Reply to Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For our friends on the right, this is how the GOP operates, so you understand how you are being lied to and inflamed to bring half truths and misleading information to boards like this and to your "outraged" conversations.

This is the CBS tweet/report from earlier this month:

[twitter]https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1260635048967094272[/twitter]

Understand the difference between what the DOJ has and controls, versus what the DNI has and controls. DOJ= Barr and DNI= Grenell (until today).

Richard Grenell released the list of "unmaskers" which actually had nothing to do with the Kislyak call that resulted in Flynn's guilty plea.

Why? Because it wasn't an IC product, it was an FBI product. They released this list to gaslight you. And you have carried the lie to twitter, to this forum, to Facebook and to your personal conversations.

All based on lies and half-truths.[/quote]

To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1)[b] FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly."  If this were leaked, it is illegal.[/b]  2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad[/quote][/quote]

It was leaked.  And it is illegal. 
And, it seems, by more than one person........

Entous’ reporting on the Flynn-Kislyak conversations became more prevalent after the FBI’s fateful Jan. 24, 2017 interview of Flynn at the White House. On Feb. 9, 2017, Entous and other Washington Post reporters wrote that Flynn discussed sanctions against Russia during the Trump transition period, “contrary to public assertions by Trump officials.”

These sources – nine current and former U.S. officials – stated that Flynn’s “references to the election-related sanctions were explicit.”
[/quote]

Source:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-michael-flynn-russia-divisions-opinion[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics