Prince Harry press lawsuit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry again admitted drug use in sworn testimony. Mirroring what he has said in his book and interviews. I really want to know how the FOIA request about his visa goes. He just doesn't seem very bright and can't keep his stories straight.

I dont understand why you all seem to think this is such a big deal- lots of people used drugs, were members of socialist/communist parties when they apply for visas to the USA- ordinary people and guess what? they get the visa! Its such a strange gap between people who live in teh district and ow popped who have moved here from al over and these parochial types who imagine all immigrants are illegals from Mexico swimming the rio grande.

Proofread pp.

Lol good comeback. They’re right. Has Heritage Foundation investigated Ozzy Osborne, Mick Jagger, or Boris Johnson? Nothing will come of this inquiry, at best you’ll get a couple pages with a ton of black lines of redacted info. In certain circles it’s popular to dislike Harry and Meghan, so Heritage Foundation is capitalizing on that. Sorry!

Boris Johnson is a natural born US citizen.

Was, yes. He renounced his citizenship before becoming prime minister.

If he came into the US thereafter on an A1 visa (head of state), then I assure you, none of his past drug use would have mattered a bit. He could have killed someone with his bare hands and it would still be OK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry again admitted drug use in sworn testimony. Mirroring what he has said in his book and interviews. I really want to know how the FOIA request about his visa goes. He just doesn't seem very bright and can't keep his stories straight.

I dont understand why you all seem to think this is such a big deal- lots of people used drugs, were members of socialist/communist parties when they apply for visas to the USA- ordinary people and guess what? they get the visa! Its such a strange gap between people who live in teh district and ow popped who have moved here from al over and these parochial types who imagine all immigrants are illegals from Mexico swimming the rio grande.

Proofread pp.

Lol good comeback. They’re right. Has Heritage Foundation investigated Ozzy Osborne, Mick Jagger, or Boris Johnson? Nothing will come of this inquiry, at best you’ll get a couple pages with a ton of black lines of redacted info. In certain circles it’s popular to dislike Harry and Meghan, so Heritage Foundation is capitalizing on that. Sorry!

Boris Johnson is a natural born US citizen.

Was, yes. He renounced his citizenship before becoming prime minister.

If he came into the US thereafter on an A1 visa (head of state), then I assure you, none of his past drug use would have mattered a bit. He could have killed someone with his bare hands and it would still be OK.

He came here in March to campaign for some US candidates, I would assume as a private citizen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prince Harry is like the kid in an abusive dysfunctional family/system who tells the truth. When you do that the family members or stakeholders who don’t want to stop the dysfunction or abuse attack you for it. Tyler Perry was right. It’s an abusive system and the public participates in it.

I listened to Spare. The way the majority of the British press, but particularly the tabloids, misrepresented what was in the book was awful and the members of the public that parrot those tabloid talking points are part of the problem.

Good for Harry to stand up for himself and his family. If nothing changes you will one day see stories in the press about Prince Louis characterizing him as the “screw up”, the “dim wit”, the “clown”, or whatever so that Prince George will always look better whether it is true or not. It’s gross.

Finally, William referred to his mother being “paranoid”. She wasn’t. She was being spied on, briefed against, leaked against, and lied about. She was fearful and wasn’t sure who to trust because of it. That’s not being paranoid. That’s facing the reality of your situation.

William was his mother's confidante as a young teen. Whether she was rationally or irrationally paranoid, those are not to be shared with your child. While Harry has idolized the memory of his mother, William has a very different perspective. However, he hasn't made his entire life about his mother

This doesn't get mentioned enough. I feel so much compassion for William. His mother forced him to shoulder so much responsibility for her feelings. You can tell he's really done the hard work working through that. He loves his mother but can admit she had a lot of problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But she chose it.

I don’t sign up to be a coal miner and complain that I don’t like working in the dark.

She was young and naive and didn't know much about his family or his job.

She was 36, not 19 like Diana.

This! She was not "young" and naive at all.

Yes, we'll have to assume the "young and naive" poster was being sarcastic.

Poor young Meghan, she knew nothing about the royal family. She didn’t have the resources to get information. Awww

There are photos of her with Prince Andrew when she was a"yacht girl" and Virginia Guiffre lawyers wanted to depose Megan. Speculation was one of the reasons the case was settled was to spare Meghan.

Is this true?

It's true. Google for pics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s almost like the media killed his mother or something…
Oh wait.

No. Poor choices of getting into a car with a drunk driver and not fastening her seat belt killed his mother.

The worst poor choice was that of the driver to drink and then decide to speed away from cars containing… photographers. Yes, Diana should have had her seatbelt on, but had the driver been driving the car at a safe speed, all would have been fine.

It was not Diana’s fault that the driver was speeding. Speeding is what caused the accident. The driver chose to speed away from the photographers, a completely unnecessary move on his part.

It was her fault not to fasted her seat belt as the only one who survived was wearing his seat belt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But she chose it.

I don’t sign up to be a coal miner and complain that I don’t like working in the dark.

She was young and naive and didn't know much about his family or his job.

She was 36, not 19 like Diana.

This! She was not "young" and naive at all.

Yes, we'll have to assume the "young and naive" poster was being sarcastic.

Poor young Meghan, she knew nothing about the royal family. She didn’t have the resources to get information. Awww

There are photos of her with Prince Andrew when she was a"yacht girl" and Virginia Guiffre lawyers wanted to depose Megan. Speculation was one of the reasons the case was settled was to spare Meghan.

Is this true?

It's true. Google for pics.

It's not well known. Sounds like the RF protected her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s almost like the media killed his mother or something…
Oh wait.

No. Poor choices of getting into a car with a drunk driver and not fastening her seat belt killed his mother.

The worst poor choice was that of the driver to drink and then decide to speed away from cars containing… photographers. Yes, Diana should have had her seatbelt on, but had the driver been driving the car at a safe speed, all would have been fine.

It was not Diana’s fault that the driver was speeding. Speeding is what caused the accident. The driver chose to speed away from the photographers, a completely unnecessary move on his part.

It was her fault not to fasted her seat belt as the only one who survived was wearing his seat belt

There would have been no accident to survive if the driver hadn’t decided to speed in some silly desire to outrun the photographers. Sorry, that was a bad idea.

[Anonymous]

Was speeding away from the photographers the driver's decision? I thought he was an employee, acting at his employer's direction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was speeding away from the photographers the driver's decision? I thought he was an employee, acting at his employer's direction.

You don't have to follow orders to break the law. Diana was not that powerful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
You don't have to follow orders to break the law. Diana was not that powerful.

No, of course not. But an employer who orders an employee to do something illegal and dangerous is at least as responsible as the employee. Diana was not a helpless child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prince Harry is like the kid in an abusive dysfunctional family/system who tells the truth. When you do that the family members or stakeholders who don’t want to stop the dysfunction or abuse attack you for it. Tyler Perry was right. It’s an abusive system and the public participates in it.

I listened to Spare. The way the majority of the British press, but particularly the tabloids, misrepresented what was in the book was awful and the members of the public that parrot those tabloid talking points are part of the problem.

Good for Harry to stand up for himself and his family. If nothing changes you will one day see stories in the press about Prince Louis characterizing him as the “screw up”, the “dim wit”, the “clown”, or whatever so that Prince George will always look better whether it is true or not. It’s gross.

Finally, William referred to his mother being “paranoid”. She wasn’t. She was being spied on, briefed against, leaked against, and lied about. She was fearful and wasn’t sure who to trust because of it. That’s not being paranoid. That’s facing the reality of your situation.

William was his mother's confidante as a young teen. Whether she was rationally or irrationally paranoid, those are not to be shared with your child. While Harry has idolized the memory of his mother, William has a very different perspective. However, he hasn't made his entire life about his mother

This doesn't get mentioned enough. I feel so much compassion for William. His mother forced him to shoulder so much responsibility for her feelings. You can tell he's really done the hard work working through that. He loves his mother but can admit she had a lot of problems.

+1 I feel bad for William dealing with the same family problems and now trying to navigate his dad and new wife with all that history as the monarchs, creepy uncle who's still whining for more, and now a mentally ill brother with a scheming, jealous wife who are intent on taking down William and his family. William and Kate seem like the only sane ones in the bunch.