It depends. If one of the sections is extremely low and the other twos are high enough it might deserve another look. If the 3 sections are pretty much the same then probably don’t bother to parent refer… |
Ours is 122 at 90, 90, and 81 in quantitative. Worth applying especially if NNAT was good |
| Honestly, we’re all just speculating here. If you are concerned about your kid’s score talk to his teacher. Do not let anyone here dissuade you from applying if you want your kid in AAP. The application process is a bit of a black box and no one really knows the formula because it doesn’t exist. |
No score means automatic admission-if you read the results threads here on DCUM every year some kids with 145+ scores are rejected. It’s holistic, but I suspect in those cases the teacher evaluation and work samples were weaker. |
96th is still very strong. I think that person is referring to very lopsided scores like 99/50. |
| If the elementary school is a lower income school, and the kid will likely have a strong HOPE, then a 120 is probably good enough. If the AART and teachers think your kid belongs in AAP and make a strong packet for the kid, your kid has a reasonable chance of being admitted. |
166 here |
When you say automatic admission, do you mean to the pool or to AAP? |
There are scores in the 160s but I don’t think any 170s. |
| New to FCPS. Just curious what the advantages of getting young kids into AAP are? When they get to middle school, everyone has a chance at AP classes right? |
To the pool. There is no such thing as automatic AAP admission as it is a holistic process. |
AP classes don’t start till high school. The biggest advantage of AAP is a better peer group. |
There is no pool anymore. |
There still is a pool, or something equivalent set aside for kids with good scores to automatically get a chance without a referral. |
| Is 146 good score. NV 99, V95, Q99…what if teacher is not motivated to submit good packet. |