PP here that is a Catholic convert from atheism. OP, i'm sorry about your experience as an outside at Catholic school. Having not grown up Catholic, this is my fear of catholic schools and sometimes I almost wonder if it is better to keep my kids from Catholicism until they reach adulthood and can then approach it with fresh mature eyes rather than be tainted by Catholic culture as kids. Anyways, I would caution writing off any religion. To seek the truth, you must be open to wherever it leads you, because you must let God do the leading. If you are writing something off, it means you don't want to be led and therefore you won't be. Your faith, or relationship with the Divine, or whatever you want to call it, has to be the central compass of you life. It is what will inform your other social and moral conviction (like the issue of same sex marriage), not the other way around. |
Yes, agreed. For those who have eyes to see, God has made himself abundantly clear. For those who refuse to see, nothing can "prove" God. |
This goes to the fundamental misunderstanding of God. Science cannot "find" or "prove" God because science is about detecting and understanding this world. God is outside of this world (and creator of this world). The creator cannot be proved and isolated by tools of his creation. However, you can look at the creation and deduce certain characteristics about its creator. For example, the grandness and exuberance of the universe, the beauty of art/music/earth, the logic and beauty of mathematics, the love between people. Look deep into anything and I believe you will find proof of God. To believe that all these things are random is a greater leap of faith imo. Look deep into the human soul and its battle with itself and its complexity and nothing explains it adequately or satisfyingly except Christianity. |
How is that any different than if he didn’t exist? |
No different - just a religious viewpoint that makes non-believers seem narrow-minded and believers seem superior. |
I don't believe I need God to give me a social or moral compass. I'm a good person that helps others in need, a good friend, I give to charity and volunteer my time. I think that is integral to being human, shaped my life experience. You don't have to have faith to make the right choices. And if same sex marriage is an example of something that God thinks is a wrong moral choice then the Catholic version of 'God' is absolutely not what I am looking for. |
Do you believe your moral compass is objectively true? If so, where does it come from? If not, and everyone is free to have their own moral compass, then there is no such thing as a moral compass, just what each of us desires and doing what makes us feel good. Point is, objective truth only makes sense in context of the existence of something objectively true and unchanging, which is God. I agree that you don't need to believe in God to have a moral compass, but that moral compass still comes from God, regardless of whether you acknowledge its source. |
Not sure I understand the question. I recommend anyone who wants to understand what Christians mean when they say God to watch this video. Will also partly explain how God has made himself abundantly clear (in other words, more rational to believe in the existence of God than not). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zMf_8hkCdc |
Why did you choose Catholicism Vs other Christian denominations ? |
|
The difference is that if he did not exist then there will be no people who felt him, who heard him, who've seen him, who talked to him. |
How do you make sure that your moral compass is always showing North and not get derailed by magnetic field of mass media or public opinion? |
|
One more link because I am passionate about this topic and can't help myself. In this video, Bishop Barron lays out the 3 major arguments for the existence of God: argument from desire, argument from science, and argument from contingency. Great short primer for anyone interested.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qP2rLgrBtTI |
Once I was convinced there is a God, i started exploring different theistic religions. At first, i attended a Universalist Unitarian church because that was all I could handle. But then as I kept reading, that church was no longer enough (they tend to stay very surfacy about loving everyone and doing good but shies away from deeper questions). I read up on Islam but its view of God was not "that which nothing greater can be thought" imo, so I rejected that. I was really hung up on the idea of Jesus, so it took me a while to come to terms with Christianity as a possibility, but once I did, i started attending protestant churches simply out of accessibility. I found one I really liked (very intellectual approach to the Bible), but some reason, I just kept feeling like I had to keep searching. One day I walked into a Catholic Mass and while I was so confused by all the standing, kneeling, recitations, I felt a very deep sense of peace. Then I started researching Catholicism and everything I read just clicked and felt right (the theology not necessarily all the social teachings, which took more time). I remember reading the Catechism, which most people would probably find a dry read, and found it just so engaging haha! I appreciate the depth of Catholicism, its comfort with and embrace of ambiguity and mystery. I think on the logic side, I find Protestantism to be unsustainable. In my exploration of protestant churches, some churches were so different from each other as to be almost separate religions. That surely cannot be how God intends for his church to be, so it was more easy for me to believe that Matthew 16:18 meant that God established one church and will stand by her to the end. Either that or we are all screwed imho, because otherwise we are just following our own egos by establishing 30,000 different churches. |
What if they are mistaken and they just think they did? How can you tell the difference between the two if there’s no empirical evidence? |