Prince Harry press lawsuit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prince Harry is like the kid in an abusive dysfunctional family/system who tells the truth. When you do that the family members or stakeholders who don’t want to stop the dysfunction or abuse attack you for it. Tyler Perry was right. It’s an abusive system and the public participates in it.

I listened to Spare. The way the majority of the British press, but particularly the tabloids, misrepresented what was in the book was awful and the members of the public that parrot those tabloid talking points are part of the problem.

Good for Harry to stand up for himself and his family. If nothing changes you will one day see stories in the press about Prince Louis characterizing him as the “screw up”, the “dim wit”, the “clown”, or whatever so that Prince George will always look better whether it is true or not. It’s gross.

Finally, William referred to his mother being “paranoid”. She wasn’t. She was being spied on, briefed against, leaked against, and lied about. She was fearful and wasn’t sure who to trust because of it. That’s not being paranoid. That’s facing the reality of your situation.

Being under BRF-level of scrutiny is certainly not easy, but don't discount how hard it must have been for William and Harry to deal with their parents non-stop battling and their mother's mental illness. William may have had a very different experience from Harry's. Harry seems to idolize his late mother, which isn't necessarily healthy either. Very tough situation for both William and Harry.

Harry had to deal with both his mother’s untimely passing and his second-banana status right from age 12. With Charles for a father.

Many Many people have had it way worse and didn't walk away with Many MILLIONS of dollars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prince Harry is like the kid in an abusive dysfunctional family/system who tells the truth. When you do that the family members or stakeholders who don’t want to stop the dysfunction or abuse attack you for it. Tyler Perry was right. It’s an abusive system and the public participates in it.

I listened to Spare. The way the majority of the British press, but particularly the tabloids, misrepresented what was in the book was awful and the members of the public that parrot those tabloid talking points are part of the problem.

Good for Harry to stand up for himself and his family. If nothing changes you will one day see stories in the press about Prince Louis characterizing him as the “screw up”, the “dim wit”, the “clown”, or whatever so that Prince George will always look better whether it is true or not. It’s gross.

Finally, William referred to his mother being “paranoid”. She wasn’t. She was being spied on, briefed against, leaked against, and lied about. She was fearful and wasn’t sure who to trust because of it. That’s not being paranoid. That’s facing the reality of your situation.

Being under BRF-level of scrutiny is certainly not easy, but don't discount how hard it must have been for William and Harry to deal with their parents non-stop battling and their mother's mental illness. William may have had a very different experience from Harry's. Harry seems to idolize his late mother, which isn't necessarily healthy either. Very tough situation for both William and Harry.

Harry had to deal with both his mother’s untimely passing and his second-banana status right from age 12. With Charles for a father.

Many Many people have had it way worse and didn't walk away with Many MILLIONS of dollars.

Harry needs to just come to terms that he's not cut out for a high profile public life. He's too thin skinned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry again admitted drug use in sworn testimony. Mirroring what he has said in his book and interviews. I really want to know how the FOIA request about his visa goes. He just doesn't seem very bright and can't keep his stories straight.

I dont understand why you all seem to think this is such a big deal- lots of people used drugs, were members of socialist/communist parties when they apply for visas to the USA- ordinary people and guess what? they get the visa! Its such a strange gap between people who live in teh district and ow popped who have moved here from al over and these parochial types who imagine all immigrants are illegals from Mexico swimming the rio grande.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone following this story? The amount of stress Harry must have had under the tabloids glare is crazy. He says they were a big factor in Chelsy Davy breaking up with him.

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/harry-give-evidence-uk-lawsuit-against-tabloid-publisher-2023-06-05/

Just another mile on the Sussex "we want Privacy" tour? (So looking forward to South Park when writer's strike is over. So much material to follow up on their never ending tour!)

He has done more harm Chelsy Davis than all of the tabloids! Frankly, I suspect that Harry is on something strong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry again admitted drug use in sworn testimony. Mirroring what he has said in his book and interviews. I really want to know how the FOIA request about his visa goes. He just doesn't seem very bright and can't keep his stories straight.

I dont understand why you all seem to think this is such a big deal- lots of people used drugs, were members of socialist/communist parties when they apply for visas to the USA- ordinary people and guess what? they get the visa! Its such a strange gap between people who live in teh district and ow popped who have moved here from al over and these parochial types who imagine all immigrants are illegals from Mexico swimming the rio grande.

Proofread pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prince Harry is like the kid in an abusive dysfunctional family/system who tells the truth. When you do that the family members or stakeholders who don’t want to stop the dysfunction or abuse attack you for it. Tyler Perry was right. It’s an abusive system and the public participates in it.

I listened to Spare. The way the majority of the British press, but particularly the tabloids, misrepresented what was in the book was awful and the members of the public that parrot those tabloid talking points are part of the problem.

Good for Harry to stand up for himself and his family. If nothing changes you will one day see stories in the press about Prince Louis characterizing him as the “screw up”, the “dim wit”, the “clown”, or whatever so that Prince George will always look better whether it is true or not. It’s gross.

Finally, William referred to his mother being “paranoid”. She wasn’t. She was being spied on, briefed against, leaked against, and lied about. She was fearful and wasn’t sure who to trust because of it. That’s not being paranoid. That’s facing the reality of your situation.

Being under BRF-level of scrutiny is certainly not easy, but don't discount how hard it must have been for William and Harry to deal with their parents non-stop battling and their mother's mental illness. William may have had a very different experience from Harry's. Harry seems to idolize his late mother, which isn't necessarily healthy either. Very tough situation for both William and Harry.

Harry had to deal with both his mother’s untimely passing and his second-banana status right from age 12. With Charles for a father.

Many Many people have had it way worse and didn't walk away with Many MILLIONS of dollars.

Harry needs to just come to terms that he's not cut out for a high profile public life. He's too thin skinned.

Sadly, his wife will not allow it. Harry needs a life out of the limelight for a long time to work through his traumatic past and learn to live an authentic life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry again admitted drug use in sworn testimony. Mirroring what he has said in his book and interviews. I really want to know how the FOIA request about his visa goes. He just doesn't seem very bright and can't keep his stories straight.

I dont understand why you all seem to think this is such a big deal- lots of people used drugs, were members of socialist/communist parties when they apply for visas to the USA- ordinary people and guess what? they get the visa! Its such a strange gap between people who live in teh district and ow popped who have moved here from al over and these parochial types who imagine all immigrants are illegals from Mexico swimming the rio grande.

Proofread pp.

Lol good comeback. They’re right. Has Heritage Foundation investigated Ozzy Osborne, Mick Jagger, or Boris Johnson? Nothing will come of this inquiry, at best you’ll get a couple pages with a ton of black lines of redacted info. In certain circles it’s popular to dislike Harry and Meghan, so Heritage Foundation is capitalizing on that. Sorry!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s almost like the media killed his mother or something…
Oh wait.

No. Poor choices of getting into a car with a drunk driver and not fastening her seat belt killed his mother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But she chose it.

I don’t sign up to be a coal miner and complain that I don’t like working in the dark.

She was young and naive and didn't know much about his family or his job.

She was 36, not 19 like Diana.

This! She was not "young" and naive at all.

Yes, we'll have to assume the "young and naive" poster was being sarcastic.

Poor young Meghan, she knew nothing about the royal family. She didn’t have the resources to get information. Awww

There are photos of her with Prince Andrew when she was a"yacht girl" and Virginia Guiffre lawyers wanted to depose Megan. Speculation was one of the reasons the case was settled was to spare Meghan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry again admitted drug use in sworn testimony. Mirroring what he has said in his book and interviews. I really want to know how the FOIA request about his visa goes. He just doesn't seem very bright and can't keep his stories straight.

I dont understand why you all seem to think this is such a big deal- lots of people used drugs, were members of socialist/communist parties when they apply for visas to the USA- ordinary people and guess what? they get the visa! Its such a strange gap between people who live in teh district and ow popped who have moved here from al over and these parochial types who imagine all immigrants are illegals from Mexico swimming the rio grande.

Proofread pp.

Lol good comeback. They’re right. Has Heritage Foundation investigated Ozzy Osborne, Mick Jagger, or Boris Johnson? Nothing will come of this inquiry, at best you’ll get a couple pages with a ton of black lines of redacted info. In certain circles it’s popular to dislike Harry and Meghan, so Heritage Foundation is capitalizing on that. Sorry!

It’s not a comeback. If you want people to be able to understand what you wrote, take some time to proofread so it can be understood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But she chose it.

I don’t sign up to be a coal miner and complain that I don’t like working in the dark.

She was young and naive and didn't know much about his family or his job.

She was 36, not 19 like Diana.

This! She was not "young" and naive at all.

Yes, we'll have to assume the "young and naive" poster was being sarcastic.

Poor young Meghan, she knew nothing about the royal family. She didn’t have the resources to get information. Awww

There are photos of her with Prince Andrew when she was a"yacht girl" and Virginia Guiffre lawyers wanted to depose Megan. Speculation was one of the reasons the case was settled was to spare Meghan.

Is this true?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry again admitted drug use in sworn testimony. Mirroring what he has said in his book and interviews. I really want to know how the FOIA request about his visa goes. He just doesn't seem very bright and can't keep his stories straight.

I dont understand why you all seem to think this is such a big deal- lots of people used drugs, were members of socialist/communist parties when they apply for visas to the USA- ordinary people and guess what? they get the visa! Its such a strange gap between people who live in teh district and ow popped who have moved here from al over and these parochial types who imagine all immigrants are illegals from Mexico swimming the rio grande.

Proofread pp.

Lol good comeback. They’re right. Has Heritage Foundation investigated Ozzy Osborne, Mick Jagger, or Boris Johnson? Nothing will come of this inquiry, at best you’ll get a couple pages with a ton of black lines of redacted info. In certain circles it’s popular to dislike Harry and Meghan, so Heritage Foundation is capitalizing on that. Sorry!

Boris Johnson is a natural born US citizen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But she chose it.

I don’t sign up to be a coal miner and complain that I don’t like working in the dark.

She was young and naive and didn't know much about his family or his job.

She was 36, not 19 like Diana.

This! She was not "young" and naive at all.

Yes, we'll have to assume the "young and naive" poster was being sarcastic.

Poor young Meghan, she knew nothing about the royal family. She didn’t have the resources to get information. Awww

There are photos of her with Prince Andrew when she was a"yacht girl" and Virginia Guiffre lawyers wanted to depose Megan. Speculation was one of the reasons the case was settled was to spare Meghan.

Is this true?

Nope!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry again admitted drug use in sworn testimony. Mirroring what he has said in his book and interviews. I really want to know how the FOIA request about his visa goes. He just doesn't seem very bright and can't keep his stories straight.

I dont understand why you all seem to think this is such a big deal- lots of people used drugs, were members of socialist/communist parties when they apply for visas to the USA- ordinary people and guess what? they get the visa! Its such a strange gap between people who live in teh district and ow popped who have moved here from al over and these parochial types who imagine all immigrants are illegals from Mexico swimming the rio grande.

Proofread pp.

Lol good comeback. They’re right. Has Heritage Foundation investigated Ozzy Osborne, Mick Jagger, or Boris Johnson? Nothing will come of this inquiry, at best you’ll get a couple pages with a ton of black lines of redacted info. In certain circles it’s popular to dislike Harry and Meghan, so Heritage Foundation is capitalizing on that. Sorry!

Boris Johnson is a natural born US citizen.

Was, yes. He renounced his citizenship before becoming prime minister.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s almost like the media killed his mother or something…
Oh wait.

No. Poor choices of getting into a car with a drunk driver and not fastening her seat belt killed his mother.

The worst poor choice was that of the driver to drink and then decide to speed away from cars containing… photographers. Yes, Diana should have had her seatbelt on, but had the driver been driving the car at a safe speed, all would have been fine.

It was not Diana’s fault that the driver was speeding. Speeding is what caused the accident. The driver chose to speed away from the photographers, a completely unnecessary move on his part.