Official Abortion Thread
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
You know, at this point I am just about ready to let the evangelicals win their "abortion ban and instead work to help all other women. The 'gelicals can then loose their daughters or have their daughters become permanently damaged while they are getting abortions in dark alleys pretending to their parents they aren't having sex. And i'm all for obgyns refusing to use IVF and fertility treatments with evangelicals who don't believe they should play God with abortions. |
Anonymous
Haha. You totally missed what I was trying to say. No, I don't feel entitled to any of that-that's why nobody else but me has a say on the decision to have or not have a baby. |
Anonymous
You're saying you'd force women to sit on their eggs if they'd been fertilized? |
Anonymous
Well, think about it -- if you're gonna strut around the yard wearing those fine feathers, you gotta expect to end up sitting on an egg. |
Anonymous
|
A new study shows that people who are denied abortions are nearly 4 times as likely to live below the federal poverty line four years later as those who had abortions.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/women-denied-abortions-in-financial-distress-years-later-study-finds/ |
Anonymous
Take a look at the infant mortality rate in the US. If the right cared so much about babies, why would they so many women and babies die by denying them better healthcare? |
Anonymous
| The Supreme Court has already decided this. Why are some people trying overturn the vote? |
Anonymous
...would they let... |
Anonymous
Ouch! |
Anonymous
Joe Biden: "Wait! I don't have a uterus, so this really isn't any of my business one way or the other!" |
Anonymous
Funny how you assume it’d be the woman. I’d assume the rich would hire some one to do it, the middle class parents would take turns, and the poor would sell the eggs for drugs or McDonald’s. Eventually, the government would step in and take unwanted fertilized eggs into their custody and raise as future soldiers for military. In fact, I suppose that could be done now with unwanted babies, couldn’t it? Solves both issues. Let’s Pubs feel moral about not killing unwanted fetuses and let’s Dems support women’s right to choose. Kinda stormtrooper like. |
Anonymous
Because they want to hurt women. They’ve already fcked the US, now they want to fck women. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/02/us/politics/republicans-abortion-supreme-court.html |
Anonymous
|
I’m a liberal and very pro choice but am so tired of the abortion issue. I’d be willing to trade it away for something like universal health care at this point.
The issue is this: give the evangelicals etc what they want (make abortion illegal) and it isn’t as if they are going to quit this shit and start voting Dem. They’ll just move onto the next “issue”- who knows what that will be- birth control? I think they “say” - oh I can’t vote Dem abortion is the top issue waaaah- but that is just a cover IMO. They don’t want to pay any more for actual pro life issues like healthcare or welfare programs either- when it truly comes down to it. They’ll gin up some other issue that “forces them to vote GOP- cuz morals!” to avoid looking bad for not wanting to fund public programs.. |
Anonymous
| Which is exactly why you can't "trade the issue of abortion" away. Abortion rights are very closely tied in with health care. I often wonder why virulent pro-lifers aren't also virulent pro-gun control legislation. |
Anonymous
+1 They will find other ways to punish others. |