My first date with my now-husband was at this monument, then we were engaged there, and my DD learned to walk right in front of it. Okay? What’s it to you? |
Then why is it a sculpture of his face? Do you not think that centers him as a person? |
Well said |
Lol |
| Perhaps Democratic stalinists can melt down the liberty bell to make a statue of George Floyd? |
😉 |
Your opinion of history is so laughably simplistic. I have to assume you learned it in a bot farm |
I don't understand why it would make anyone squeamish. Or what you mean by "question your privilege." Could you explain, or would that be asking you to do my emotional labor for me? I wouldn't want to tax your delicate sensibilities. |
In a thread that’s 90% right wingers working themselves into a lather with posts that show they’re actively working at being ignorant, your post is a breath of sanity. |
No. It’s the ONLY site in the city dedicated to the life and ideas of its founder. |
According to PP:
As a Quaker, Penn would abhor having a site like this dedicated to himself. It’s not modest. |
Sounds like the park is modest, isn't that the complaint? Too boring? |
It isn’t the quality of the park he’d reject it’s the entire notion of having a park dedicated to him with his effigy in the middle of it. Have you ever been inside a Quaker meeting house? (That’s what they call their “churches”—since you seem unfamiliar with Quakerism.) |
Fortunately for your family’s history, you can still point to the gigantic larger than life statue of Penn on top of city hall and say “mommy and daddy got engaged in front of a statue that looked just like that, only a lot smaller, that used to be in a nearby square” Phew! Your kid can still learn about William Penn and your engagement story. Crisis averted. |