ha that's great!
I'm a school librarian with lots of thoughts on this. |
No. It’s about sexual content. Why not put hustler in the school library if you are a free speech absolutist? And please spare us the nonsense that book banning is only coming from one side. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/11/03/to-kill-a-mockingbird-book-ban-removal-washington/ |
And you support banning the Bible in school libraries, correct? If not you are a hypocrite. |
Librarians carefully curate collections. It’s what they’re hired to do.
There’s no hustler in schools and you know that but can’t stop Catastrophizing to promote your Christian evangelical agenda. We see you. |
|
+1 |
Of course. As an atheist I believe that no religion should be promoted to children in public schools. I notice that you didn’t respond to my question. Why not provide hustler to your kids in school, you support that right? Or perhaps you’re the hypocrite. |
Im an atheist, I’m not what Christian agenda you are referring to. Sounds to me like you do support banning certain materials in schools. |
Awfully quiet in here. |
+1 Liberals can't bear being called out as hypocrites. They will not respond to the banning of "To Kill A Mockingbird." They'll just ignore it, while continuing to insist that graphically sexual books should be available in public school libraries. Liberal = hypocrite. |
Completely agree. But There are also a lot of bad faith trolls who are desperate for the state to provide sexual material to other people’s children so I’m sure they will return soon. |
That’s not banning. |