Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amicus filing to the Appeals court:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Fh3mRD4Qp4IlNSMX88FoNgaZmbtm2DrO/view

It sort of blows Fokker out of the water.

Were they invited to file one? Doubt it will be accepted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amicus filing to the Appeals court:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Fh3mRD4Qp4IlNSMX88FoNgaZmbtm2DrO/view

It sort of blows Fokker out of the water.

Were they invited to file one? Doubt it will be accepted.

Yes. They were invited.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amicus filing to the Appeals court:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Fh3mRD4Qp4IlNSMX88FoNgaZmbtm2DrO/view

It sort of blows Fokker out of the water.

Were they invited to file one? Doubt it will be accepted.

Yes. They were invited.

Where? I didn't see an invitation to them, in the Appeals Court order. Only Sullivan and DOJ.

[Anonymous]

For our friends on the right, this is how the GOP operates, so you understand how you are being lied to and inflamed to bring half truths and misleading information to boards like this and to your "outraged" conversations.

This is the CBS tweet/report from earlier this month:

Understand the difference between what the DOJ has and controls, versus what the DNI has and controls. DOJ= Barr and DNI= Grenell (until today).

Richard Grenell released the list of "unmaskers" which actually had nothing to do with the Kislyak call that resulted in Flynn's guilty plea.

Why? Because it wasn't an IC product, it was an FBI product. They released this list to gaslight you. And you have carried the lie to twitter, to this forum, to Facebook and to your personal conversations.

All based on lies and half-truths.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For our friends on the right, this is how the GOP operates, so you understand how you are being lied to and inflamed to bring half truths and misleading information to boards like this and to your "outraged" conversations.

This is the CBS tweet/report from earlier this month:

Understand the difference between what the DOJ has and controls, versus what the DNI has and controls. DOJ= Barr and DNI= Grenell (until today).

Richard Grenell released the list of "unmaskers" which actually had nothing to do with the Kislyak call that resulted in Flynn's guilty plea.

Why? Because it wasn't an IC product, it was an FBI product. They released this list to gaslight you. And you have carried the lie to twitter, to this forum, to Facebook and to your personal conversations.

All based on lies and half-truths.

Sad

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For our friends on the right, this is how the GOP operates, so you understand how you are being lied to and inflamed to bring half truths and misleading information to boards like this and to your "outraged" conversations.

This is the CBS tweet/report from earlier this month:

Understand the difference between what the DOJ has and controls, versus what the DNI has and controls. DOJ= Barr and DNI= Grenell (until today).

Richard Grenell released the list of "unmaskers" which actually had nothing to do with the Kislyak call that resulted in Flynn's guilty plea.

Why? Because it wasn't an IC product, it was an FBI product. They released this list to gaslight you. And you have carried the lie to twitter, to this forum, to Facebook and to your personal conversations.

All based on lies and half-truths.

To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1) FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly." If this were leaked, it is illegal. 2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For our friends on the right, this is how the GOP operates, so you understand how you are being lied to and inflamed to bring half truths and misleading information to boards like this and to your "outraged" conversations.

This is the CBS tweet/report from earlier this month:

Understand the difference between what the DOJ has and controls, versus what the DNI has and controls. DOJ= Barr and DNI= Grenell (until today).

Richard Grenell released the list of "unmaskers" which actually had nothing to do with the Kislyak call that resulted in Flynn's guilty plea.

Why? Because it wasn't an IC product, it was an FBI product. They released this list to gaslight you. And you have carried the lie to twitter, to this forum, to Facebook and to your personal conversations.

All based on lies and half-truths.

To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1) FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly." If this were leaked, it is illegal. 2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad

It was leaked. And it is illegal.
And, it seems, by more than one person........

Entous’ reporting on the Flynn-Kislyak conversations became more prevalent after the FBI’s fateful Jan. 24, 2017 interview of Flynn at the White House. On Feb. 9, 2017, Entous and other Washington Post reporters wrote that Flynn discussed sanctions against Russia during the Trump transition period, “contrary to public assertions by Trump officials.”

These sources – nine current and former U.S. officials – stated that Flynn’s “references to the election-related sanctions were explicit.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For our friends on the right, this is how the GOP operates, so you understand how you are being lied to and inflamed to bring half truths and misleading information to boards like this and to your "outraged" conversations.

This is the CBS tweet/report from earlier this month:

Understand the difference between what the DOJ has and controls, versus what the DNI has and controls. DOJ= Barr and DNI= Grenell (until today).

Richard Grenell released the list of "unmaskers" which actually had nothing to do with the Kislyak call that resulted in Flynn's guilty plea.

Why? Because it wasn't an IC product, it was an FBI product. They released this list to gaslight you. And you have carried the lie to twitter, to this forum, to Facebook and to your personal conversations.

All based on lies and half-truths.

To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1) FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly." If this were leaked, it is illegal. 2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad

It was leaked. And it is illegal.
And, it seems, by more than one person........

Entous’ reporting on the Flynn-Kislyak conversations became more prevalent after the FBI’s fateful Jan. 24, 2017 interview of Flynn at the White House. On Feb. 9, 2017, Entous and other Washington Post reporters wrote that Flynn discussed sanctions against Russia during the Trump transition period, “contrary to public assertions by Trump officials.”

These sources – nine current and former U.S. officials – stated that Flynn’s “references to the election-related sanctions were explicit.”

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-michael-flynn-russia-divisions-opinion

[Anonymous]

Hmmm..... Seems that Jensen must have identified some issues.

[Anonymous]

These sources – nine current and former U.S. officials – stated that Flynn’s “references to the election-related sanctions were explicit.”

So, let's see the transcripts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm..... Seems that Jensen must have identified some issues.

Sounds like Wray is “doing something” and gonna still be doing it into mid/late November. Then they’ll find nothing illegal occurred and recommend improvements moving forward.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm..... Seems that Jensen must have identified some issues.

Maybe he'll find Pientka's original 302.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1) FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly." If this were leaked, it is illegal. 2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad

Agreed on the first point.

The bolded is so hysterically misguided and false, I don't even know where to begin.

[Anonymous]

And now, the GOP AGs from around the country are filing an Amicus brief to the appellate court opposing, wait for it, amicus briefs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1) FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly." If this were leaked, it is illegal. 2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad

Agreed on the first point.

The bolded is so hysterically misguided and false, I don't even know where to begin.

Agree.
News flash: if you talk to foreign agents, you’re being recorded. The Trump team was too stupid to know better. Flynn really baffles me. Not the traitor part, but the imbecility.