Prince Harry press lawsuit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s almost like the media killed his mother or something…
Oh wait.

The media didn't kill his mom. Drunk driver speeding and no seat belt did.

Those were contributing factors
They were being chased
She was photographed as she lay dying, one photo shows a halo made from the flash lights around her

I agree that the media played a very large role in her death. The tunnel is straight. All the driver needed to do is stay straight

[Anonymous]

Harry is his mother's son, with a tinge of his father's pomposity. Lots of charm, lots of emotional demons, and the completely inability to think with their head rather than their heart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry is his mother's son, with a tinge of his father's pomposity. Lots of charm, lots of emotional demons, and the completely inability to think with their head rather than their heart.

Charm? Not really. That was all smoke and mirrors. He's a petulant whiny man child who isn't very smart. This emperor has no clothes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then why do an Oprah show, Netflix series, and tell all book? If he really seeks privacy.

https://youtube.com/shorts/RTSpDQbZx-E?feature=share3

he seeks control of his own narrative and not to be spied on.

Why does he need a narrative? Move to a remote island and live your life raising sheep. But to attend star studded events, glitzy award ceremonies, Oprah specials, and then demand nobody look at you or write about you is ridiculous. He wants to have his cake and eat it too.

So it's either being harassed by the press constantly or total isolation. those are the only two choices he has in life? you are DAF.

Then learn to cope. Isn't that completely obvious to everyone but you and Harry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry is his mother's son, with a tinge of his father's pomposity. Lots of charm, lots of emotional demons, and the completely inability to think with their head rather than their heart.

He is a somewhat attractive middle-aged man who is interesting due to his connection to the royal family. The more he exposes himself and complains about his extremely privileged life, the less people will want to hear and see. Americans have a short attention span nowadays.

[Anonymous]

Oof, those court sketches. I’m neither a fan or a hater, but those court sketches are something else. Some are in caricature territory. Is that the norm for those kinds of sketches?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is his mother's son, with a tinge of his father's pomposity. Lots of charm, lots of emotional demons, and the completely inability to think with their head rather than their heart.

He is a somewhat attractive middle-aged man who is interesting due to his connection to the royal family. The more he exposes himself and complains about his extremely privileged life, the less people will want to hear and see. Americans have a short attention span nowadays.

If balding beady eye emotionally stunted unstable perpetual victims born with silver spoons are your thing, I guess he could be attractive to some.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry is his mother's son, with a tinge of his father's pomposity. Lots of charm, lots of emotional demons, and the completely inability to think with their head rather than their heart.

Would that be Charles or James?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is his mother's son, with a tinge of his father's pomposity. Lots of charm, lots of emotional demons, and the completely inability to think with their head rather than their heart.

He is a somewhat attractive middle-aged man who is interesting due to his connection to the royal family. The more he exposes himself and complains about his extremely privileged life, the less people will want to hear and see. Americans have a short attention span nowadays.

If balding beady eye emotionally stunted unstable perpetual victims born with silver spoons are your thing, I guess he could be attractive to some.

He's actually not my type but I am giving him the benefit of the doubt for those who like tall redheads with British accents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oof, those court sketches. I’m neither a fan or a hater, but those court sketches are something else. Some are in caricature territory. Is that the norm for those kinds of sketches?

Yes, they are never flattering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s almost like the media killed his mother or something…
Oh wait.

The media didn't kill his mom. Drunk driver speeding and no seat belt did.

Those were contributing factors
They were being chased
She was photographed as she lay dying, one photo shows a halo made from the flash lights around her

I agree that the media played a very large role in her death. The tunnel is straight. All the driver needed to do is stay straight

There was no need for the driver to speed away from the photographers. He could have just driven at a normal, safe speed. No one forced him to race away from the photographers.

What harm would have come from not speeding? Some photographers would have taken pictures of the car? Who cares? Everyone in that car would be alive today if the driver had chosen to drive at the speed limit.

(Oh, and seatbelts, too. The people in the car who chose not to wear seatbelts might have had a better outcome even with the speeding had they just put their seatbelts on.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s almost like the media killed his mother or something…
Oh wait.

The media didn't kill his mom. Drunk driver speeding and no seat belt did.

Those were contributing factors
They were being chased
She was photographed as she lay dying, one photo shows a halo made from the flash lights around her

I agree that the media played a very large role in her death. The tunnel is straight. All the driver needed to do is stay straight

There was no need for the driver to speed away from the photographers. He could have just driven at a normal, safe speed. No one forced him to race away from the photographers.

What harm would have come from not speeding? Some photographers would have taken pictures of the car? Who cares? Everyone in that car would be alive today if the driver had chosen to drive at the speed limit.

(Oh, and seatbelts, too. The people in the car who chose not to wear seatbelts might have had a better outcome even with the speeding had they just put their seatbelts on.)

Oh good, back to blaming Diana for her death. Right on time.

[Anonymous]

How is this resolved, by the way? I know the big headline is Harry but it’s part of a class-action type suit right? Is there one sum awarded to be distributed among the group or do they rule each individual separately?

[Anonymous]

The chickens are coming hime to roost for this guy and I am here for it!

[Anonymous]

He went past his early trauma and did a lot of wonderful things. Don't you remember him picking up where his mother left off with the African Aids babies, and holding them in his arms? The Invictus games etc?

He is going through something. This does not define him as a human being. It's bad and it has a bad look and a bad smell and I really hope he moves past it.