
But the type of show is inherently geared towards older audiences. Young women just aren't interested in learning how to decorate for kids' birthday parties. |
Young women watch all kinds of cooking shows and various stuff on Netflix, especially anything celebrity related. Selena Gomez's cooking show was quite popular with Gen Z, for example |
I'm sure our resident Stacy London here will have an explanation shortly about how that's chic but Meghan's Cartier watch screams nouveau riche and millennial or some shit, idk. |
Selena Gomez's cooking show was just that, a cooking show. The premise was a young celebrity learning to cook, which is appealing to young women. The premise is not "I'm a mom who likes making moments special for my husband and kids." |
Stacy London? Damn. Talk about dated references... you must be over 40. |
Meghan's is a cooking show too, lol. And the point is a cooking show does not imply that it has to feel dated and old and geared towards middle aged people |
DP Are you experiencing a midlife crisis? What is with the hyper fixation on things being dated? I missed the memo where you can't even make an older reference lol. |
The personal insults about millennials are so weird, when, as another poster said, millennials are now too old to care about being trendy. |
It reads as "40 year old mom who desperately wants to be friends with the interns." |
I'm not, but you appear to be going through one whenever anyone points out (rightfully) that your clothing and references are dated. What's wrong with that? You're allowed to proudly walk around in your millennial page and have everyone able to pin your age, in the same way a 65 year old woman can waltz around in their QVC comfort sweatshirt and not be surprised that people pin her for being a grandma. You speak and dress with a very distinctive time/era/middle aged vibe. What's the issue? |
Who is insulting millennials? pointing out that you have aged out of the "hip" demographic into the "old" demographic is not an insult, it's just a fact. And I suspect very few posters on this thread ever started out particularly trendy or in touch with fashion. There are plenty of millennials who appropriately update their fashion and wardrobe every year. But those millennials are likely not spending hours of their day arguing and aggressively defending Meghan Markle on a parenting forum. |
Meghan's target demo is middle aged ladies like herself, not Gen Z. She's selling a super conservative, traditional lifestyle -- basically, being a SAHM to a rich guy. I know a bunch of women who follow her and like this show and they are all wealthy SAHMs in their late 30s or 40s with young kids. It's like a very specific brand of trad wife.
Which, honestly, is fine. I don't get the hate. It's not for me but there is definitely an audience for it. I personally know plenty of women who want to dress like her and like her hostessing tips and like her aesthetic. If there's a misstep in this, it's in the branding (changing the name multiple times was dumb and the new name is still bad) and the lack of products. I looked at her website and she's only selling a few things and it's mostly consumable -- jam and tea. She should be selling some dishes, tea sets, and some of the "hostess items" she makes on the show. I've only seen two episodes but like she could do a candle making kit and a bath sachet kit, for instance. Also trays and other display items. I think that's more the brand of the show than the food items, because isn't the whole deal there that she makes it herself and that's why it's special for guests? So buying some crepe mix or a jar of jam runs counter to what she's selling. She should have brought it a bigger pro for the branding and merchandising, someone who has had success with a celeb brand before. And I think she should have partnered with a retailer. Maybe they tried and it didn't work. She probably wanted something upscale but her best bets would something like Target or maybe Williams Sonoma. Maybe they weren't interested? Target got burned on the Chrissy Teigen thing so I could see them being wary of Meghan. Or maybe she thought that was just too downmarket for her. Anyway, based on the response of friends and family in her target demo, I think it's successful. But missed opportunities in terms of really building out a brand. It almost feels like she's afraid to commit to going full Martha Stewart. But it would actually lend legitimacy to the whole thing. If you can put good, attractive products in people's hands at a decent price, you build loyalty because it makes the whole thing seem more substantial. Alison Roman also went the more bespoke route with her merchandising and it's limited her a lot as well. But Roman can sell cookbooks and is considered more of an expert in cuisine, whereas Meghan's thing is hostessing. Maybe she'll release a book about hostessing. |
Why do you think everyone who responds to you is here for "hours" a day? By your own admission you are the one who has been here for five or six pages. |
Because you guys have very distinctive tells and quirks of speech that make it obvious who you are. But why not answer the question that has been asked several times- how many hours, in total, do you think you spend on this thread per week? Is it over or under ten? |
Why can’t anyone do a practical yet aspirational cooking/home show? I’m sure there is one out there but I don’t know it. Jacques Pepin has a ‘fast food’ cook book that I like. Fast takes on elevated recipes. 20 something year olds don’t have time to make their own candles, nor do I (millennial) but 20 year dc and I would both happily watch a show that helped us make nice meals with short cuts like frozen veggies, canned blah blah. I don’t typically have time to go harvest my own honey when making a meal for the day. |