Queen Elizabeth Platinum Jubilee

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Have Meghan and Harry been photographed yet?

Yes but don’t mention them unless you want this thread shut down. Jeff’s rules.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Solid gold coach? I wonder where the raw material was looted from.

India and Africa, like everything else valuable that they own.



Dearie, the most valuable thing the royal family owns is real estate in both India and Africa and throughout the world. That "gold" carriage is nothing compared to the real estate cash flow.


WTF? Are you 822 years old?

Any land the royal family owns in India and Africa is land they STOLE. They are disgusting racist a-holes.


Any land they have in the UK they have because of conquest and expropriation. They are the pinnacle of deadbeat leaches
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like the Queen has been holding on to meet Harry’s new baby and then… It’s the end?


He’s having another baby?


How would she meet a “new baby “if MM was having another one? He’s there for days. Obviously it was meant Lilibet.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Have Meghan and Harry been photographed yet?


Yes and I think it looks so much like what Kate wore yesterday.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like the Queen has been holding on to meet Harry’s new baby and then… It’s the end?


No. Have you seen how many great grandchildren she has? Twelve maybe. She gained 3 or 4 more in the past year. I think the death of Philip is probably more of a factor. And being 96. My parents and grandparents died well before that, and were wobblier with greater cognitive decline.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like the Queen has been holding on to meet Harry’s new baby and then… It’s the end?


No. Have you seen how many great grandchildren she has? Twelve maybe. She gained 3 or 4 more in the past year. I think the death of Philip is probably more of a factor. And being 96. My parents and grandparents died well before that, and were wobblier with greater cognitive decline.


Like it or not, she and Harry have a special relationship. And this child is named after her.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like the Queen has been holding on to meet Harry’s new baby and then… It’s the end?


No. Have you seen how many great grandchildren she has? Twelve maybe. She gained 3 or 4 more in the past year. I think the death of Philip is probably more of a factor. And being 96. My parents and grandparents died well before that, and were wobblier with greater cognitive decline.


Like it or not, she and Harry have a special relationship. And this child is named after her.


She is also supposed to have a special relationship with Anne's kids, and Sophie and Louise.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like the Queen has been holding on to meet Harry’s new baby and then… It’s the end?


More likely holding on for this platinum jubilee.

I wonder if she abdicates after this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like the Queen has been holding on to meet Harry’s new baby and then… It’s the end?


More likely holding on for this platinum jubilee.

I wonder if she abdicates after this.


I think it will be an unofficial regency, with Charles (who is already at reirement age) doing most of the work.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like the Queen has been holding on to meet Harry’s new baby and then… It’s the end?


More likely holding on for this platinum jubilee.

I wonder if she abdicates after this.


Have you ever listened to her? She's never abdicating and there's no reason to spend $1 billion on a Jubilee and then turn around and do the same billion for a coronation within 6 months. Especially when the Brits can't even afford to heat/cool their homes.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like the Queen has been holding on to meet Harry’s new baby and then… It’s the end?


No. Have you seen how many great grandchildren she has? Twelve maybe. She gained 3 or 4 more in the past year. I think the death of Philip is probably more of a factor. And being 96. My parents and grandparents died well before that, and were wobblier with greater cognitive decline.


Like it or not, she and Harry have a special relationship. And this child is named after her.


She is also supposed to have a special relationship with Anne's kids, and Sophie and Louise.


A couple of hundred years ago, she could have arranged for the family tree to curve back in on itself, now they're destined for irrelevance
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like the Queen has been holding on to meet Harry’s new baby and then… It’s the end?


No. Have you seen how many great grandchildren she has? Twelve maybe. She gained 3 or 4 more in the past year. I think the death of Philip is probably more of a factor. And being 96. My parents and grandparents died well before that, and were wobblier with greater cognitive decline.


Like it or not, she and Harry have a special relationship. And this child is named after her.


She is also supposed to have a special relationship with Anne's kids, and Sophie and Louise.


A couple of hundred years ago, she could have arranged for the family tree to curve back in on itself, now they're destined for irrelevance


She's already married to her cousin PP - how much curvier can you get.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like the Queen has been holding on to meet Harry’s new baby and then… It’s the end?


No. Have you seen how many great grandchildren she has? Twelve maybe. She gained 3 or 4 more in the past year. I think the death of Philip is probably more of a factor. And being 96. My parents and grandparents died well before that, and were wobblier with greater cognitive decline.


I don’t think meeting Harry’s baby is something the Queen greatly desires. I think she’s been holding on for her Platinum Jubilee and we’ll see her demise this year.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

Is this supposed to be the outfits that look the same? Different cut completely, not really the same color. And honestly both are hideous but Meghan’s is worse.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: