Yeah, that’s not all. This ruling, clearly states by Clarence Thomas, also opens up Pandora’s box for future ruling against Gay marriage, Gay sex, that wrest on the same legal foundations. It’s weird he didn’t mention interracial marriage which basically wrests on the same unenumerated rights as the others he quoted in his dissent, but hey he’s a hypocritical zealot like so many organized religion nuts. Thanks guys. I hope you don’t have an ectopic Pregancy, or other life threatening pregnancy related condition an abortion would fix, and need an abortion but can’t travel out state. Maybe you’ll employ more than platitudes in your reasoning at that time, but I doubt it. |
Maybe this just means that pp won't spend their life trying to change someone’s opinion or calling their opinions or beliefs wrong. |
DP here, shouldn't everyone be encouraged to post, and free to state what they believe and why? Shouldn't others be able to engage them and ask questions without people resorting to name calling or the dramatic exit? |
We hope the same for your life occupations, too. |
Wondering if this the royal we or pp is speaking for multiple posters. |
+1 These religious extremists are infringing on *my* freedom of religion. |
Americans aren’t guaranteed freedom from religion. No one can make you practice religion, but also, they are guaranteed their right to practice religion. You might hear or see other Americans practicing their religion, and you have no right to be offended or try to stop them . |
DP here. Who is trying to do that? I will tell you who. No one. Anywhere. Ever. However, you don't need to look further than a daily news site to see the opposite happening. And BTW, you are 100% wrong about your first statement. American are guaranteed freedom from having to participate in religion. |
Ditto |
Other Americans practicing their religion and you hearing or seeing it isn’t religion being forced upon you. |
Correct, and no one said it is. As in the first sentence of the post you replied to but apparently didn't bother to read. That's you making up stuff. You're not being oppressed. |
NP. This is getting really lame because you bring it up everywhere, and it almost never works in the context, like here. So it just looks like the writer is stupid. That is all. |
|
The Jeffersonian “wall of separation between church and state,” the idea of separation of church and state, is actually not part of the U. S. Constitution. Its the First Amendment to the Constitution that states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” This limits Congress from passing certain laws, but it also ensures the religious freedom of U. S. citizens.
The signers of the Constitution were concerned with the abuses of a state church and took steps to prohibit the enshrinement of an official state religion in law. But they had no fear of religious expression in the public square. The majority of the Constitution’s signers claimed to be devout Christians and affirmed Christian beliefs. |
Pretty sure that the founders were not Catholic and did not want Catholic doctrine enshrined in law. Yet here we are with 6 Catholics rewriting 50 years of law, and ignoring precedent. They didn’t get there by accident. The Catholic Church has always used its money to assert control and power throughout history. The Church has spent an enormous amount of its resources on political activism, aligning with the Federalist society, and doing whatever it can to gain the exact type of power that the founders did not want. |
NP, really? sounds a lot like the poster who assumes everyone is tuned in to the religion forum all the time. |