FCPS NEW SUPERINTENDENT : Michelle Reid

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Let's not forget in 2023. I am not voting for any incumbents. The only one who deserves to be re-elected in McLaughlin - but I can't vote for her, unfortunately.

Stacy Langton in 2023!

Lol!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s with the passive-aggressive email they sent everyone about the “confidentiality of all applicants?”

I assume this was sent to people in FCPS. What was passive aggressive about it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not that Logan sounded good, but Reid sounds absolutely dreadful. It’s like the School Board members just cloned Meren or Cohen, with a dash of Omeish.

Could they please just make Presidio the interim superintendent until there’s a new Board elected to which a qualified permanent replacement might conceivably want to report?

Why does she sound dreadful? Specifics, please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not that Logan sounded good, but Reid sounds absolutely dreadful. It’s like the School Board members just cloned Meren or Cohen, with a dash of Omeish.

Could they please just make Presidio the interim superintendent until there’s a new Board elected to which a qualified permanent replacement might conceivably want to report?

Sounds more dreadful than Logan to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not that Logan sounded good, but Reid sounds absolutely dreadful. It’s like the School Board members just cloned Meren or Cohen, with a dash of Omeish.

Could they please just make Presidio the interim superintendent until there’s a new Board elected to which a qualified permanent replacement might conceivably want to report?

Why does she sound dreadful? Specifics, please.

Yes, why dreadful? She was named superintendent of the year by EdWeek. I think this is just part of the campaign by those trying to attack public education. It doesn’t matter what schools do, this right wing campaign will attack them since dismantling public education is the goal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not that Logan sounded good, but Reid sounds absolutely dreadful. It’s like the School Board members just cloned Meren or Cohen, with a dash of Omeish.

Could they please just make Presidio the interim superintendent until there’s a new Board elected to which a qualified permanent replacement might conceivably want to report?

Why does she sound dreadful? Specifics, please.

More equity babble except the Pacific NW variety is especially virulent.

https://www.nsd.org/our-district/who-we-are/racial-educational-justice

Reid should stay put in Washington State.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not that Logan sounded good, but Reid sounds absolutely dreadful. It’s like the School Board members just cloned Meren or Cohen, with a dash of Omeish.

Could they please just make Presidio the interim superintendent until there’s a new Board elected to which a qualified permanent replacement might conceivably want to report?

Why does she sound dreadful? Specifics, please.

More equity babble except the Pacific NW variety is especially virulent.

https://www.nsd.org/our-district/who-we-are/racial-educational-justice

Reid should stay put in Washington State.

You have lost your mind. Seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s with the passive-aggressive email they sent everyone about the “confidentiality of all applicants?”

I assume this was sent to people in FCPS. What was passive aggressive about it?

I'm not the PP - but they're saying it to the public - we are not the ones with the confidentiality obligation.

[Anonymous]

I just don't know what they said. The cat is out of the bag, so I am not sure what the point was, other than to show they did something. Frankly I think is sucks that whoever was on the panel that violated confidentiality did what they did and that the NAACP decided to do their thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not that Logan sounded good, but Reid sounds absolutely dreadful. It’s like the School Board members just cloned Meren or Cohen, with a dash of Omeish.

Could they please just make Presidio the interim superintendent until there’s a new Board elected to which a qualified permanent replacement might conceivably want to report?

Why does she sound dreadful? Specifics, please.

More equity babble except the Pacific NW variety is especially virulent.

https://www.nsd.org/our-district/who-we-are/racial-educational-justice

Reid should stay put in Washington State.

You have lost your mind. Seriously.

You do know many families in her current district are cheering for her to get the job in FCPS, right? And that even the Fairfax NAACP said she was unqualified for the FCPS position?

[Anonymous]

She's clearly qualified. Will she be the next superintendent, will she be good. Wee don't know, but she is more than qualified. And the NAACP obviously has a narrow focus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not that Logan sounded good, but Reid sounds absolutely dreadful. It’s like the School Board members just cloned Meren or Cohen, with a dash of Omeish.

Could they please just make Presidio the interim superintendent until there’s a new Board elected to which a qualified permanent replacement might conceivably want to report?

Why does she sound dreadful? Specifics, please.

Yes, why dreadful? She was named superintendent of the year by EdWeek. I think this is just part of the campaign by those trying to attack public education. It doesn’t matter what schools do, this right wing campaign will attack them since dismantling public education is the goal.

So you’re saying the Fairfax NAACP is a tool of a right-wing campaign to discredit public education?

You must traffic in conspiracy theories. NO to Reid!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not that Logan sounded good, but Reid sounds absolutely dreadful. It’s like the School Board members just cloned Meren or Cohen, with a dash of Omeish.

Could they please just make Presidio the interim superintendent until there’s a new Board elected to which a qualified permanent replacement might conceivably want to report?

Why does she sound dreadful? Specifics, please.

Yes, why dreadful? She was named superintendent of the year by EdWeek. I think this is just part of the campaign by those trying to attack public education. It doesn’t matter what schools do, this right wing campaign will attack them since dismantling public education is the goal.

So you’re saying the Fairfax NAACP is a tool of a right-wing campaign to discredit public education?

You must traffic in conspiracy theories. NO to Reid!

No, I said the complaints about Reid being dreadful are part of the right wing campaign — torpedo anyone who received the job.

The NAACP was in the wrong on its own since it was throwing a tantrum because it didn’t get a seat on the panel. Their action was totally irresponsible and horrible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's clearly qualified. Will she be the next superintendent, will she be good. Wee don't know, but she is more than qualified. And the NAACP obviously has a narrow focus.

So the NAACP “obviously” has a “narrow focus”?

Do tell - and be sure to dispense with the euphemisms so it’s clear you’re implying that they only cared about a Black woman getting the job and their detailed, stated concerns that Reid had no relevant experience in a large school district like FCPS were just a pretext.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been in a position to work with NAACP leadership, or should I say try to work with them, on a variety of educational issues. My experience has been there is no reasonable discussion, as they have their mind set on perceptions and not realities. And whatever the national trend is that is how everything is perceived, without any real exploration of what is in front of them. There are many adjustments to policies I favor, and wanted to explore real data and develop plans. They wanted nothing to do with it. They have all the answers on hiring, school discipline, adjustments to funding, etc. Ad hominem attacks are what they offered when a real conversation and collaboration were offered. They force themselves into the room, but marginalize themselves because if one does not agree with every premise, they are dismissed. And I was a dues paying member of the NAACP for many years, so my goals were not disimilar to theirs.

I'm just saying, it sounds like you had your mind set on certain end results or positions too. So that goes both ways.

+1000. She definitely has a strong bias towards appointing Reid and declaring "mission accomplished."

And I get how Reid might seem qualified, depending on what boxes you think you need to check. I happen to think she'd be a disaster because she's clearly heavily invested in "equity" and "anti-racist" initiatives that rely heavily on babble and reject the idea of academic merit, and has no experience with a large school system that has the day-to-day operating challenges that FCPS faces (and Brabrand mostly ignored for the last five years).

If she were to step aside, and FCPS were to go back to the drawing board, that would be far preferable to hiring someone who's not right for the job simply because they have a timeline.