Prince Harry press lawsuit

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Harry is his mother's son, with a tinge of his father's pomposity. Lots of charm, lots of emotional demons, and the completely inability to think with their head rather than their heart.


He has no charm. That's one of his many problems.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Harry is his mother's son, with a tinge of his father's pomposity. Lots of charm, lots of emotional demons, and the completely inability to think with their head rather than their heart.


I don't see the same empathy and kindness that his mother had, just the unfortunate mental illness.
Anonymous
I’m always so troubled to see the same person posting negative responses to the same comments one after another for hours. Very creepy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I’m always so troubled to see the same person posting negative responses to the same comments one after another for hours. Very creepy.


It's not just one person, pp.
Anonymous
I just saw that this thing is expected to last 6-7 weeks! There’s an actress on the stand today. Anyone care to pick apart her testimony or is that a privilege reserved for Harry?

The mental impact of all the hacking is huge. This actress (that I never heard of until today) talks about how she thought her closest friends and family were selling stories about her. I can imagine it’s a pretty tough situation when these stories come out about you and rather then leaning on your friends for support, you’re trying to figure out which one sold you out. Instead, it’s sleazy journalists listening to your voicemails or using other illegal tactics.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m always so troubled to see the same person posting negative responses to the same comments one after another for hours. Very creepy.


It's not just one person, pp.

I don’t doubt that there are multiple people posting negative comments. But there is also clearly someone who goes on sprees responding to the same comments over and over.
Anonymous
Prince Harry is like the kid in an abusive dysfunctional family/system who tells the truth. When you do that the family members or stakeholders who don’t want to stop the dysfunction or abuse attack you for it. Tyler Perry was right. It’s an abusive system and the public participates in it.

I listened to Spare. The way the majority of the British press, but particularly the tabloids, misrepresented what was in the book was awful and the members of the public that parrot those tabloid talking points are part of the problem.

Good for Harry to stand up for himself and his family. If nothing changes you will one day see stories in the press about Prince Louis characterizing him as the “screw up”, the “dim wit”, the “clown”, or whatever so that Prince George will always look better whether it is true or not. It’s gross.

Finally, William referred to his mother being “paranoid”. She wasn’t. She was being spied on, briefed against, leaked against, and lied about. She was fearful and wasn’t sure who to trust because of it. That’s not being paranoid. That’s facing the reality of your situation.
Anonymous
It's too bad he and his wife are profiting so handsomely from "telling the truth". If they weren't, more people would respect and believe them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I just saw that this thing is expected to last 6-7 weeks! There’s an actress on the stand today. Anyone care to pick apart her testimony or is that a privilege reserved for Harry?

The mental impact of all the hacking is huge. This actress (that I never heard of until today) talks about how she thought her closest friends and family were selling stories about her. I can imagine it’s a pretty tough situation when these stories come out about you and rather then leaning on your friends for support, you’re trying to figure out which one sold you out. Instead, it’s sleazy journalists listening to your voicemails or using other illegal tactics.


“A privilege reserved for Harry?” Umm. He put himself in the public eye way beyond what he would be for the BRF - Oprah, Netflix, The Spare, night shows promoting his book. Constant announcements about himself ie the “2 hour dangerous car chase” that NYC Mayor Adams and NYP said he was basically fabrication. Yes, Harry deserves to have his words picked over since he is always talking and evidently making stuff up too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m always so troubled to see the same person posting negative responses to the same comments one after another for hours. Very creepy.


It's not just one person, pp.

I don’t doubt that there are multiple people posting negative comments. But there is also clearly someone who goes on sprees responding to the same comments over and over.


DP here. Lots of people disagree with you and have negative comments about Harry.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Prince Harry is like the kid in an abusive dysfunctional family/system who tells the truth. When you do that the family members or stakeholders who don’t want to stop the dysfunction or abuse attack you for it. Tyler Perry was right. It’s an abusive system and the public participates in it.

I listened to Spare. The way the majority of the British press, but particularly the tabloids, misrepresented what was in the book was awful and the members of the public that parrot those tabloid talking points are part of the problem.

Good for Harry to stand up for himself and his family. If nothing changes you will one day see stories in the press about Prince Louis characterizing him as the “screw up”, the “dim wit”, the “clown”, or whatever so that Prince George will always look better whether it is true or not. It’s gross.

Finally, William referred to his mother being “paranoid”. She wasn’t. She was being spied on, briefed against, leaked against, and lied about. She was fearful and wasn’t sure who to trust because of it. That’s not being paranoid. That’s facing the reality of your situation.


Being under BRF-level of scrutiny is certainly not easy, but don't discount how hard it must have been for William and Harry to deal with their parents non-stop battling and their mother's mental illness. William may have had a very different experience from Harry's. Harry seems to idolize his late mother, which isn't necessarily healthy either. Very tough situation for both William and Harry.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Prince Harry is like the kid in an abusive dysfunctional family/system who tells the truth. When you do that the family members or stakeholders who don’t want to stop the dysfunction or abuse attack you for it. Tyler Perry was right. It’s an abusive system and the public participates in it.

I listened to Spare. The way the majority of the British press, but particularly the tabloids, misrepresented what was in the book was awful and the members of the public that parrot those tabloid talking points are part of the problem.

Good for Harry to stand up for himself and his family. If nothing changes you will one day see stories in the press about Prince Louis characterizing him as the “screw up”, the “dim wit”, the “clown”, or whatever so that Prince George will always look better whether it is true or not. It’s gross.

Finally, William referred to his mother being “paranoid”. She wasn’t. She was being spied on, briefed against, leaked against, and lied about. She was fearful and wasn’t sure who to trust because of it. That’s not being paranoid. That’s facing the reality of your situation.


Being under BRF-level of scrutiny is certainly not easy, but don't discount how hard it must have been for William and Harry to deal with their parents non-stop battling and their mother's mental illness. William may have had a very different experience from Harry's. Harry seems to idolize his late mother, which isn't necessarily healthy either. Very tough situation for both William and Harry.

Harry had to deal with both his mother’s untimely passing and his second-banana status right from age 12. With Charles for a father.
Anonymous
From what I understand, he has media resources working against his case and celebrity resources working to support his case. If he manages to harness media, it would help lots of celebrities hide their dirty laundry. Just like air brushed and filtered pictures instead of original looks, they want to control their public images as well. Media obviously want to make money by digging all that and even making up stories to get more clicks.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Prince Harry is like the kid in an abusive dysfunctional family/system who tells the truth. When you do that the family members or stakeholders who don’t want to stop the dysfunction or abuse attack you for it. Tyler Perry was right. It’s an abusive system and the public participates in it.

I listened to Spare. The way the majority of the British press, but particularly the tabloids, misrepresented what was in the book was awful and the members of the public that parrot those tabloid talking points are part of the problem.

Good for Harry to stand up for himself and his family. If nothing changes you will one day see stories in the press about Prince Louis characterizing him as the “screw up”, the “dim wit”, the “clown”, or whatever so that Prince George will always look better whether it is true or not. It’s gross.

Finally, William referred to his mother being “paranoid”. She wasn’t. She was being spied on, briefed against, leaked against, and lied about. She was fearful and wasn’t sure who to trust because of it. That’s not being paranoid. That’s facing the reality of your situation.


William was his mother's confidante as a young teen. Whether she was rationally or irrationally paranoid, those are not to be shared with your child. While Harry has idolized the memory of his mother, William has a very different perspective. However, he hasn't made his entire life about his mother
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's too bad he and his wife are profiting so handsomely from "telling the truth". If they weren't, more people would respect and believe them.


All his money is going straight to his lawyers. What a waste of a life.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: