Fairfax County Double Murder

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please summarize the almost 90 pages of this thread for me? Thanks!


Hahahahaha. Good one.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:3 recent and notorious VA cases, all centered on F&tlife, this one, Eleanor Hoppe (offered a plea deal last week) and the VA politician.

Sex between consulting adults should not be a lure that ends in death. RIP Christine and Joe.


Which VA politician?

Does anyone know the user names? I’ll look up the profiles



Anyone have a link to the bond reports?


Do you mean Juliana's bond hearing? You can go get a copy in person, they do not release online.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
As far as for the way that Magalhaes’ lawyer said Banfield and Ryan met and knew each other, prosecutors said that someone other than Banfield set up an account on a fetish website and that Ryan responded to it. They added that it was part of a plan that would allow Magalhaes and Banfield’s husband to end up together.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/affairs-fetish-activity-alleged-at-hearing-for-au-pair-charged-in-reston-murder-fairfax-county-judge-denies-bond/ar-AA1iXH1m

At a recent press conference LE said CB and JR were known to one another. Separate assertion.


10-4. I missed that detail. It just keeps getting weirder.


Thank you


It's all creepy and nefarious. Very https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Winger.

I hope that LE will be able to make strong cases against both BB and AP.

Of note, multiple friends of JR said he had only recently "met" the Banfields. This may be something CB had not done previously that she was coerced into by BB, perhaps linked to his birthday, but really just a ruse for murder. It's horrible to consider that but it is possible and clearly an intent was to smear CB and JR in death, as AP and BB's mothers have actively done. JR and CB had one understanding, but they were mislead, set up, dehumanized and murdered.


I wonder if the police have evidence that BB researched the Mark Winger case. I can see him thinking “Great idea, and I’m too smart to make the missteps he did.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please summarize the almost 90 pages of this thread for me? Thanks!


Suspects:
BB = Father, 38, federal law enforcement officer
AP = Au pair, 23, on a work visa from Brazil

Victims:
CB = Mother, 37, nurse
JR = Lured to residence, 39, unknown occupation

Relevant Others:
DD = Daughter of BB and CB, 4

Known facts:
BB and CB were married. BB and CB were parents to DD. AP was their live-in au pair. They lived in Herndon where, on the morning of February 24, CB was stabbed and JR was shot. CB was pronounced at the hospital. JR was pronounced at the residence. There was no forced entry. BB and AP had been having a sexual relationship for at least a period of 2-3 months prior to the murders. On October 27, AP was arrested after dropping off DD at the bus stop. AP has been charged with second degree murder for shooting JR. AP is being held without bond due to her flight risk as a Brazilian national, a recently-renewed Brazilian passport, and a near-expired work visa. No one is yet charged with the murder of CB.

Alleged facts according to AP:
The morning of the murders, AP left with DD at 7:00 AM because CB gave them tickets to the zoo. AP turned around because she forgot DD's lunch. While AP was gone, BB encountered JR stabbing CB. BB shot JR with his service-issued sidearm. At around the same time, AP returned to the residence. BB instructed AP to retrieve one of his own personal sidearms because JR was still moving. AP returned with the personal sidearm and shot JR again.

Alleged facts according to the commonwealth:
JR corresponded with a user on fetlife who invited him to the Herndon residence. While the fetlife user had the likeness of CB, the commonwealth alleges that the fetlife account was created by "another adult" in the home other than CB. The commonwealth acknowledges that CB and JR were known to each other, but have not elaborated on the exact nature of that connection. After the murders, AP not only kept living in the residence but also moved into the primary bedroom. BB and AP continued their relationship with AP taking on woman-of-the-house duties.

Alleged facts according to DCUM:
BB had been unfaithful to CB before AP. BB is keeping DD away from her maternal grandparents. BB and AP are murderous scumbag whackadoos.

Sources:
This thread
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/virginia/nanny-charged-murder-denied-bond-brazil-passport/65-a76c7728-3e74-46e5-ad73-4ac3681ac847
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/au-pair-charged-months-man-fatally-shot-woman-stabbed-death-virginia-h-rcna121542
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/1-dead-1-seriously-injured-after-shooting-and-stabbing-in-fairfax-county-police/3286403/
Anonymous
Well done, PP, that's it in a nutshell.

I'd add, AP is in custody and is charged with second degree murder, it's possible that if she becomes cooperative she may be offered a plea deal.

BB is said to be on leave from his IRS LE job.

AP was denied bond as a flight risk, next hearing in January.

Similarities to Mark Winger case, check out wiki.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Well done, PP, that's it in a nutshell.

I'd add, AP is in custody and is charged with second degree murder, it's possible that if she becomes cooperative she may be offered a plea deal.

BB is said to be on leave from his IRS LE job.

AP was denied bond as a flight risk, next hearing in January.

Similarities to Mark Winger case, check out wiki.


Great summary.

Minor correction to known facts. I believe AP was arrested on 10/13.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please summarize the almost 90 pages of this thread for me? Thanks!


Suspects:
BB = Father, 38, federal law enforcement officer
AP = Au pair, 23, on a work visa from Brazil

Victims:
CB = Mother, 37, nurse
JR = Lured to residence, 39, unknown occupation

Relevant Others:
DD = Daughter of BB and CB, 4

Known facts:
BB and CB were married. BB and CB were parents to DD. AP was their live-in au pair. They lived in Herndon where, on the morning of February 24, CB was stabbed and JR was shot. CB was pronounced at the hospital. JR was pronounced at the residence. There was no forced entry. BB and AP had been having a sexual relationship for at least a period of 2-3 months prior to the murders. On October 27, AP was arrested after dropping off DD at the bus stop. AP has been charged with second degree murder for shooting JR. AP is being held without bond due to her flight risk as a Brazilian national, a recently-renewed Brazilian passport, and a near-expired work visa. No one is yet charged with the murder of CB.

Alleged facts according to AP:
The morning of the murders, AP left with DD at 7:00 AM because CB gave them tickets to the zoo. AP turned around because she forgot DD's lunch. While AP was gone, BB encountered JR stabbing CB. BB shot JR with his service-issued sidearm. At around the same time, AP returned to the residence. BB instructed AP to retrieve one of his own personal sidearms because JR was still moving. AP returned with the personal sidearm and shot JR again.

Alleged facts according to the commonwealth:
JR corresponded with a user on fetlife who invited him to the Herndon residence. While the fetlife user had the likeness of CB, the commonwealth alleges that the fetlife account was created by "another adult" in the home other than CB. The commonwealth acknowledges that CB and JR were known to each other, but have not elaborated on the exact nature of that connection. After the murders, AP not only kept living in the residence but also moved into the primary bedroom. BB and AP continued their relationship with AP taking on woman-of-the-house duties.

Alleged facts according to DCUM:
BB had been unfaithful to CB before AP. BB is keeping DD away from her maternal grandparents. BB and AP are murderous scumbag whackadoos.

Sources:
This thread
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/virginia/nanny-charged-murder-denied-bond-brazil-passport/65-a76c7728-3e74-46e5-ad73-4ac3681ac847
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/au-pair-charged-months-man-fatally-shot-woman-stabbed-death-virginia-h-rcna121542
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/1-dead-1-seriously-injured-after-shooting-and-stabbing-in-fairfax-county-police/3286403/


Anyone else mentally adding the Law & Order “DUN-DUN” after reading this? Thank you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please summarize the almost 90 pages of this thread for me? Thanks!


Suspects:
BB = Father, 38, federal law enforcement officer
AP = Au pair, 23, on a work visa from Brazil

Victims:
CB = Mother, 37, nurse
JR = Lured to residence, 39, unknown occupation

Relevant Others:
DD = Daughter of BB and CB, 4

Known facts:
BB and CB were married. BB and CB were parents to DD. AP was their live-in au pair. They lived in Herndon where, on the morning of February 24, CB was stabbed and JR was shot. CB was pronounced at the hospital. JR was pronounced at the residence. There was no forced entry. BB and AP had been having a sexual relationship for at least a period of 2-3 months prior to the murders. On October 27, AP was arrested after dropping off DD at the bus stop. AP has been charged with second degree murder for shooting JR. AP is being held without bond due to her flight risk as a Brazilian national, a recently-renewed Brazilian passport, and a near-expired work visa. No one is yet charged with the murder of CB.

Alleged facts according to AP:
The morning of the murders, AP left with DD at 7:00 AM because CB gave them tickets to the zoo. AP turned around because she forgot DD's lunch. While AP was gone, BB encountered JR stabbing CB. BB shot JR with his service-issued sidearm. At around the same time, AP returned to the residence. BB instructed AP to retrieve one of his own personal sidearms because JR was still moving. AP returned with the personal sidearm and shot JR again.

Alleged facts according to the commonwealth:
JR corresponded with a user on fetlife who invited him to the Herndon residence. While the fetlife user had the likeness of CB, the commonwealth alleges that the fetlife account was created by "another adult" in the home other than CB. The commonwealth acknowledges that CB and JR were known to each other, but have not elaborated on the exact nature of that connection. After the murders, AP not only kept living in the residence but also moved into the primary bedroom. BB and AP continued their relationship with AP taking on woman-of-the-house duties.

Alleged facts according to DCUM:
BB had been unfaithful to CB before AP. BB is keeping DD away from her maternal grandparents. BB and AP are murderous scumbag whackadoos.

Sources:
This thread
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/virginia/nanny-charged-murder-denied-bond-brazil-passport/65-a76c7728-3e74-46e5-ad73-4ac3681ac847
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/au-pair-charged-months-man-fatally-shot-woman-stabbed-death-virginia-h-rcna121542
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/1-dead-1-seriously-injured-after-shooting-and-stabbing-in-fairfax-county-police/3286403/


Anyone else mentally adding the Law & Order “DUN-DUN” after reading this? Thank you.


🙋🏼‍♂️
Anonymous
I didn’t realize until this summary that AP says that while she was gone BB encountered JR stabbing CB. I thought she encountered. And doesn’t the LE have proof that BB didn’t arrive until after?

Has LE concluded that CB didn’t create the fetish account. I know we all speculate that but has LE concluded?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I didn’t realize until this summary that AP says that while she was gone BB encountered JR stabbing CB. I thought she encountered. And doesn’t the LE have proof that BB didn’t arrive until after?

Has LE concluded that CB didn’t create the fetish account. I know we all speculate that but has LE concluded?


PP here who wrote the summary. I think we're both sort of right. AP saw JR enter the home, however it seems that BB was the first to physically encounter. The commonwealth seems very certain that someone other than CB created the fetlife user.

Magalhaes said she forgot the child’s lunch and went back to the house to get it. When she did, she said she [saw] Ryan pull up and go into the house. Magalhaes said she called Banfield’s husband who told her to wait and he would come home. Magalhaes’ lawyer said Magalhaes went into the house with Banfield’s husband and took the 4-year-old child to the basement. She supposedly dialed 911 at that point but didn’t know what to say to the emergency dispatcher, so she hung up. The lawyer said Magalhaes left the basement and that she and Banfield’s husband heard some sort of interaction involving Banfield and Ryan above them. They weren’t sure if it was consensual or not. Magalhaes said Banfield’s husband, who is a special agent for the IRS, pulled out his service weapon and went into the bedroom where he saw Ryan with a knife to Banfield’s throat.

As far as for the way that Magalhaes’ lawyer said Banfield and Ryan met and knew each other, prosecutors said that someone other than Banfield set up an account on a fetish website and that Ryan responded to it. They added that it was part of a plan that would allow Magalhaes and Banfield’s husband to end up together.


Sources
https://www.dcnewsnow.com/news/local-news/virginia/fairfax-county/defense-prosecution-outline-adult-relationships-activities-at-hearing-for-au-pair-charged-in-reston-murder-fairfax-county-judge-denies-bond/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I didn’t realize until this summary that AP says that while she was gone BB encountered JR stabbing CB. I thought she encountered. And doesn’t the LE have proof that BB didn’t arrive until after?

Has LE concluded that CB didn’t create the fetish account. I know we all speculate that but has LE concluded?


PP here who wrote the summary. I think we're both sort of right. AP saw JR enter the home, however it seems that BB was the first to physically encounter. The commonwealth seems very certain that someone other than CB created the fetlife user.

Magalhaes said she forgot the child’s lunch and went back to the house to get it. When she did, she said she [saw] Ryan pull up and go into the house. Magalhaes said she called Banfield’s husband who told her to wait and he would come home. Magalhaes’ lawyer said Magalhaes went into the house with Banfield’s husband and took the 4-year-old child to the basement. She supposedly dialed 911 at that point but didn’t know what to say to the emergency dispatcher, so she hung up. The lawyer said Magalhaes left the basement and that she and Banfield’s husband heard some sort of interaction involving Banfield and Ryan above them. They weren’t sure if it was consensual or not. Magalhaes said Banfield’s husband, who is a special agent for the IRS, pulled out his service weapon and went into the bedroom where he saw Ryan with a knife to Banfield’s throat.

As far as for the way that Magalhaes’ lawyer said Banfield and Ryan met and knew each other, prosecutors said that someone other than Banfield set up an account on a fetish website and that Ryan responded to it. They added that it was part of a plan that would allow Magalhaes and Banfield’s husband to end up together.


Sources
https://www.dcnewsnow.com/news/local-news/virginia/fairfax-county/defense-prosecution-outline-adult-relationships-activities-at-hearing-for-au-pair-charged-in-reston-murder-fairfax-county-judge-denies-bond/


My understanding of the story is different. She called BB when she returned home. She said she saw an unknown car at the house and he came right back home. They all three went into the house/basement together and they heard something going on. Then BB went up and confronted JR.
Anonymous
AP’s story doesn’t make sense. Why would you go into the basement? That’s not where the lunch is, and if you think something is fishy about the strange car/man, you shouldn’t bring the kid into the house. There’s also no reason to assume Christine or the stranger would be in the basement that early in the morning. The natural place to look for her is first on the main floor, then upstairs, then basement last.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:AP’s story doesn’t make sense. Why would you go into the basement? That’s not where the lunch is, and if you think something is fishy about the strange car/man, you shouldn’t bring the kid into the house. There’s also no reason to assume Christine or the stranger would be in the basement that early in the morning. The natural place to look for her is first on the main floor, then upstairs, then basement last.


I agree but arguably they went in the basement b/c they thought it was safer. She didn't go in to get the lunch at that point- she already saw a strange car in the driveway.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:AP’s story doesn’t make sense. Why would you go into the basement? That’s not where the lunch is, and if you think something is fishy about the strange car/man, you shouldn’t bring the kid into the house. There’s also no reason to assume Christine or the stranger would be in the basement that early in the morning. The natural place to look for her is first on the main floor, then upstairs, then basement last.


I agree but arguably they went in the basement b/c they thought it was safer. She didn't go in to get the lunch at that point- she already saw a strange car in the driveway.


I think a lot of people are missing what the intended “set up” by BB and AuPair. I’m sure their story is that AuPair called BB about the strange car bc he told her “he suspected an affair”. In their retelling, they weren’t saying they went into the house scared, just that BB went into confront affair partner. That’s why all this speculation about her entering the house isn’t what you would do when scared, doesn’t matter. Or whether she went to the basement or should have gone to the kitchen to make lunch, ect. shouldn’t be part of the speculation/narrative.
Anonymous
This.

It's why the "story" made no sense to Joe's friends who posted on this board and elsewhere, how could she be "scared" of a "strange car" when he had been there before? The nonsensical story is the lead up to the set up. Or the set up to the set up.

Two people are dead and a little girl has lost her mommy and at least for now, much of her extended family, and for what?

Them being dumb is not a guarantee that there will be accountability. We can hope.
post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: