She picked Tim

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so weird how magas keep posting shit from Joey Mannarino, the guy who got caught pretending to be a black woman on Twitter because he was too stupid to switch accounts.

This is who you have telling you what to think?

lol-is that who he is? That guy is dumb as rocks. If that’s the conservative thought leader, the GOP is in even more trouble than I thought

Well, he's no Ben Shapiro

Have you ever listened to Ben Shapiro? You may not like what he has to say, but he’s very bright. And quite sharp.

He's a dumb person's idea of a smart person. Also, he looks funny. Head down, constantly bobbing.

I think Harvard Law probably disagrees with you. As would UCLA and Phi Beta Kappa. Where did you go to school?

Like Walz, I went to a state college. I'm all for a good education, but book learning isn't everything.

NP. It's always funny to see the party that decries elitism constantly fall back in Ivy credentials, like Harvard has never produced a dumb person.

Harvard allowed Charles Kuschner to buy Jared's way into Harvard with a $2.5M donation weeks before Jared was admitted. Not the first time that a wealthy parent was able to get a mediocre student admitted to Harvard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The SEC voters won’t be impressed.

By "SEC voters" do you mean conservative White men? Because plenty of voters in SEC states will be impressed.

Citation?

Video of Kamala Harris' rally in Atlanta.

You think Walz is going to have appeal throughout the US?

Absolutely. I myself am a Midwestern dad and that personality plays everywhere.

Dcum hates midwestern people. They malign midwestern people as fat, dumb, racist, backward hicks. Rubes.

Yet somehow Walz is absolutely fantastic because he embodies midwestern values and personality.

Hmmmm.

There is a thread about this right now. How much the Midwest sucks. This is indeed an intriguing observation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The SEC voters won’t be impressed.

By "SEC voters" do you mean conservative White men? Because plenty of voters in SEC states will be impressed.

Citation?

Video of Kamala Harris' rally in Atlanta.

You think Walz is going to have appeal throughout the US?

Absolutely. I’m as waspy elite as they come. Walz is nothing like me. But he has a record of public service that goes back decades and the anecdotes coming out about him show an authentic person who cares about making people’s lives better.

So while I might not agree on every policy point, he adds to a ticket that puts country over personal enrichment. I don’t care to have my tax dollars go into the private pockets of grifters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

This. Feeling politically homeless right now. I can’t bring myself to vote for either extreme so will probably sit this one out.

I don't believe you are what you say you are. But, even if you view this as a "lesser evil" situation (it's not, Harris/Walz is a good option); but even if you viewed it as a "lesser evil" situation, the moral thing to do is to vote in a way that helps protect your friends and neighbors from the greater evil.

I’m the PP and truly can’t believe what I just read. You’re lecturing me on who is a “good option” here, as if I couldn’t possibly make my own decision? Then telling me what the “moral thing” to do is? Not sure if you’re aware, but your sanctimony is exactly what makes me not interested in voting for the Ds. Not a Trump voter, but definitely not a Harris voter either. Lots of us out there, but do stay safe in your echo chamber.

MAGA loser: Keep working that “Oh, why bother voting, there’s no point”-thing. Direct from Putin!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so weird how magas keep posting shit from Joey Mannarino, the guy who got caught pretending to be a black woman on Twitter because he was too stupid to switch accounts.

This is who you have telling you what to think?

lol-is that who he is? That guy is dumb as rocks. If that’s the conservative thought leader, the GOP is in even more trouble than I thought

Well, he's no Ben Shapiro

Have you ever listened to Ben Shapiro? You may not like what he has to say, but he’s very bright. And quite sharp.

He's a dumb person's idea of a smart person. Also, he looks funny. Head down, constantly bobbing.

I think Harvard Law probably disagrees with you. As would UCLA and Phi Beta Kappa. Where did you go to school?

Like Walz, I went to a state college. I'm all for a good education, but book learning isn't everything.

NP. It's always funny to see the party that decries elitism constantly fall back in Ivy credentials, like Harvard has never produced a dumb person.

Harvard allowed Charles Kuschner to buy Jared's way into Harvard with a $2.5M donation weeks before Jared was admitted. Not the first time that a wealthy parent was able to get a mediocre student admitted to Harvard.

Wow! Ben Shapiros parents got him into Harvard with a big donation? I had no idea. This changes everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Live Rally:

Did you see how many people are watching?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

This. Feeling politically homeless right now. I can’t bring myself to vote for either extreme so will probably sit this one out.

I don't believe you are what you say you are. But, even if you view this as a "lesser evil" situation (it's not, Harris/Walz is a good option); but even if you viewed it as a "lesser evil" situation, the moral thing to do is to vote in a way that helps protect your friends and neighbors from the greater evil.

"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."
- Rush

I will only vote for RFK, Jr. if he makes it. If not, I will write in his name.

Yes, clearly that’s the sane and normal choice. 🤦‍♀️

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

This. Feeling politically homeless right now. I can’t bring myself to vote for either extreme so will probably sit this one out.

I don't believe you are what you say you are. But, even if you view this as a "lesser evil" situation (it's not, Harris/Walz is a good option); but even if you viewed it as a "lesser evil" situation, the moral thing to do is to vote in a way that helps protect your friends and neighbors from the greater evil.

"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."
- Rush

I will only vote for RFK, Jr. if he makes it. If not, I will write in his name.

RFK jr is unbearable!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

This. Feeling politically homeless right now. I can’t bring myself to vote for either extreme so will probably sit this one out.

I don't believe you are what you say you are. But, even if you view this as a "lesser evil" situation (it's not, Harris/Walz is a good option); but even if you viewed it as a "lesser evil" situation, the moral thing to do is to vote in a way that helps protect your friends and neighbors from the greater evil.

I’m the PP and truly can’t believe what I just read. You’re lecturing me on who is a “good option” here, as if I couldn’t possibly make my own decision? Then telling me what the “moral thing” to do is? Not sure if you’re aware, but your sanctimony is exactly what makes me not interested in voting for the Ds. Not a Trump voter, but definitely not a Harris voter either. Lots of us out there, but do stay safe in your echo chamber.

MAGA loser: Keep working that “Oh, why bother voting, there’s no point”-thing. Direct from Putin!

And keep lecturing people on what the “appropriate” morals are. I’m with PP. I cannot believe you have the balls to tell people the proper way to vote.
Well, maybe I can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The SEC voters won’t be impressed.

By "SEC voters" do you mean conservative White men? Because plenty of voters in SEC states will be impressed.

Citation?

Video of Kamala Harris' rally in Atlanta.

You think Walz is going to have appeal throughout the US?

Absolutely. I myself am a Midwestern dad and that personality plays everywhere.

Dcum hates midwestern people. They malign midwestern people as fat, dumb, racist, backward hicks. Rubes.

Yet somehow Walz is absolutely fantastic because he embodies midwestern values and personality.

Hmmmm.

Spot on! I was thinking the same thing. Reminds me of how DCUM (and Democrats in general) were scared to death of Kamala Harris even being on the ticket at all because she was such a liability… until Biden dropped out and then, immediately, she was touted as the most incredible candidate. The Dem Spin is something to behold.

[Anonymous]

Oh, dear. Someone is not well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

This. Feeling politically homeless right now. I can’t bring myself to vote for either extreme so will probably sit this one out.

I don't believe you are what you say you are. But, even if you view this as a "lesser evil" situation (it's not, Harris/Walz is a good option); but even if you viewed it as a "lesser evil" situation, the moral thing to do is to vote in a way that helps protect your friends and neighbors from the greater evil.

I’m the PP and truly can’t believe what I just read. You’re lecturing me on who is a “good option” here, as if I couldn’t possibly make my own decision? Then telling me what the “moral thing” to do is? Not sure if you’re aware, but your sanctimony is exactly what makes me not interested in voting for the Ds. Not a Trump voter, but definitely not a Harris voter either. Lots of us out there, but do stay safe in your echo chamber.

Yes, there are!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

This. Feeling politically homeless right now. I can’t bring myself to vote for either extreme so will probably sit this one out.

I don't believe you are what you say you are. But, even if you view this as a "lesser evil" situation (it's not, Harris/Walz is a good option); but even if you viewed it as a "lesser evil" situation, the moral thing to do is to vote in a way that helps protect your friends and neighbors from the greater evil.

I’m the PP and truly can’t believe what I just read. You’re lecturing me on who is a “good option” here, as if I couldn’t possibly make my own decision? Then telling me what the “moral thing” to do is? Not sure if you’re aware, but your sanctimony is exactly what makes me not interested in voting for the Ds. Not a Trump voter, but definitely not a Harris voter either. Lots of us out there, but do stay safe in your echo chamber.

MAGA loser: Keep working that “Oh, why bother voting, there’s no point”-thing. Direct from Putin!

And keep lecturing people on what the “appropriate” morals are. I’m with PP. I cannot believe you have the balls to tell people the proper way to vote.
Well, maybe I can.

Only that they should vote, whatever way they choose. 450,000 American soldiers died in World War Two so that you could vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

This. Feeling politically homeless right now. I can’t bring myself to vote for either extreme so will probably sit this one out.

I don't believe you are what you say you are. But, even if you view this as a "lesser evil" situation (it's not, Harris/Walz is a good option); but even if you viewed it as a "lesser evil" situation, the moral thing to do is to vote in a way that helps protect your friends and neighbors from the greater evil.

I’m the PP and truly can’t believe what I just read. You’re lecturing me on who is a “good option” here, as if I couldn’t possibly make my own decision? Then telling me what the “moral thing” to do is? Not sure if you’re aware, but your sanctimony is exactly what makes me not interested in voting for the Ds. Not a Trump voter, but definitely not a Harris voter either. Lots of us out there, but do stay safe in your echo chamber.

MAGA loser: Keep working that “Oh, why bother voting, there’s no point”-thing. Direct from Putin!

Thought about reporting your nasty post, but then realized you just made my point for me, yet again. Keep showing us your true colors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tim Walz always puts the toilet seat down.

This makes MAGAs mad because Ben Shapiro tells them that putting the toilet seat down is misandry.

why?

Because real men pee standing up. And being expected to cater to women by putting the seat down afterward is oppression. Evidence that the alpha male is being turned into a beta, exploited by hypergamous women for his resources.

Do you know why alpha males are respected? Because they use their strength and power to take care of the whole troupe. Real alpha males are not narcissistic. Real alpha males put down the toilet seat for the elderly, the pregnant and the young.

True alpha males protect the pack. That includes the young, the females, the elderly and the ill.

Fake alphas, like Trump, make fun of the disabled or handicapped, refuse to protect women and the the ill. And don't want to hear about the young and females. It's truly amazing to me that alpha males would support someone who claims to grab 'em by the pu$$y, will assault women and deny it, cheat on spouses, jeer at the handicapped, and disregard the elderly.

Incels are NOT alpha males. They are bullies that use their masculity to bully and prey upon the weak.