Perry v Segura

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biberaj is going down and she will get absolutely nuked in the part of Loudoun in SD-31. If enough people split their tickets between Anderson and Perry, Perry will win.

You have to hope Biberaj isn’t getting landslided in the district if you want Perry to pull it out

lol Biberaj isn’t going down. Wishful thinking.

[Anonymous]

Segura is parking taco trucks outside polling places in violation of campaign laws. But R's don't care about Rule of Law. When you can't win honestly, cheat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Segura is parking taco trucks outside polling places in violation of campaign laws. But R's don't care about Rule of Law. When you can't win honestly, cheat.

1. Are the tacos free? If so, take family for free tacos.
2. Vote for Perry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Segura is parking taco trucks outside polling places in violation of campaign laws. But R's don't care about Rule of Law. When you can't win honestly, cheat.

I’ve been waiting 7 GD years for the tacos trucks on every corner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Segura is parking taco trucks outside polling places in violation of campaign laws. But R's don't care about Rule of Law. When you can't win honestly, cheat.

I’ve been waiting 7 GD years for the tacos trucks on every corner.

No kidding.

That guy who said it, September 1, 2016: "If you don't do something about it, you're going to have taco trucks on every corner."
Me: "Ooo!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Segura is parking taco trucks outside polling places in violation of campaign laws. But R's don't care about Rule of Law. When you can't win honestly, cheat.

I’ve been waiting 7 GD years for the tacos trucks on every corner.

No kidding.

That guy who said it, September 1, 2016: "If you don't do something about it, you're going to have taco trucks on every corner."
Me: "Ooo!"

He lost some votes that day. 🌮

[Anonymous]

These voting meetups are not wrong , they’ve been cleared by her attorney. The Dems are very embarrassingly trying anything to stop him. All she’s got is the abortion argument which really Segura is just putting a 15 week limit (which when you think of how they can successful resuscitate a 21 weeker at the level IV NICU at Inova Fairfax the thought of abortion between 16 + weeks is gross) with exceptions of rape, incest or the mother !
And the dems are being cowards they are scared

[Anonymous]

^ yup she’s got nothing
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/democratic-virginia-state-senate-candidate-dismisses-parental-rights-focuses-on-pro-choice-messaging/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These voting meetups are not wrong , they’ve been cleared by her attorney. The Dems are very embarrassingly trying anything to stop him. All she’s got is the abortion argument which really Segura is just putting a 15 week limit (which when you think of how they can successful resuscitate a 21 weeker at the level IV NICU at Inova Fairfax the thought of abortion between 16 + weeks is gross) with exceptions of rape, incest or the mother !
And the dems are being cowards they are scared

All she's got is that lots of people believe women's decisions about reproductive health care should be made by them and their health care providers, not by politicians.

And guess what? That's a lot.

What's gross is Segura's TV ad where his wife praises him for allowing her to make the decision to receive the standard of care after a miscarriage. Seriously, that's what he's got? What's next, an ad showing what a great guy he is for allowing her to make the decision to get a mammogram? Creepy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These voting meetups are not wrong , they’ve been cleared by her attorney. The Dems are very embarrassingly trying anything to stop him. All she’s got is the abortion argument which really Segura is just putting a 15 week limit (which when you think of how they can successful resuscitate a 21 weeker at the level IV NICU at Inova Fairfax the thought of abortion between 16 + weeks is gross) with exceptions of rape, incest or the mother !
And the dems are being cowards they are scared

All she's got is that lots of people believe women's decisions about reproductive health care should be made by them and their health care providers, not by politicians.

And guess what? That's a lot.

What's gross is Segura's TV ad where his wife praises him for allowing her to make the decision to receive the standard of care after a miscarriage. Seriously, that's what he's got? What's next, an ad showing what a great guy he is for allowing her to make the decision to get a mammogram? Creepy.

+1

I don’t want politicians (mostly male) making healthcare decisions for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This election and this seat in particular will decide if women maintain their reproductive rights. Real life consequences are on the line, not some imaginary CIA operation or boogie man crimes.

Look at all the states where abortion has restrictions beyond what RvW had. All those state have see a loss in doctors doing residencies. not just OBGYN doctors but new doctors to treat your hemorrhoids, viagra refills, and prostate cancer.

In states with restrictions we see skyrocketing maternal health issues and increased infant mortality. We see MORE VIOLENCE.

For over a year now we have heard horrific stories of women forced to carry babies with no brains, women sent home until they were septic, women losing their fertility. AND, pharmacies refusing to fill birth control cause despite what GOP says, birth control is next.

I can’t believe there are still folks out there that don’t see what the GOP has become. Look at the US House. MAGA has taken over the party. Even if they want, the “moderates” have no power/are too cowardly to stop MAGA.

I know my post won’t persuade 99% of folks here but I implore you to think about the implications of voting Republican AT THIS TIME. Once the MAGA faction is squashed we can all go back arguing about marginal tax rates. For now, MAGA needs to go (even the red vested ones).

No, people aren’t persuaded because you don’t back up your claims with facts. It’s all emotions, no reason.
Planned Parenthood, as wonderful as it is, is not publicizing all that it offers to women in challenging, potentially dangerous situations because they know the Dems always need abortion as a wedge issue. PP needs to expand its sm presence but it won’t! I’m frustrated as hell.

My relative is at WashU (Missouri) for a residency and what you claim simply isn’t true. Med school grads are clamoring to apply there and he is beyond thrilled to be in STL and so is his OB-GYN girlfriend.

PP, and other naysayers, I’m gifting this article.

Faced with abortion bans, doctors beg hospitals for help with key decisions
. Vague state laws, and a lack of guidance on how to interpret them, have led to some patients being denied care until they are critically ill.

https://wapo.st/470Gvxq

[Anonymous]

juan Pablo got a stern letter from Loudoun county parks for breaking the law. Lol! Even the PARKS hate this guy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:juan Pablo got a stern letter from Loudoun county parks for breaking the law. Lol! Even the PARKS hate this guy

^ Haters going to hate. You wish you could be him! Attractive, tall, poised, incredible public speaker, family man, wealthy, hard worker
I’m sorry you are not

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These voting meetups are not wrong , they’ve been cleared by her attorney. The Dems are very embarrassingly trying anything to stop him. All she’s got is the abortion argument which really Segura is just putting a 15 week limit (which when you think of how they can successful resuscitate a 21 weeker at the level IV NICU at Inova Fairfax the thought of abortion between 16 + weeks is gross) with exceptions of rape, incest or the mother !
And the dems are being cowards they are scared

^ This

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:juan Pablo got a stern letter from Loudoun county parks for breaking the law. Lol! Even the PARKS hate this guy

Oof. What a DB.