NP The Golden Rule (You can find it in any great religion or moral philosophy) Love, kindness and compassion. The Buddha compared his teaching like a raft to cross over to the other side. |
Fairies and elves are also outside this world. They are created by storytellers - and believed by children, for a while. |
That is your religious belief. It is not a fact. |
I wonder why God let all those other religions exist, after establishing the one true religion of Roman Catholicism. |
Maybe because there are a bunch of different gods? I once read there are 8 billion people on earth and about as many different definitions of "God." |
But where the Golden Rule came from? Can you cite the first source? |
I don’t see why it is important to cite the first source. What is important is doing and living the Rule. Jesus said it is the greatest commandment. |
The Golden Rule is not one of the Ten Commandments |
Matthew 22, 36-40 Well, that is according to Jesus. |
Why can’t it be natural in origin? Like other customs such as family and living in communities? |
| Just talk to God. Like a friend - every day. After a few weeks you may have some answers and peace come to you…that’s your answer. |
If you line up your moral compass by some rule, it should be important to educate yourself on the origin of the rule, don't you think so? It is not in 10 commandments for sure. |
This is not my religious belief but logic. If there is no God, properly defined, then there is no objective truth. On what standing could you say that what you claim to be moral is actually moral, esp if I believe the opposite? This loss of theism is exactly why people today are so ungrounded. How can you have an honest conversation or debate about anything if you don't actually believe there is a truth that can be uncovered through the discussion? So people today just leave it as "your truths" as if that phrase even has any coherent meaning. Either there is Truth or there is not, but there are not multiple Truths. |
Things like the golden rule sound great in theory but are hopelessly broad for any defined moral compass. Treat others as I would want to be treated. Sure, great. But what if I hate myself and want to hurt myself? What if the "other" is someone who means me harm or is evil? Does that mean maybe I should use a different rubric? Love sounds great as well, but what does it mean in practice? Does it mean enabling a friend who i know is on the wrong path because it's "her truth" and I need to support whatever she chooses? Or does it mean condemning her path out of love, because love meaning willing the good of the other? But how do you even know what is the "good" without something more in your moral compass than generic quotes? The point is, these generic teachings can be used to point to any conclusion on a given topic. The people who support child sex transitions do so out of love and compassion. The people who oppose the do so out of love and compassion. If you have any conviction on the moral topics of the day, your moral compass is more refined than the golden rule. The only question is whether it has been refined based on objective Truth, or based on media, peers, and other things that are fickle and fleeting. |
If you mean it is natural as in placed in the conscience of every man by God, then yes, it is natural and I think the right way to look at it and why it is commonly shared across many religions and cultures. if you mean developed organically on a social level, then it cannot be objective truth, only situational. Things like customs are not universal and no one can claim one custom is objectively better than another. Some cultures live in larger communities than others, some eat different diets, some value family unit more than individuals, but one is not more right than the other. So I think you need to argue that the golden rule is not like a mere custom, because you want to objectively say that it is morally superior to follow the golden rule. |