives. This isn't an issue about the US versus the French countryside. This is about the produce markets in cities. If you want high quality produce in cities, it will 1) cost more bc they have to transport thin skinned, delicate yet high quality fruits and veggies, and sell them immediately bc they are highly perishable. Or, 2) sell lower quality produce specifically bred to be hearty, thicker skinned, and less perishable. CSAs actually bring down the costs by ensuing a customer base. Yes we have issues with pesticides, etc. Maybe convince more people to invest in things like CSAs or get non profits to invest in local farms vs encouraging people to bring Hamburger Helper to food banks. We are not hopeless as a nation, we can do better if we focus on improving vs despairing. |
How do some people who travel not understand exchange rates? You realise the same bento box would have cost you $14 back in 2011. Exchange rates move. The US dollar is strong compared to the yen. You can only judge whether food is cheap in a country by comparing it to the average wage in that country. The average annual income in the US is $71,000. In Japan, it is $41,000. In Thailand, it is $3,700. Figure out how affordable your cheap meal is for people who live and earn money in the country you are traveling in, not for tourists loaded up with foreign currency. |
In America, most people will choose Einstein Bros or Subway anyway- regardless of the cost difference. They don’t buy Waygu rice or seafood boxes. If there was sufficient demand, these options would already exist. |
Even after accounting for exchange rates, it is still far cheaper for a Japanese person to eat out in Japan, or for a Thai person earning Thai baht to eat out in Thailand. Food abroad is so, soooo much better.. |
|
Anyone who doesn't believe US food sucks v rest of world is in denial. That is all.
The biggest factor among many is that culturally food matters in other countries more than in US. As simple as this fact - in Asia and Europe and Islands and LAtAm, people take meals seriously. Here in the US, most people do not. Lunch is school for example is grossness for our kids. In other countries adults would be eating better having school food than adult food in the US!!! My kid in US knows chicken tenders, pizza and spaghetti. Take any other country and their kid will eat a whole lot more variety and better. This is 100% true. |